Frank Harrell

@f2harrell

Prof, Founding Chair of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt U. Expert Statistical Advisor, Office of Biostatistics, FDA CDER. Blog: Statistical Thinking -fharrell.com

Придружио/ла се јануар 2017.

Твитови

Блокирао/ла си корисника @f2harrell

Да ли сигурно желиш да видиш ове твитове? Приказивање твитова неће одблокирати корисника @f2harrell

  1. је ретвитовао/ла
    пре 19 сати

    1. Shut down 2. Jail key decision makers and possibly some of the engineers involved 3. Give the money back to the people it abused (its users) 4. Build ethical replacements for its useful bits

    Прикажи овај низ
    Опозови
  2. пре 16 сати

    Glad that has restarted this hot discussion on datamethods. I just posted a response that tries to generalize the question.

    Опозови
  3. је ретвитовао/ла
    19. дец

    Statistically, machine learning has poor modeling practices which should limit generalizability. It doesn't. Why? For tasks like image recognition, all humans on the ML team understand ground truth; in healthcare/science tasks, it won't be the same. We can expect lots of failure.

    Опозови
  4. је ретвитовао/ла
    пре 23 сата

    My Christmas present for the community: 2.7 is now on CRAN extending support for Gaussian processes and fixing a substantial performance bug in some post-processing methods among other new features and improvements.

    Опозови
  5. је ретвитовао/ла
    17. дец

    Please read—well worth your time. Challenges of Non–Intention-to-Treat Analyses | Research, Methods, Statistics | JAMA | JAMA Network

    Опозови
  6. је ретвитовао/ла
    17. дец

    It's a big stretch to put such a positive spin on the wastage of resources that occurs when the scientific pathway is led astray building upon results that can't be replicated.

    Опозови
  7. 17. дец

    Glad to see questionable research practices elevated with respect to severity of harm to science

    Опозови
  8. је ретвитовао/ла
    17. дец

    A+ beautiful, a grand achievement by it is wonderful to see Byrne on clean background, all the original copies I saw over the years all had extensive foxing. In my Envisioning Information, we fully rebuilt 2 Byrne pages, hand-separated colors for printing.

    Опозови
  9. је ретвитовао/ла
    16. дец

    Let me get this straight: Sears has $25 million laying around to pay out executives who ran the company into the ground, but doesn't have any money to give the thousands of workers they laid off severance pay?

    Опозови
  10. је ретвитовао/ла
    15. дец

    Tonight’s ruling creates confusion, puts affordable health insurance at risk, and targets Americans with pre-existing conditions. The Supreme Court already upheld the law’s constitutionality — twice. Sign up tonight for 2019 coverage at .

    Опозови
  11. је ретвитовао/ла
    14. дец

    "It took more than a half century to reach the point where faced with a choice between democracy and power, the party chose the latter," argues George Packer.

    Опозови
  12. је ретвитовао/ла
    14. дец

    Didn’t he impeach Bill Clinton over the same thing?

    Прикажи овај низ
    Опозови
  13. је ретвитовао/ла
    14. дец

    A couple days ago another team asked me to speak about Bayesian data analysis. I decided that instead of doing a nuts/bolts of how to fit/use Bayesian models, I would describe "Bayesian analysis: The Good Parts". <potentially controversial thread>

    Прикажи овај низ
    Опозови
  14. је ретвитовао/ла
    13. дец

    Not that this is terribly surprising, but still an important message for all to hear.

    Опозови
  15. је ретвитовао/ла
    12. дец

    Invite others to submit their lists of prevalent faux-pas' compromising reliable evidence generation.

    Опозови
  16. је ретвитовао/ла
    12. дец

    Hi everyone. It’s been awhile since I’ve had a good old-fashioned methods critique, but I'm feeling it today:

    Прикажи овај низ
    Опозови
  17. 12. дец

    Many Analysts, One Data Set – many conclusions - good discussion continues. Hope that joins in -

    Опозови
  18. 11. дец

    Favorite way to picture probabilities: not with stick figures or frequencies but with a thermometer plot (example below is taken from )

    Опозови
  19. 11. дец

    Statistician take of the day: A $100 data analysis can make a $1,000,000 study worth $1,000.

    Опозови
  20. 11. дец

    What the GOP stands for ...

    Опозови

Учитавање ће потрајати.

Твитер је можда премашио капацитет или је тренутно наишао на проблем. Покушај поново или посети статус Твитера за више информација.

    Можда ће ти се свидети

    ·