Twitter | Rechercher | |
Gunar Olsen
Journalist/writer, or something. Bylines . Former intern. Cofounder .
9 280
Tweets
1 922
Abonné
693
Abonnés
Tweets
Gunar Olsen 13 h
The extent to which liberal groups speak out against US war is limited to hand-wringing over how humanely the war is conducted—not to be mistaken for opposition to the war itself. Great reporting by in
Reply Retweet Aimer
Gunar Olsen 23 déc.
The Cold War was a "a redistribution of violence, so that the great powers saw proportionately less of it and the weaker states proportionately more." —Daniel Immerwahr in on Paul Thomas Chamerlin's book-length rebuttal of the "long peace"
Reply Retweet Aimer
Gunar Olsen 22 déc.
En réponse à @jncatron
Thanks for sharing, Joe!
Reply Retweet Aimer
Gunar Olsen 22 déc.
In my⁩ Q&A w ⁦⁩, he explained that the war in Yemen is about “maximizing the return from the scramble for the last bits of liquidity in the world” and “undermining the capacity of the people’s ability to resist.“ Read the rest⁩ here:
Reply Retweet Aimer
Gunar Olsen a Retweeté
Chase Madar 21 déc.
Hillary Clinton May be impressively plastic in many respects but her belief in the Forever War, which she has been so instrumental in starting and restarting, is 110% authentic
Reply Retweet Aimer
Gunar Olsen 21 déc.
Reply Retweet Aimer
Gunar Olsen 21 déc.
The war in Yemen is not a civil or proxy war. It‘s “a century-long campaign to subordinate and integrate it into an increasingly intertwined system known as globalization or neoliberal global economy.” My Q&A with ⁦⁩ in ⁦⁩:
Reply Retweet Aimer
Gunar Olsen a Retweeté
David Marcus 20 déc.
“The 45 years of peace between the Cold War’s superpowers were also 45 years of killing for much of the rest of the world.” Daniel Immerwahr in on a new history of the Cold War
Reply Retweet Aimer
Gunar Olsen a Retweeté
Stephen Wertheim 20 déc.
"The 45 years of peace between the Cold War's superpowers that Gaddis praised were also 45 years of killing for much of the rest of the world." Daniel Immerwahr on Paul Chamberlin's bracing book, The Cold War's Killing Fields, in :
Reply Retweet Aimer
Gunar Olsen a Retweeté
Stephen Wertheim 20 déc.
En réponse à @stephenwertheim
For most of humanity, the heyday of the "liberal international order" looks more like this map of mass conflicts in which the superpowers made their mark:
Reply Retweet Aimer
Gunar Olsen 20 déc.
En réponse à @GunarOlsen
Really enjoyed Salim Yaqub’s classic book on how the Eisenhower Doctrine was designed not only to protect the Middle East from Soviet encroachment, but also to contain Nasser’s radical Arab nationalism by strengthening the pro-Western tendencies of the conservative Arab states.
Reply Retweet Aimer
Gunar Olsen a Retweeté
miguel salazar 18 déc.
For , I wrote about white liberal guilt, class voyeurism, and the parallels between 's Y Tu Mamá También and ROMA
Reply Retweet Aimer
Gunar Olsen a Retweeté
Samuel Moyn 17 déc.
"What is law school for?" -- this free link is good for one week... Have at it -- this piece is dubious at best.
Reply Retweet Aimer
Gunar Olsen a Retweeté
Brad Simpson 16 déc.
20 yrs ago today on December 16, 1998 Pres. Bill Clinton launched Operation Desert Fox, an illegal, unjustified military attack on Iraq in which the US attacked 100 targets with cruise missiles. I there in the middle of the bombing to witness its effects. Here's my story 1/
Reply Retweet Aimer
Gunar Olsen a Retweeté
Brad Simpson 15 déc.
The US sells nearly 60% of the world’s weapons. There is hardly a conflict on earth where US weapons makers aren’t profiting from the deaths of innocents. Any truly progressive foreign policy must take as a starting point a dramatic reduction of US military sales and assistance.
Reply Retweet Aimer
Gunar Olsen a Retweeté
Evan Hill 13 déc.
New from me in : Today's historic Yemen vote, with Khashoggi as its catalyst, offers an important lesson for the left's foreign policy: The outrage of a well-informed public can constrain our leaders' worst impulses
Reply Retweet Aimer
Gunar Olsen a Retweeté
Micah Zenko 12 déc.
Must-buy! During the Cold War, the US attempted 69 different regime changes. Only 6 were overt (using military force), while 63 were covert (assassinating leaders, sponsoring coups, manipulating electoral results, or covertly aiding dissidents).
Reply Retweet Aimer
Gunar Olsen 12 déc.
Good column by ⁦⁩ on Sanders’ and Warren’s contributions to the growing foreign policy debate.
Reply Retweet Aimer
Gunar Olsen 12 déc.
The dominant narrative that Obama "failed to intervene" in Syria gets the story all wrong, drastically obscuring how responsible the CIA's arm-and-equip program was for ultimately escalating the conflict. gets it right in :
Reply Retweet Aimer
Gunar Olsen 11 déc.
I added a page on my website to keep track of the times I’ve asked powerful people difficult questions in public. Despite the page’s title, I don’t like self congratulation. But I do like making lists & keeping track of things, so this is what that’s about
Reply Retweet Aimer