In case you never visited the defunct links RonPaulMessage14.com or RonPaulMessage88.com because his websites were being censored and shut down, the world is not a very stable place. The new world order will soon collapse and things will get a lot less nicer, and to survive we need to be even less nicer. I’ll keep it brief for now. We need to stock up on food, ammo, weapons, materials, books and kill shots if we want to avoid dying from the hardest collapse and most dramatic societal change since going into the digital age, or even since the industrial revolution.

Most people believe we only have to survive a financial collapse, which is true in the short run. Fractional reserve banking was legalized and became the founding principle for the bank of England. This sped the development of technology at first, but now it speeds the degradation of society. We see alas too late that it’s going too fast – towards a cliff off a planetary-sized mountain – and really, technology has always advanced too fast for human races. Once resources become too tight, the US dollar will collapse and so will all economies. I believe this will occur before 2020.

We have another problem that can happen in our lifetime which we never dreamt of – solar flares. Being anywhere near metal when they make Earthfall is where concern lies. The tiny 1859 Carrington event still caused major problems for telegraph stations, which were the biggest conductors for electricity back then, and gave electric shocks to operators. But every five or six thousand years, a storm hits like clockwork that’s about 10,000 times stronger than the Carrington sun storm. That’s many times stronger than an EMP. Now, multiply that by how much metal and other electricity conducting technology we use in 2016. Raising an eyebrow yet? It would probably wipe out untold numbers of the population, which is really what the Earth needs to prevent its desolation.

Finally, an occurence that isn’t so pressing: we are entering a new ice age. Officials still favor global warming mania over genuine studies. Every ice age for the last 1.5-2.5 million years follows the same pattern: ice ages last for around 100,000 years each, separated by warmer interglacial periods of 10-12,000 years. Well, now… it’s been 12,000 years. Reports are surfacing of gradual cooling and glaciation whose rate indicates the ice age will fully return by the end of this millenium. Even an unusually cold period similar to the one from 1645-1715 is predicted to begin by 2030.

Most are only aware of the financial crisis as a challenger to the reign of Jewry’s international monarchy, but they don’t realize there’s actually three contenders. A super solar storm could very well send its few survivors back to the stone age in a flash, and a “mini ice age” will most likely cull the population even if the worldwide meltdown has not happened by then. The good news is that non-Europeans do not survive long in the extreme cold, and not even all the “sunshine vitamins” in the world can save them. Any of these events alone could disrupt civilization as we know it. But when all three happen, it will certainly end. This is probably why most evidence of past technology or advancement disappears every ice age. We’ll be forced to live a low-tech lifestyle as nomads hunting and gathering in the eternal winter wilderness.

Animis opibusque parati – prepare in minds and resources (be ready for anything).

(Originally posted on MurderByMedia [Before he got shoahed the first time.])

I’ve become rather adept at spotting Jews and am going to share my tips, sources being experience, old German/Russian texts, and true stereotypes. NOTE: these features are not seen in all Jews, but are recurring traits and commonly seen. Some Jews may have none of these.

Ironically the hooked nose is among the least consistent features of a Jew, many of them have either bred it out or gotten plastic surgery. The Jew nose is easily confused with a Roman nose, the difference being a Jew nose archs up at a point and then slopes down at a more acute angle, the Roman nose archs up and then more gradually slopes down to a horizontal, flat “bottom”. There is far less incline and horizontal protrusion in a Roman nose, the Jew nose is a more drastic incline and generally protrudes further outwards.

Another trait that is common especially among male Jews is “fleshy” or “baggy” skin under their eye, they’re more likely to have “wrinkles” directly under their eye even at a young age.

A third trait is a prominent, or protruding lower lip, although this is particularly seen is more “masculine” looking Jews, and is rarer due to it being bred out over time.

A fourth trait is prominent, protruding, “elephant” ears, seen in the likes of Paul Reuben.

More qualities of a Jew include a short stature, awkward non-athletic body, and sunken eyes. Dark brown, beady eyes are the most common eye color of a Jew, although Jews may have eye colors of any types. A weak jaw line is common among Jews. Receding hairlines are very common among older male Jews. Among Hasidics and young male Jews, pale skin is very common, because they rarely go outside. If you see a prominent figure who appears to be white but just appears “off”, or strange, I found it’s a good rule of thumb to assume their Jewish, and are either inbred or undergone plastic surgery (which is another BIG trait among wealthier Jews, plastic surgery).

Dark hair that ranges from tightly curled to frizzy to wavy is a common Jewish trait. Jews with this hair patronize only Jewish barbers because Gentiles can’t cut it right. Men often wear it close-cropped to fit in better with the white goyim.

Bellis, Rabbi Martin, Trotsky, Brother Nathaniel honorary goy, Adam Sandler, Anne Franke, Gesnler, and Zuckerberg all have classic Jewish hair.

Keep in mind that unmixed white people with black hair are almost nonexistent. Southern Europeans with a bit of moorish blood have that black straight hair, as do whites and latinos with south American Indian in them. If they have black hair and no tint to their skin at all you’re looking at a Jew.

<a href=”http://uptowncollective.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/Anthony-Weiner-Sexter.jpg“>Anthony Weiner</a> is one of the most horrifying kikes I have seen! (Even his nose looks like a shark swimming straight at you!)

My Strategy:

1 – Pattern recognition: by trying to see similarity with a known jew.

When one looks at and studies pictures of a large number of jews in mainstream culture (like the pics posted here), and familiarzes himself with their facial features, it would be easy to spot the new ones. Oh, this guy looks like CuckRogan, and CuckRogan is a Jew, bingo!

2 – By elimination: For Scandinavia, Germany, Britain: I ask myself, does this person look like pure Brit/Nordic/German? If not, candidate for being a Jew. eg: Jack Straw, Miliband brothers.

3 – Imagine the person with a Yarmulke (skull cap).

Hard to spot: Scarlet Johansen types are tricky. (false positive: Murdoch?) Jews are gene stealers. I believe Jews looked like Arabs before they went to Europe centuries ago. But what did the original semite looked like? (Probably like <a href=”http://new.rejesus.co.uk/images/area_uploads/faces/faces_bbc.jpg“>this guy</a> who they say was Jesus based on various nearby random remains… let’s bathe in this presumptuous conviction.)

Eloquent speakers and erudite writers alike already walk a tight rope and, to prevent an audience’s boredom, also juggle with being concise by bearing multa paucis in mind, meaning “say much in few words”. I am naturally wordy and repetitive (I’m more of a speaker) so especially I need to apply this principle.

I read old books and behold art before our time, and language back then was superior to ours. I understand so much better with so little, it’s shocking. My fascination with early modern English, its best representative, comes not from its peculiar grammar and syntax but how richer it is to those studying it.

The King James Bible, Shakespeare’s complete works, Ford’s Translation of Mein Kampf, and Wagner’s Ring, whose DVD translation from the 1990 performance at the New York Met all blew me away as impeccable examples of written English and it still affects how I write.

Anyhow, I researched and realized that all languages have devolved over time, explaining why it seems weird when it’s actually challenging. Languages were passed down orally until recently (4,000 years ago), and as we genetically dull and weaken, comprehension of even modern language fades and we only need to watch teenagers spell and hear black people talk to be convinced.

The further back in language “development” we go, the richer words and grammar became. We also had words for things and concepts we don’t use commonly use. One such example is “love”, which used to have separate terms for reproductive love, biological love, tough love, divine love, love for nature, and so forth… and replaced it with just “love”. So they fall into disuse. We would now also say “What else do you want to know?” or “Do you know enough yet or what?”… rather than just “Would you know more?”.

We had more of what it took to master our tongue in ancient times. We used fewer terms with filler and more well-chosen words with more meaning. We adopted what made sense even if it hadn’t existed. If you still don’t follow, then my unpracticed language naturally sucks. The earliest known version of any language is the richest <em>and</em> the simplest. There’s a reason Shakespeare’s influence on English hasn’t been surpassed even after 400 years.

Languages don’t evolve: they either stay rich and complex or degenerate (over decades) because its natives lack the mental capacity or the incentive to learn them properly.
– Varg Vikernes of Burzum