Twitter | Cerca | |
Matt Apuzzo
I write for The New York Times. And I'm on the Internet!
11.341
Tweet
935
Following
19.478
Follower
Tweet
Matt Apuzzo ha ritwittato
Adam Goldman 11 feb 2016
‘You don’t add a bit of value, do you?’: Texas judge berates government lawyers
Reply Retweet Mi piace
Matt Apuzzo 1 feb 2016
In case says shows "the cost of turning a blind eye to laws protecting wildlife" Lumber Liquidators is fined 4 days of sales
Reply Retweet Mi piace
Matt Apuzzo ha ritwittato
Simon Evans 18 gen 2016
Exclusive: FIFA's Blatter is still being paid his salary despite ban from world soccer
Reply Retweet Mi piace
Matt Apuzzo 18 gen 2016
In risposta a @KatzOnEarth @RosieGray
Reply Retweet Mi piace
Matt Apuzzo ha ritwittato
Eric Teetsel 18 gen 2016
"Two" Corinthians... It won't matter. Nothing seems to matter.
Reply Retweet Mi piace
Matt Apuzzo 18 gen 2016
"The Bible is the best." - Trump
Reply Retweet Mi piace
Matt Apuzzo 18 gen 2016
In risposta a @NickFoxNYT
And she's right. Valley didn't turn them down on lone wolf issue. Turned them down on encryption but that wasn't the question.
Reply Retweet Mi piace
Matt Apuzzo 18 gen 2016
In risposta a @NickFoxNYT
Mitchell responds, "they were flatly turned down. They got nowhere." HRC says that's not what she heard.
Reply Retweet Mi piace
Matt Apuzzo 18 gen 2016
In risposta a @NickFoxNYT
I just re-read transcript. Question was lone wolves. HRC she's pleased the White House went to Valley to start the conversation
Reply Retweet Mi piace
Matt Apuzzo 18 gen 2016
In risposta a @NickFoxNYT
I think there is a willingness by Silicon Valley to work with White House on this effort.
Reply Retweet Mi piace
Matt Apuzzo ha ritwittato
Anup Kaphle 18 gen 2016
"They said ISIS, ISIS and they started to hit me." — Bangladeshi man attacked in New York
Reply Retweet Mi piace
Matt Apuzzo 18 gen 2016
In risposta a @NickFoxNYT
I think the moderator was talking encryption, but HRC was talking about terrorism and this meeting:
Reply Retweet Mi piace
Matt Apuzzo 18 gen 2016
This is objectively not true, but since none of this will happen, it's moot.
Reply Retweet Mi piace
Matt Apuzzo 17 gen 2016
Visit to Silicon Valley last week wasn't focused on encryption so I bet HRC answer was misunderstood.
Reply Retweet Mi piace
Matt Apuzzo 17 gen 2016
In risposta a @SymeDontDie
no because the reading of police custody is broad enough that No. Charleston, Ferguson, Staten Island likely would be covered.
Reply Retweet Mi piace
Matt Apuzzo 17 gen 2016
divert from other divisions, sure, but do you want a tax or environmental lawyer doing these cases?
Reply Retweet Mi piace
Matt Apuzzo 17 gen 2016
simply not true that there are plenty of civil rights lawyers.
Reply Retweet Mi piace
Matt Apuzzo 17 gen 2016
In risposta a @SymeDontDie
And federal law has a higher standard (willfully violating civil rights) than your local assault, manslaughter, etc charge.
Reply Retweet Mi piace
Matt Apuzzo 17 gen 2016
In risposta a @SymeDontDie
Civil rights division doesn't have anywhere near the manpower to investigate every police-involved death.
Reply Retweet Mi piace
Matt Apuzzo 17 gen 2016
Not to mention it would require a massive and expensive expansion civil rights division. 2/2
Reply Retweet Mi piace