Twitter | 搜尋 | |
Katharine Hayhoe
Not suspicious, just Canadian. Climate scientist, director, poli sci prof, knitter, pastor's wife, mom. TIME100 + Fortune50. First in line for cloning.
24,080
推文
7,927
正在跟隨
66,818
跟隨者
推文
Katharine Hayhoe 23 分鐘
回覆給 @michaeljkelly
Thanks Mike!
Reply Retweet 喜歡
Katharine Hayhoe 已轉推
Cheyenne CCL 3 小時
America's leading communicator, Dr. Katharine KHayhoe, gave NPR's listeners the lowdown on the National Climate Assessment this morning. She offered hope along with the dire warnings.
Reply Retweet 喜歡
Katharine Hayhoe 24 分鐘
回覆給 @BrentSullivan
Exactly what I was thinking of
Reply Retweet 喜歡
Katharine Hayhoe 3 小時
回覆給 @Dave_Renewable_
If it hadn’t, it would have been even bigger news. Great idea!
Reply Retweet 喜歡
Katharine Hayhoe 已轉推
Leela Daou 4 小時
“It’s not that we care about a 1-degree increase in global temperature in the abstract,” said. “We care about water, we care about food, we care about the economy—and every single one of those things is being affected by today.”
Reply Retweet 喜歡
Katharine Hayhoe 已轉推
Aaron Huertas 15 小時
回覆給 @KHayhoe
This is also going to stick with me because it's totally how scientists who do public service work operate. did the pies turn out okay?
Reply Retweet 喜歡
Katharine Hayhoe 15 小時
回覆給 @aaronhuertas
Yes they were 😋
Reply Retweet 喜歡
Katharine Hayhoe 15 小時
回覆給 @Icecinder
So you aren’t interested in facts or learning about things you don’t know. I’m sorry, but not surprised 😐
Reply Retweet 喜歡
Katharine Hayhoe 15 小時
回覆給 @DutroBen
Ben, it sounds like you don’t understand the diff between physics vs life sciences. Start here if you are interested in updating your understanding: then actually *read* the reports starting here: *then* ask q’s if u still want.
Reply Retweet 喜歡
Katharine Hayhoe 已轉推
Katharine Hayhoe 19 小時
I wrote the climate scenarios chapter myself so I can confirm it considers ALL scenarios, from those where we go carbon negative before end of century to those where carbon emissions continue to rise. What WH says is demonstrably false.
Reply Retweet 喜歡
Katharine Hayhoe 15 小時
Steve, you’re saying things that aren’t true, likely because you believe your political ideology is incompatible with positive solutions. Please update your understanding here if you’re interested in facts, and check out for sol’ns.
Reply Retweet 喜歡
Katharine Hayhoe 已轉推
Kate Marvel 20 小時
Let’s make it louder, shall we?
Reply Retweet 喜歡
Katharine Hayhoe 16 小時
The reason you've heard about natural cycles is because we climate scientists study them. Pls update your understanding here first: then read Ch 1-3 here:
Reply Retweet 喜歡
Katharine Hayhoe 16 小時
回覆給 @lalitlb @DoctorVive
subsequent studies have actually moved that back even further ...
Reply Retweet 喜歡
Katharine Hayhoe 17 小時
回覆給 @JaneLubchenco
Absolutely 😁🇨🇦
Reply Retweet 喜歡
Katharine Hayhoe 已轉推
Susan Hatch 18 小時
“It’s not that we care about a 1-degree increase in global temperature in the abstract,” she said. “We care about water, we care about food, we care about the economy—and every single one of those things is being affected by climate change today.” Katharine Hayhoe
Reply Retweet 喜歡
Katharine Hayhoe 17 小時
回覆給 @MarineDone
No, methane is 0.51 and carbon dioxide is 2.0
Reply Retweet 喜歡
Katharine Hayhoe 17 小時
回覆給 @POd_Cdn
Reply Retweet 喜歡
Katharine Hayhoe 17 小時
回覆給 @ThomasKBullock2
No, you didn’t. Try again.
Reply Retweet 喜歡
Katharine Hayhoe 已轉推
Sean Sublette 11月15日
SAVE THE DATE - Monday after Thanksgiving. 2:30pm ET. Very special webinar with . Reviewing the latest climate science leading up to the next National Climate Assessment. Register and attend free at:
Reply Retweet 喜歡