Jessica Lovering

@J_Lovering

Director of Energy , researching and writing about all things nuclear. Proud &

Oakland, CA
ಮಾರ್ಚ್ 2012 ಸಮಯದಲ್ಲಿ ಸೇರಿದ್ದಾರೆ
30 ಆಗಸ್ಟ್ ರಂದು ಜನನ

@J_Lovering ತಡೆಹಿಡಿಯಲಾಗಿದೆ

ನೀವು ಖಚಿತವಾಗಿಯೂ ಈ ಟ್ವೀಟ್‌ಗಳನ್ನು ನೋಡಲು ಬಯಸುವಿರಾ? ಟ್ವೀಟ್‌ಗಳನ್ನು ನೋಡುವುದು @J_Lovering ಅವರನ್ನು ತಡೆತೆರವುಗೊಳಿಸುವುದಿಲ್ಲ.

  1. Against the myth, the happiness level of Bhutan is not very high. Certainly not the 'happiest country in the world’.

  2. ಗೆ ಪ್ರತ್ಯುತ್ತರವಾಗಿ

    . Not sure. Nuclear and hydro have higher EROI, that's a good marker of productivity:

  3. ಗೆ ಪ್ರತ್ಯುತ್ತರವಾಗಿ

    . Whereas France has the lowest bills in Western Europe (and very low emissions), a much better model

  4. "Tankesmedjans kärnkraftsexpert Jessica Lovering har skrivit mycket om kärnkraften& bland annat i en global analys av kärnkraftens kostnader

  5. Universal electrification has never happened without an attendant agrarian transition

  6. Household electrification tends to be a side benefit of growth and industrialization

  7. Trump's energy policy is basically Romney's energy policy with more exclamation points.

  8. Obviously bigger fish to fry right now, but maybe after this election we have a quick convo on grammar education.

  9. ಗೆ ಪ್ರತ್ಯುತ್ತರವಾಗಿ

    . I don't think we should constrain energy, I think the world needs to use a lot more (hopefully clean) energy

  10. . And different emissions impact. Nuke+hydro replaced coal and oil, now wind+solar tend to replace gas

  11. ಗೆ ಪ್ರತ್ಯುತ್ತರವಾಗಿ

    . The problem that we were originally highlighting is that RPS driving wind+solar, but nuclear+hydro down++

  12. ಗೆ ಪ್ರತ್ಯುತ್ತರವಾಗಿ

    . RPSs +good at driving deployment of wind and solar (hydro usually excluded in RPS), also tax credits big driver in US

  13. ಗೆ ಪ್ರತ್ಯುತ್ತರವಾಗಿ

    . No, we're saying that RPS->deployment of wind and solar, but those haven't been driving down emissions noticeably

  14. Your point about unseen nuke plant was spot on. We hide. Out of sight, out of mind=no anti-nuke scrutiny. Let's be out & proud!

  15. ಗೆ ಪ್ರತ್ಯುತ್ತರವಾಗಿ

    . Nuclear costs are declining in the places actually building them, see our study

  16. ಗೆ ಪ್ರತ್ಯುತ್ತರವಾಗಿ

    . I would only support a carbon tax, if the money was re-invested in energy R&D, making tech cheaper

  17. ಗೆ ಪ್ರತ್ಯುತ್ತರವಾಗಿ

    . I disagree, I think leveling the playing field will increase competition and drive costs down for all

  18. ಗೆ ಪ್ರತ್ಯುತ್ತರವಾಗಿ

    . Does Sweden have an RPS? What is it? And does it include the existing hydro?

  19. ಗೆ ಪ್ರತ್ಯುತ್ತರವಾಗಿ

    . Point was the rate of decarbonization. France and Sweden were fastest (when they built out nuclear)

  20. First criticality for Watts Bar 2 Very exciting for clean air enthusiasts like myself

  21. My 2-part climate strategy for the next few decades: 1. Make everything electric. 2. Clean up electricity.

  22. Too cute not to share: A hopefully not abandoned baby owl in an oklo team member's yard! We do this for you, buddy.

  23. Why cheap green energy could derail the renewable revolution

  24. ಗೆ ಪ್ರತ್ಯುತ್ತರವಾಗಿ

    . Thanks, Sam! It's a simple (not easy) policy change that could have a big impact

  25. Reservoirs in the west. Northern CA doing better. SoCal not so much. Lake Mead in bad shape:

  26. Agreed. Best speaker I've ever heard at RIC. She needs two new colleagues with similar expertise

  27. Maybe the lack of extensive coal deposits explains why Westeros still hasn't had an industrial revolution after 8,000 years.

  28. It won't even cause a local disturbance though, because they have natural gas backup (on-site I believe)

  29. ಗೆ ಪ್ರತ್ಯುತ್ತರವಾಗಿ

    . In 2015, Ivanpah produced 650GWh, or 0.22% of California's in-state generation.

  30. ಗೆ ಪ್ರತ್ಯುತ್ತರವಾಗಿ

    . Could someone on twitter quickly calculate Ivanpah's share of CA elec. generation?

  31. ಗೆ ಪ್ರತ್ಯುತ್ತರವಾಗಿ

    . I know, the article says the effect on the grid is unknown at this time, and I said "zip" out loud.

  32. ಗೆ ಪ್ರತ್ಯುತ್ತರವಾಗಿ

    . That's a shame because it has lower land intensity than PV, less rare earths, and better storage

  33. Does anyone know a reference for the actual area covered by evacuation orders around Fukushima over time?

  34. Secretary of Energy, lawmakers argue to save the existing nuclear power plants in the U.S.

  35. ಗೆ ಪ್ರತ್ಯುತ್ತರವಾಗಿ

    . Ooooh, I'm intrigued

  36. : At yesterday’s Summit, everyone from to discussed how to :

  37. Core truth. No one can appreciate the beauty of our home if we don't invite them over

ಲೋಡಿಂಗ್ ಸಮಯ ಸ್ವಲ್ಪ ತೆಗೆದುಕೊಳ್ಳುತ್ತಿರುವಂತೆನಿಸುತ್ತದೆ.

Twitter ಸಾಮರ್ಥ್ಯ ಅಧಿಕವಾಗಿರಬಹುದು ಅಥವಾ ಈ ಕ್ಷಣದ ತೊಂದರೆಯನ್ನು ಅನುಭವಿಸುತ್ತಿರಬಹುದು. ಮತ್ತೆ ಪ್ರಯತ್ನಿಸಿ ಅಥವಾ ಇನ್ನಷ್ಟು ಮಾಹಿತಿಗೆ Twitter ಸ್ಥಿತಿ ಗೆ ಭೇಟಿ ನೀಡಿ.

    ಇದನ್ನೂ ಸಹ ನೀವು ಇಷ್ಟಪಡಬಹುದು

    ·