Twitter | शोधा | |
Gregg Jarrett
Formerly a trial attorney, Jarrett is a legal and political analyst for Fox New Channel.
५८९
ट्विट्स
९०
फॉलोइंग
१,३८,०९७
फॉलोअर्स
ट्विट्स
Gregg Jarrett १३ एप्रि
Clapper was just on CNN defending Comey. This from a proven liar. Clapper should be in prison for perjury. Obama protected him.
Reply Retweet पसंत केले
Gregg Jarrett १३ एप्रि
I’ve finished reading Comey’ book. It’s an easy and superficial read. I saw nothing that was true. I can only conclude that Comey’s version of events is fantasy. It is fiction. Things will end badly for Comey. He stole government documents.
Reply Retweet पसंत केले
Gregg Jarrett १३ एप्रि
I obtained a copy of Comey’s book. I’m half way through, but so far there is nothing resembling the truth. I’ll keep searching for something other than self-adoration and puffery. So far, there is no demonstrable truth. Which puts a lie to the title of the book.
Reply Retweet पसंत केले
Gregg Jarrett १० एप्रि
Very excited about the cover for my forthcoming book. HarperCollins did a great job! It's called, "The Russia Hoax: The Illicit Scheme To Clear Hillary Clinton and Frame Donald Trump." You can check it out on Amazon.
Reply Retweet पसंत केले
Gregg Jarrett १० एप्रि
I’ve written a book, soon to be published: “The Russia Hoax: The Illicit Scheme to Clear Hillary Clinton and Frame Donald Trump.” You can check out the details on Amazon. -Gregg
Reply Retweet पसंत केले
Gregg Jarrett ३ एप्रि
Unethical Mueller, in his court filing, admits that Rosenstein’s order appointing him was intentionally vague. This violates the special counsel law that requires a specific statement of facts to be investigated. Rosenstein and Muller colluded to break the law and should resign
Reply Retweet पसंत केले
Gregg Jarrett १९ मार्च
Comey’s lawyer said his client has been defamed by Trump. So why hasn’t he sued? The reason is obvious. Truth is a defense to defamation. If Comey didn’t commit crimes and lie then he would file a lawsuit. His failure to do so indicates he knows what he did broke several laws.
Reply Retweet पसंत केले
Gregg Jarrett १८ मार्च
If Comey cleared Cinton for political reasons (as evidence suggests) that’s obstruction of justice. If he gave false testimony to Congress, well...you know. I could go all day long on Comey. Looking forward to his work of fiction with the pretentious, self-righteous title.
Reply Retweet पसंत केले
Gregg Jarrett १८ मार्च
As for Comey, he appears to have stolen government documents, a crime under 18 USC 641. If any were classified (as Grassley seems to believe), it’s a crime under 18 USC 1924 (and probably 793). Deceiving the FISA court and concealing evidence? That’s 6 different felonies.
Reply Retweet पसंत केले
Gregg Jarrett १८ मार्च
If it is true that McCabe gave false and misleading statements to the IG, he should be charged criminally under 18 USC 1001. If he was under oath, as the AG statement alleges, he should be charged with perjury under 18 USC 1621. Losing his job is the least of McCabe’s concerns.
Reply Retweet पसंत केले
Gregg Jarrett १८ मार्च
What uninformed and idiotic statements by Asha Rangappa. The OIG and OPR found McCabe did not give honest answers. He was fired for that, as the regulations require. Period. But she knows better? It’s reflects poorly on the FBI that she was once an agent.
Reply Retweet पसंत केले
Gregg Jarrett ६ मार्च
Hope you’ll tune in to Hannity tonight at 9 pm, eastern for a discussion on the special counsel probe...and more. Gregg
Reply Retweet पसंत केले
Gregg Jarrett २५ फेब्रु
Grassley Graham memo; The “BULK” of the Fisa Application was the Clinton/DNC bought and paid for dossier. McCabe, “No dossier, no application” The media lying all day as usual. Full analysis Monday on Hannity. Hope you’ watch! Gregg
Reply Retweet पसंत केले
Gregg Jarrett २२ फेब्रु
If you are at or near CPAC, come by to watch Hannity “live” tonight (Thursday) at 9 pm. I’ll be joining Sean, along with a great group of guests. See you there! Gregg
Reply Retweet पसंत केले
Gregg Jarrett २१ फेब्रु
I’ll be on Hannity tonight “Live” from the CPAC convention in Washington area (at the Gaylord National). If you’re around, drop by to watch the program! Gregg
Reply Retweet पसंत केले
Gregg Jarrett ३ फेब्रु
A 2nd source has now confirmed to me that, in a meeting on January 10, Deputy A-G Rosenstein used the power of his office to threaten to subpoena the calls & texts of the Intel Committee to get it to stop it’s investigation of DOJ and FBI. Likely an Abuse of Power & Obstruction.
Reply Retweet पसंत केले
Gregg Jarrett ३ फेब्रु
Again, if true, Rosenstein’s action was an illegal abuse of power and he should no longer serve as Deputy Attorney General. He allegedly used threats to try to stop the Intelligence Committee from exposing wrongful behavior in an attempt to cover it up.
Reply Retweet पसंत केले
Gregg Jarrett ३ फेब्रु
Nunes was exercising his constitutional oversight authority by investigating alleged wrongdoing in the FBI and DOJ. Rosenstein, according to the source, threatened to use his power to retaliate against Nunes and others in an effort to intimidate them and stop their legal efforts
Reply Retweet पसंत केले
Gregg Jarrett ३ फेब्रु
It is a crime for a government official to use his office to threaten anyone, including a member of Congress, for exercising a constitutionally protected right. See 18 USC 242 and other similar abuse of power statutes.
Reply Retweet पसंत केले
Gregg Jarrett ३ फेब्रु
In a meeting with Chairman Devin Nunes, FBI Director Christopher Wray and others, the source says that Rosenstein threatened to subpoena the texts and emails of Congress because he was”tired of dealing with the Intelligence Committee.” If true, Rosenstein must resign or be fired
Reply Retweet पसंत केले