Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

The Taylor series represents a non-polynomial function as an infinite series of polynomials, so is it possible to express a polynomial function as an infinite series of non-polynomial functions?

share|cite|improve this question
    
Random relevant comment: Taylor series are nice because you can write an arbitrary smooth function (which can be complicated) as a sum of polynomials (which are relatively simple). – mathematician 3 hours ago
    
Depends on you understanding of represents. Pointwise it is fairly obvious – Sebastian Bechtel 2 hours ago

Without constraints on the functions, the answer is trivial. Take any family of non-polynomial functions $\phi_n(x),n>0$ such that their sum converges to some non-polynomial $\sigma(x)$.

Then define

$$\phi_0(x):=P(x)-\sigma(x)$$ and you have it:

$$\sum_{n=0}^\infty\phi_n(x)=P(x).$$


The set of non-polynomial functions is much richer than that of polynomials, so there is no symmetry between Taylor and "reverse Taylor".


Another very simple example is the family of functions that equal the desired polynomial in range $[n,n+1)$ and zero elsewhere.

share|cite|improve this answer
2  
+1 for that last example. – Brevan Ellefsen 9 hours ago

Here is an interesting example from my own studies at age $14$ that gives you any polynomial you want: $$\frac{(-1)^n}{n!}\sum _{k=0}^n{n \choose k}\left(-1\right)^{n-k}f(x)\left(\sin \left(x\right)+k\right)^n =f(x)$$

share|cite|improve this answer
    
back in "grade school"? – KCd 5 hours ago
    
I have always understood the term "grade school" to be a synonym for elementary school. (Look it up.) Not too many 14 year olds there. – KCd 3 hours ago
    
But in order to evaulate the left hand side, you need to evaluate $f(x)$ which is not that such great deal of Express polynomial without polynomials because you stuck tuck it right back in there... – Laray 2 hours ago
    
@Laray That is actually how Mark's example works too. Strictly speaking, a polynomial multiplied by a non-polynomial is a non-polynomial, so this does satisfy the criteria – Brevan Ellefsen 2 hours ago
    
I was (as I read the Question) thinking about to evaluate the polynomial (and derivatives/Integrals/whatever you deem necessary) at a single point to get an approximation. Just like I do at a Taylor/Laurant-Series... – Laray 2 hours ago

$\frac{x^2}{(1-x)^k}$ is not a polynomial for any $k>0$.

Yet $$ \sum_{k=1}^\infty \frac{x^2}{(1-x)^k} = -x $$ is a polynomial.

If you want a series which converges on the entire real axis, try $$ \sum_{k=1}^\infty x^2 \left(e^{x^2}-1\right)e^{-kx^2} = x^2 $$

share|cite|improve this answer

Sure it's possible! Take a simple fourier series. One of my favorite:

$$x=\pi-2\left(\frac{\sin(x)}1+\frac{\sin(2x)}2+\frac{\sin(3x)}3+\dots\right)$$

For $x\in(0,2\pi)$.

$$y=-2\left(\frac{\sin(y)}1-\frac{\sin(2y)}2+\frac{\sin(3y)}3-\dots\right)$$

For $y\in(-\pi,\pi)$.

share|cite|improve this answer
1  
your Fourier series on the RHS is not a polynomial even though it is equal to $x$ on the interval $(0, 2\pi)$ – hyportnex 9 hours ago
    
@hyportnex Yes...? – Simply Beautiful Art 9 hours ago
1  
the question was how to represent a polynomial not a part of a polynomial – hyportnex 9 hours ago
    
Suppose you are looking at $x^2+2x-1$. This is then trivial, since$$x^2+2x-1=\left(\pi-2\left(\frac{\sin(x)}1+\frac{\sin(2x)}2+\frac{\sin(3x)}3+\dots\right)\right)^2+2\left(\pi-2\left(\frac{\sin(x)}1+\frac{\sin(2x)}2+\frac{\sin(3x)}3+\dots\right)\right)-1$$ – Simply Beautiful Art 9 hours ago
1  
but the RHS is periodic and the LHS is not over the whole axis, so the two sides can equal only on a restricted interval, the RHS is not equal to a polynomial over the whole axis for polynomials (except for the constant) are never periodic functions. – hyportnex 9 hours ago

Here's an easy example. The hard part is actually just making sure none of the infinite number of functions in the sum is a polynomial, assuming you consider the zero function to be a polynomial.

Let $p(x)$ be an arbitrary polynomial. Then let \begin{align} f_0(x) &= \sin x \\ f_1(x) &= \begin{cases} p(x) & x < 0 \\ -\sin x & x \geq 0 \end{cases} \\ f_2(x) &= \begin{cases} -\sin x & x < 0 \\ p(x) & x \geq 0 \end{cases} \\ f_n(x) &= \begin{cases} \dfrac{\sin x}{2^{n+1}} & \text{$n>2$ and $n$ odd} \\ \dfrac{\sin x}{2^n} & \text{$n>2$ and $n$ even} \end{cases} \\ \end{align}

None of these functions is a polynomial, since each function has an infinite number of zeros. But $p(x) = f_0(x) + f_1(x) + f_2(x).$

The functions $f_n(x)$ for $n > 2$ are defined in order to satisfy the requirement to express $p(x)$ as an infinite number of non-polynomial functions (which I think is the most difficult part of this problem). Each successive pair of functions has sum zero, so $f_3(x) + \cdots + f_{2k}(x) = 0$ for any integer $k$. For $n>2,$ therefore, the partial sum $f_0(x) + \cdots + f_n(x)$ is $p(x)$ if $n$ is even and is $p(x) + \frac{\sin x}{2^{n+1}}$ if $n$ is odd.

The functions $\frac{\sin x}{2^{n+1}}$ converge to zero as $n\to\infty,$ so the sum converges to $p(x).$

share|cite|improve this answer

Consider the sum of the sequence of characteristic functions of all intervals [n,n+1) for all integers n. None of these functions is a polynomial, yet their sum is one.

share|cite|improve this answer
1  
Already said, more generally. – Yves Daoust 55 mins ago

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.