Tweet

Anda memblokir @GunarOlsen

Yakin ingin melihat Tweet ini? Melihat Tweet tidak akan membuka blokir @GunarOlsen

  1. Tweet Sematan
    5 Jul

    My first piece for : I went to conference & spoke to several historians who protested SHAFR’s decision to invite David Petraeus to give the keynote address.

    Batalkan
  2. 13 jam yang lalu

    The extent to which liberal groups speak out against US war is limited to hand-wringing over how humanely the war is conducted—not to be mistaken for opposition to the war itself. Great reporting by in

    Batalkan
  3. 23 Des

    The Cold War was a "a redistribution of violence, so that the great powers saw proportionately less of it and the weaker states proportionately more." —Daniel Immerwahr in on Paul Thomas Chamerlin's book-length rebuttal of the "long peace"

    Batalkan
  4. 22 Des

    In my⁩ Q&A w ⁦⁩, he explained that the war in Yemen is about “maximizing the return from the scramble for the last bits of liquidity in the world” and “undermining the capacity of the people’s ability to resist.“ Read the rest⁩ here:

    Batalkan
  5. me-Retweet
    21 Des

    Hillary Clinton May be impressively plastic in many respects but her belief in the Forever War, which she has been so instrumental in starting and restarting, is 110% authentic

    Batalkan
  6. 21 Des
    Tampilkan utas ini
    Batalkan
  7. 21 Des

    The war in Yemen is not a civil or proxy war. It‘s “a century-long campaign to subordinate and integrate it into an increasingly intertwined system known as globalization or neoliberal global economy.” My Q&A with ⁦⁩ in ⁦⁩:

    Tampilkan utas ini
    Batalkan
  8. me-Retweet
    20 Des

    “The 45 years of peace between the Cold War’s superpowers were also 45 years of killing for much of the rest of the world.” Daniel Immerwahr in on a new history of the Cold War

    Batalkan
  9. me-Retweet
    20 Des

    "The 45 years of peace between the Cold War's superpowers that Gaddis praised were also 45 years of killing for much of the rest of the world." Daniel Immerwahr on Paul Chamberlin's bracing book, The Cold War's Killing Fields, in :

    Tampilkan utas ini
    Batalkan
  10. me-Retweet
    20 Des

    For most of humanity, the heyday of the "liberal international order" looks more like this map of mass conflicts in which the superpowers made their mark:

    Tampilkan utas ini
    Batalkan
  11. 20 Des

    Really enjoyed Salim Yaqub’s classic book on how the Eisenhower Doctrine was designed not only to protect the Middle East from Soviet encroachment, but also to contain Nasser’s radical Arab nationalism by strengthening the pro-Western tendencies of the conservative Arab states.

    Tampilkan utas ini
    Batalkan
  12. me-Retweet
    18 Des

    For , I wrote about white liberal guilt, class voyeurism, and the parallels between 's Y Tu Mamá También and ROMA

    Tampilkan utas ini
    Batalkan
  13. me-Retweet
    17 Des
    Batalkan
  14. me-Retweet
    16 Des

    20 yrs ago today on December 16, 1998 Pres. Bill Clinton launched Operation Desert Fox, an illegal, unjustified military attack on Iraq in which the US attacked 100 targets with cruise missiles. I there in the middle of the bombing to witness its effects. Here's my story 1/

    Tampilkan utas ini
    Batalkan
  15. me-Retweet
    15 Des

    The US sells nearly 60% of the world’s weapons. There is hardly a conflict on earth where US weapons makers aren’t profiting from the deaths of innocents. Any truly progressive foreign policy must take as a starting point a dramatic reduction of US military sales and assistance.

    Batalkan
  16. me-Retweet
    13 Des

    New from me in : Today's historic Yemen vote, with Khashoggi as its catalyst, offers an important lesson for the left's foreign policy: The outrage of a well-informed public can constrain our leaders' worst impulses

    Batalkan
  17. me-Retweet
    12 Des

    Must-buy! During the Cold War, the US attempted 69 different regime changes. Only 6 were overt (using military force), while 63 were covert (assassinating leaders, sponsoring coups, manipulating electoral results, or covertly aiding dissidents).

    Batalkan
  18. 12 Des
    Batalkan
  19. 12 Des

    The dominant narrative that Obama "failed to intervene" in Syria gets the story all wrong, drastically obscuring how responsible the CIA's arm-and-equip program was for ultimately escalating the conflict. gets it right in :

    Batalkan
  20. 11 Des

    I added a page on my website to keep track of the times I’ve asked powerful people difficult questions in public. Despite the page’s title, I don’t like self congratulation. But I do like making lists & keeping track of things, so this is what that’s about

    Batalkan
  21. me-Retweet
    11 Des

    Saudi Arabia is an over-indulged client state, not a strategic ally, and cutting off the arms supply to that ghastly despotism won’t make any appreciable difference in the daily life of 99% of Americans

    Batalkan

Pemuatan tampaknya berlangsung agak lama.

Twitter sedang kelebihan beban atau mengalami sedikit masalah. Coba lagi atau kunjungi Status Twitter untuk informasi lebih lanjut.

    Mungkin Anda juga suka

    ·