u-video draft->core bc way more than 3+ pub and consuming impls/sites #5

Open
tantek opened this Issue Feb 16, 2017 · 2 comments

Projects

None yet

2 participants

@tantek
Member
tantek commented Feb 16, 2017 edited

It appears from http://indieweb.org/video#IndieWeb_Examples that there are way more than 3+ publishing sites that support u-video

  • Need to verify proper markup on those examples!

For consuming, known implementations include:

    1. Bridgy Publish supports consuming h-entry with u-video (for POSSEing to Twitter, Facebook, Flickr, e.g. this post http://tantek.com/2016/055/t12/fast-walk-hike-beach-video used Bridgy to do that)
    1. Woodwind.xyz (pretty sure - need to verify it embeds video in a usable way)
  • Others?
    ** Need to determine what other kinds of u-video consuming code / libraries / applications there may be

This issue is for tracking the maturity of u-video to transition it to a core property.

Once all the "Need to" items above have been processed and resolved successfully, we should be able to move forward.

cc: @kylewm @Benwerd @snarfed

@snarfed
snarfed commented Mar 2, 2017

example markup that bridgy consumes, from https://brid.gy/about#video :

<video class="u-video" src="/cat_hunting.mp4">
  Kitty is on the hunt!
</video>
@snarfed
snarfed commented Mar 2, 2017 edited

...and huh, thanks for the nudge. evidently bridgy/granary (same single implementation) don't actually render silo video posts as <video class="u-video"> yet. they only include links and thumbnail/poster images. i'll file an issue!

examples for the POSSE copies of tantek's original post above:

@snarfed snarfed referenced this issue in snarfed/granary Mar 3, 2017
Open

render <video>s #103

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment