A lot of edits I do are when I'm in the review queues. If I see something that obviously doesn't add anything to the validity of the question I remove it. Most of the times that ends up being Hi, thanks, help I'm a beginner, etc. I was following what I read here.

The problem is a large amount of these are getting rejected, to the point where I've been temporarily banned from queues and editing. If I'm going to get banned for doing what I thought was improving the site, should I just stop making these edits?

share
7  
What are they being rejected for? Your most recent was simply a conflict, not necessarily a bad edit. One before that was a pointless edit given the rest of the question, but got 2 approvals anyway. Have you been through the list and read the reasons? – jonrsharpe 2 days ago
12  
Is the answer to this question not obvious? Are you expecting people to tell you, "no, you should keep doing the thing that is getting you banned."? Clearly what you're doing now is not appropriate. Whether you want to just not suggest edits or learn how to suggest appropriate edits that won't be rejected is of course up to you. – Servy 2 days ago
2  
Most of the rejected edits seem to be removing noise like "thanks". Maybe the edits were considered to be "too minor". You also got unlucky, as a couple were rejected because of conflicting subsequent edits. – Cerbrus 2 days ago
10  
@Cerbrus Edits rejected due to conflicts don't contribute towards the edit ban. – Servy 2 days ago
    
@Servy: I wasn't aware of that. TIL, thanks. – Cerbrus 2 days ago
26  
Jeremy, I'd suggest: don't stop editing, but try to improve everything there is to improve about a question / answer. If a post has more flaws than just the "thanks" noise, edit that as well. – Cerbrus 2 days ago
    
@Cerbrus That's a good point and I'll do that moving forward. Should I stop editing just the small thanks, hi, beginner type posts then, if that's all I would be changing? – Jeremy W 2 days ago
5  
@Servy I appreciate the condescension but obviously the answer wasn't obvious to me as I needed to ask the community of their thoughts on the matter. – Jeremy W 2 days ago
22  
Also, do not edit crap. Even if your edit cleans up all cleanable issues with a question, that doesn't matter if the end result is a really well written but horribly off topic question, or a "do my homework" request. If the question should be closed or downvoted, I'd refrain from editing it. Not only does it waste your time but that of three reviewers as well. – l4mpi 2 days ago
    
@JeremyW It wasn't obvious to you that you being banned for suggesting edits inappropriately was an indication that your edits weren't appropriate? If you honestly think that people are banned for no reason, and that we want them to continue making edits that we banned them for making, then yes, you should stop editing. If you being banned is not an obvious indication that something is wrong then you shouldn't be editing posts. – Servy 2 days ago
    
@l4mpi That's a good point. I'd never thought about it like that. I'll do that moving forward as well, thanks! – Jeremy W 2 days ago
3  
@Servy No it wasn't obvious to me because I was following instructions from the meta stack exchange link I provided that assured me I was doing the right thing. – Jeremy W 2 days ago
4  
3  
In defense of this question, we should keep in mind that robo reviewers are a thing and just seeing an edit remove stuff (regardless of what it actually is) triggers many of the reviewers to reject the edit… – poke yesterday
1  
@poke As there are no known-good suggested edit review audits, robo-reviewers in the suggested edits queue simply reject every edit they see without reading the edit at all. On the other side you have well-meaning but inexperienced users who regularly approve crap edits. Then you have the users who actually review (for better or worse) the edits and make (mostly) informed decisions. These users sometimes make mistakes, but for the most part (and in this case) they are correct. However, when combined with the other two groups, anything can happen. – Tiny Giant 14 hours ago
up vote 73 down vote accepted

As one of the lowest-reputation users to earn Archaeologist, Research Assistant, and just now Copy Editor, I feel compelled to write this.

You cannot give up after one ban. Get up, look at why you were banned, and try to fix the problem. Looking over your history, it seems crystal clear that your edits aren't thorough enough.

I've found that removing fluff from posts isn't really a good edit on its own—leave that to 2K users. Instead, add in the removal of fluff with other edits, such as:

  • Fix terrible spelling and/or grammar
  • See that gigantic stack trace or code dump in the question? Put it into a code block.
  • If you find a link to an image URL with the text "enter image description here", you can turn the link into an actual image.
  • Code spans by themselves on their own line, especially multi-line code spans, usually look much better as a code block.
  • Words and phrases in camelCase or snake_case are often variable names, class names, or function names, and can be put in code spans.
  • CSS looks much better if you add <!-- language: lang-css -->, especially if it contains color hexes or ID selectors because those contain # characters which are rendered as comments by default.

This list could possibly also be linked to for users posting comments as answers—if you keep these in mind, it's easy to gain 50 reputation in a day, as I have done on several occasions.

share
6  
I appreciate this answer. Going forward I'll definitely leave the removing of fluff to the users with 2k+ rep and be more thorough with my edits going forward. – Jeremy W 2 days ago
1  
been meaning to ask somewhere, how does one turn a link to an image into an embedded image in the post? – DForck42 2 days ago
3  
@DForck42 you add an exclamation point before the brackets around the link text. – Stephen Leppik 2 days ago
6  
To quote (movie reference) Billy Madison's statement: "If your dog goes missing [a bad post is made], after one day's search [a single ban] do you just give up? No! You get out there and you find that f@$%^*$ dog!" ;-) – Ghersic 2 days ago
1  
Another useful, but relatively minor, edit is fixing tags, if necessary. Especially if the question doesn't have a language tag. – Justin Time 2 days ago
2  
A bit of a nitpick, but "variable names, class names, or function names" could be more simply: "indentifiers" – Tiny Giant 2 days ago

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .