Twitter | Search | |
Tom Chivers
Science writer, BuzzFeed UK. Once thrown out of Faith No More backstage party for stealing cheese. Far too nice to be a journalist, according to Terry Pratchett
83,430
Tweets
885
Following
25,651
Followers
Tweets
Tom Chivers 12m
Reply Retweet Like
Tom Chivers 30m
fucking hell, i didn't know about that. That's a story in its own right
Reply Retweet Like
Tom Chivers 30m
isn't it amazing?
Reply Retweet Like
Tom Chivers 54m
Reply Retweet Like
Tom Chivers 1h
christ jesus.
Reply Retweet Like
Tom Chivers 2h
this is absolutely bonkers. (It's about Trump, obviously.)
Reply Retweet Like
Tom Chivers 17h
Reply Retweet Like
Tom Chivers retweeted
India Knight 17h
I’d like to hear from the vast numbers of nice liberal people who loudly - proudly - said that Clinton & Trump were “as bad as each other”.
Reply Retweet Like
Tom Chivers retweeted
Robin Edds 19h
Dropping the mic on funny British tweets with The 100 Funniest British Tweets OF ALL TIME. Enjoy.
Reply Retweet Like
Tom Chivers 21h
yes exactly (having this conversation about definition of life as we speak)
Reply Retweet Like
Tom Chivers 21h
you're welcome! I like this stuff but Twitter isn't made for it. FWIW I think any attempt at simple definition is doomed to failure
Reply Retweet Like
Tom Chivers 21h
…you've kicked the problem of definition one place down the road. Everything "maintains itself" to some degree. What degree = life?
Reply Retweet Like
Tom Chivers 21h
exactly. What does "maintain yourself" mean? No living thing can maintain itself 100%. And stars maintain themselves, with gravity…
Reply Retweet Like
Tom Chivers 21h
also, "create themselves" isn't right. Living things are created by their parents. Are IVF babies created by their parents?
Reply Retweet Like
Tom Chivers 21h
yes! Infectious bacteria. They don't "maintain themselves", they rely on the cell machinery of their hosts to survive.
Reply Retweet Like
Tom Chivers 21h
…things display a selection of. See Wittgenstein on games: for an example of what I mean
Reply Retweet Like
Tom Chivers 21h
so you will end up with a large group of attributes that describe life, no one of which is universal to life, but which all living…
Reply Retweet Like
Tom Chivers 21h
no. I think that for any simple definition of life you will be able to find absurd examples (either that do or don't fit).
Reply Retweet Like
Tom Chivers 21h
nice. thank you
Reply Retweet Like
Tom Chivers 21h
oh the heap thing? Yep. You end up in Wittgenstein and family resemblances if you follow this route for long, if I recall correctly
Reply Retweet Like