By MARTIN SHERMAN

The impending destruction of the Jewish community of Amona reflect failure of political will and ideo-intellectual bankruptcy of the elected government rather, than the inevitable culmination of a legal battle.

To lose our country by a scrupulous adherence to the written law, would be to lose the law itself, with life, liberty, property and all those who are enjoying them with us; thus absurdly sacrificing the ends to the means. – Thomas Jefferson, September 20, 1810

In Israel, the negative impact of the judicialization of politics on the Supreme Court’s legitimacy is already beginning to show its mark. Over the past decade, the public image of the Supreme Court as an autonomous and impartial arbiter has been increasingly eroded as political representatives of minority groups have come to realize that political arrangements and public policies agreed upon in majoritarian decision-making arenas are likely to be reviewed by an often hostile Supreme Court. As a result, the court and its judges are increasingly viewed by a considerable portion of the Israeli public as pushing forward their own political agenda… – Prof. Ran Hirschl,Towards Juristocracy: The Origins and Consequences of the New Constitutionalism, Harvard University Press, 2004.
read

Read more...

What is the purpose. He should be talking in private with Trump. Why is he not angling for a better deal from Trump?

(Communicated by the Prime Minister’s Media Adviser)

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, today (Thursday, 22 December 2016), released the following statement:

“Israelis deeply appreciate one of the great pillars of the US-Israel alliance: The willingness over many years of the US to stand up in the UN and veto anti-Israel resolutions.

I hope the US won’t abandon this policy; I hope it will abide by the principles set by President Obama himself in his speech in the UN in 2011: That peace will come not through UN resolutions, but only through direct negotiations between the parties.

And that’s why this proposed resolution is bad. It’s bad for Israel; it’s bad for the United States; and it’s bad for peace.”

Read more...

BESA Center Perspectives Paper No. 388

By Col. (res.) Dr. Eran Lerman, December 22, 2016

Practically every ideological and strategic group in the Middle East has a stake in the raw and murderous Syrian struggle. Viewed through the prism of the regional “game of camps,” the fall of Aleppo represents a major boost for Iran and her allies, given the active (and costly) role played there by Hezbollah fighters and the Iranian Revolutionary Guards Corps (specifically, Qasim Suleymani). Coupled with the growing role of the IRGC-backed forces in Iraq (“al-Hashd al-Sha’bi”) and the ongoing conflict in Yemen, the victory in Aleppo is feeding Tehran’s increasingly arrogant vision about the future of the region and Israel’s assured demise.
read

Read more...

Shoshana Bryen, JEWISH POLICY CENTER • December 22, 2016

President-elect Trump’s choice of David Friedman as Ambassador to Israel appears to be an excellent decision. It has already brought howls of protest from people invested heavily in the Oslo and subsequent accords, the “peace process” and the concept of the United States as an “evenhanded” broker between Israelis and Palestinians. Friedman, an Oslo-skeptic, has saidhe believes that, “Notwithstanding ‘agreements’ reached at Camp David, Oslo, Wye Plantation and elsewhere, neither Yasser Arafat nor Mahmoud Abbas ever had any intentions to observe the minimal conditions required of a two-state solution.”
read

Read more...

Ted Belman

The UN Security Council is due to vote today on an Egyptian draft resolution that would demand that Israel “immediately and completely cease all settlement activities”.

As I have often stated, the Arab States, though they need Israel’s help have never altered there demand Israel’s agreement to the Arab Peace Initiative.

This Egyptian sponsored resolution is another example of how intransigent they are even though they need us desperately.

Read more...

By Raphael Aren, TOI

[After discussing the various resolution which are coming up in the UNSC]

Even if an anti-settlement resolution passed, what difference would it make?

In the internal Israeli debate over what could happen at the Security Council in Obama’s last days, very little attention has been given to the question of how much impact an approved resolution would actually have. The answer is quite simple: Not much.

“It won’t change anything immediately,” said Aeyal Gross, a professor of international law at Tel Aviv University, even though — as opposed to decisions taken by the General Assembly — countries are obligated to act according to Security Council resolutions. It is possible that a first resolution might pave the way for another one, which at some point could lead to additional resolutions under Chapter VII of the UN Charter, which deals with “threat[s] to the peace, breach of the peace, or act[s] of aggression.”
read

Read more...

By Dr Mitchell Bard, TOI

The first semester of 2016-17 has been another phenomenal one for Jewish students across the country. While fear mongers have been scaring parents with exaggerated claims about how dangerous it is for Jewish students on campus, the truth is campuses across the country are beehives of pro-Israel activity that has gone unnoticed because it does not fit the narrative of Jews cowering in fear in their dorm rooms. In fact, more students are engaged in pro-Israel activity today than ever before.

While once a handful of pro-Israel groups such as Hillel, AIPAC and various uncoordinated Israel action committees operated on campus, today a multiplicity of organizations engage students from different perspectives. These organizations include (forgive me for any I’ve inadvertently left out): Hillel, AIPAC, AICE, StandWithUs, the David Project, AEPi, Hasbara Fellowships, ZOA, JNF, ADL, the Israel on Campus Coalition, Students Supporting Israel, Chabad, the Israeli American Council, The Maccabee Task Force, and Christians United for Israel.
read

Read more...

T. Belman. The NYT makes a big deal of Tillerson changing his tune. I see not problem at all. Its a matter of a risk/reward calculation. He decided to accept the risk in order to sign a $500 billion contract.

By NEIL MacFARQUHAR and ANDREW E. KRAMER, NYT, DEC. 20, 2016

MOSCOW — As a member of the U.S.-Russia Business Council and chief executive of Exxon Mobil, Rex W. Tillerson frequently voiced doubts about Russia’s investment climate, saying as late as 2008 that Russia “must improve the functioning of its judicial system and its judiciary. There is no respect for the rule of law in Russia today.”

This past February, however, Mr. Tillerson, President-elect Donald J. Trump’s choice to be the next secretary of state, was sounding a very different theme, telling students at the University of Texas that he has “a very close relationship” with President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia.
read

Read more...

By Selwyn Duke, AMERICAN THINKER

“Islam is not the problem,” proclaims the Left. And if you say otherwise, you’re a “racist,” even though “Muslim” is not a race. Yet a fact remains: virtually all the world’s terrorists today claim Islamic motivations. So if Islam (belief) is not the problem, are we then left with a genetic explanation for this violence? Is there something inherent in the groups generally embracing Islam — Arabs, Persians, Indonesians, Punjabis, etc. — that would account for it? And, hey, I’m just asking; it’s the liberals who profess ideas suggesting this possibility.

Consider: When analyzing WWII and Germany, few claim the problem was Germans, but Nazism. When looking at 1917 Russia, we don’t say the problem was Russians, but Marxism. So fill in the blank: when evaluating the Muslim world and its violence, do we assume the problem is the people or _____?
read

Read more...

by Geert Wilders, GATESTONE INSTITUTE

Read more...

T. Belman. Neither renegotiation or sanctions will result in a better deal. The US should not talk. It should do. It must prevent the hegemonic ambitions of the Iranian regime. The best way to do this is cut a deal with Russia if possible or arrange for a massive Sunni Army to gain control of the remaining areas of Syria and Iraq. Perhaps the Gulf States care enough to prevent the expansion of Iran to finance the deployment of a 100,000 strong Egyptian Army to Syria.

Why the new Commander-in-Chief has few good options for rebuilding the Middle East order that Obama negotiated away

By Lee Smith, TABLET

Forget China and underwater drones, forget Russian hacks and leaks, because it’s all a sideshow: America’s big-ticket foreign-policy issue is still the Iran deal. Donald Trump has promised to rip it up on day one of his presidency, but that’s not going to happen because it means the freshly minted commander-in-chief may have America poised for conflict with the leading state sponsor of terror before the band even starts to warm up for the inaugural ball next month at the newly opened Trump International Hotel.
read

Read more...

Why hasn’t the administration done anything about Syria, and won’t? Because the Iran Deal.

By Tony Badran, TABLET First published Sept 24/16

America’s settled policy of standing by while half a million Syrians have been killed, millions have become refugees, and large swaths of their country have been reduced to rubble is not a simple “mistake,” as critics like Nicholas D. Kristof and Roger Cohen have lately claimed. Nor is it the product of any deeper-seated American impotence or of Vladimir Putin’s more recent aggressions. Rather, it is a byproduct of America’s overriding desire to clinch a nuclear deal with Iran, which was meant to allow America to permanently remove itself from a war footing with that country and to shed its old allies and entanglements in the Middle East, which might also draw us into war. By allowing Iran and its allies to kill Syrians with impunity, America could demonstrate the corresponding firmness of its resolve to let Iran protect what President Barack Obama called its “equities” in Syria, which are every bit as important to Iran as pallets of cash.
read

Read more...

By Prof. Eyal Zisser, ISRAEL HAYOM

The assassination of the Russian ambassador in Ankara, horrifying as it was, has sparked concerns over the possible consequences for regional stability.

Some experts warned of an escalation in hostilities and deterioration of Russian-Turkish relations, even to the point of war between the two, citing the example of the assassination of Austro-Hungarian Royal Prince Ferdinand in June 1914 in Sarajevo, which led to World War I.

The sense of upheaval over the Russian ambassador’s murder, however, appears to have mostly stemmed from the fact that it was broadcast live, as if it were a reality TV show.
read

Read more...

By Barbara Diamond, TOI

Most of what I have written over the past year regarding the recent US Presidential election has come to fruition. That having been said, I am not a political oracle, but simply a fascinated observer of the process. Reading between the lines of political behavior and actions is often more interesting and valid than taking it all at face value.

For some time, I have been making a prediction privately which I have been loath to put into print as it is just a bit provocative. Who would want that!?
read

Read more...

Founder of Belgian People’s Party tells Arutz Sheva wave of populism sweeping across West is a boon for Israel.

By Yoni Kempinski, INN

While the left has decried the rising tide of populism across the United States and Europe, claiming it is tied to racism, xenophobia, and anti-Semitism, the leader of one of the new wave of populist parties says the political revolutions reshaping the West are not connected to racism – and are a boon for Israel.

Speaking to Arutz Sheva at the 2nd Jerusalem Leaders Summit, Mischaël Modrikamen, founder of the Belgian People’s Party, discussed the nature of the populist wave and its implications for the Jewish state.

“[There is] a clear distinction between the right-wing, neo-Nazi, fascist movements – and they are – if you look at the [Greek party] Golden Dawn, or the [Hungarian] Jobbik [party]… they are fascist, racist, and anti-Semitic,” said Modrikamen.
read

Read more...

By Harold Rhode, JCPA

The Syrian government, Russia, and Iran (SRI) are trying the change the demographic makeup of Syria. They aim to depopulate Syria of the Arab Sunnis, which, before the Arab Spring was the largest religio-ethnic group in Syria. They mostly inhabited a very fertile strip of land between Aleppo in the north, down to Damascus, and then southward to the Jordanian border. Those Arab Sunnis who did not leave are being forced to move to Idlib and Raqqa, near the Turkish border.1

Examining SRI’s military campaign and its policy towards the refugees they have created suggests this SRI strategy. The groups and places which the Russians have been attacking are the traditional strongholds of the Sunni Arab population – as of late Aleppo – the largest city in Syria.
read

Read more...

By: Barbara Opall-Rome, DEFENSE NEWS

Two Israeli F-35 “Adirs” fly in formation and display the US and Israeli flags after receiving fuel from a Tennessee Air National Guard KC-135, Dec, 6, 2016.Photo Credit: 1st Lt. Erik D. Anthony/US Air Force

TEL AVIV – About 30 Lockheed Martin specialists and three US Air Force representatives will remain in Israel indefinitely to help the Israel Air Force (IAF) operate and maintain its newest acquisition, the F-35I Adir.

The Lockheed Martin team, two USAF F-35 pilots and one USAF aircrew instructor are co-located at the IAF’s Nevatim base in the Negev desert, home of the 140th Golden Eagles Squadron, which received its first pair of Adir (Awesome/Mighty) Dec. 12.
read

Read more...

by Moshe Dann, JPOST

There are times in a nation’s history when it seems swept inexorably towards the next stage in its development and its destiny, often amidst inner conflicts and sometimes violently. The American Civil War is an example of a society divided over the issue of slavery which led to a devastating conflict.  The issue was complicated because the Supreme Court, under Chief Justice Roger Taney, had declared in the Dred Scott decision that slave-holding was a Constitutional right. Six years later, in 1863, President Abraham Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation which changed the course of American history. This was followed by Amendments to the Constitution which abolished slavery and guaranteed rights of all citizens.
read

Read more...

By Vic Rosenthal

ERETZ-ISRAEL was the birthplace of the Jewish people. Here their spiritual, religious and political identity was shaped. Here they first attained to statehood, created cultural values of national and universal significance and gave to the world the eternal Book of Books.

After being forcibly exiled from their land, the people kept faith with it throughout their Dispersion and never ceased to pray and hope for their return to it and for the restoration in it of their political freedom. – Beginning of  Israel’s Declaration of Independence, May 14, 1948

Today there is a deepening ideological divide on one important issue among Israeli Jews. It’s not especially useful to simply refer to it as “left vs. right,” although one’s opinion on this issue usually predicts where one falls on the political spectrum. It is a divergence of opinion about what kind of country we want to have. It’s the disagreement about defining a “Jewish state.”
read

Read more...

Pew Center Survey shows rapid climb in the percentage of US Orthodox Jews – and their influence goes beyond their numbers.

http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/221990

Read more...