Alan Dershowitzتصدیق شدہ اکاؤنٹ

@AlanDersh

Professor at Harvard Law School for 50 years, now emeritus. Active in litigation, writing, and defense of civil liberties and human rights.

Cambridge, MA
ستمبر 2011 کو شامل ہوئے
35 تصاویر اور ویڈیوز تصاویر اور ویڈیوز

ٹویٹس

آپ نے @AlanDersh کو بلاک کردیا

کیا آپ واقعی یہ ٹویٹس دیکھنا چاہتے ہیں؟ ٹویٹس دیکھنے سے @AlanDersh ان بلاک نہیں ہوگا

  1. 22 گھنٹے پہلے

    49 جوابات 103 ریٹویٹس 388 پسندیدگیاں
    منسوخ
  2. 23 گھنٹے پہلے

    It is McCarthyism to accuse a lawyer of dirt for representing a despised client. That’s exactly what Joe Mccarthy used to do. Do you want us to back to that terrible time?

    You were ’s lawyer. You agreed to represent him. Too late to shake off the dirt.
    481 جوابات 1,014 ریٹویٹس 4,733 پسندیدگیاں
    منسوخ
  3. 23 گھنٹے پہلے

    I’m sure you would have favored a right of reply by Hillary Clinton to Comey’s expression of his critical views. 2/2

    35 جوابات 61 ریٹویٹس 536 پسندیدگیاں
    یہ تھریڈ دکھائیں
    یہ تھریڈ دکھائیں
    منسوخ
  4. 23 گھنٹے پہلے

    If a prosecutor indicts/announces that he won’t indict, there's no need for a simultaneous rebuttal. But if a prosecutor publishes his critical views beyond that, fairness dictates a right of reply.1/2

    . is way off base. Nobody has a “due process” right to counter a detailed indictment with a “simultaneous” rebuttal: a right to rebut comes later, at trial in court. If Trump is immune to indictment, that right comes later, at a Senate trial if and when he’s impeached.
    52 جوابات 134 ریٹویٹس 556 پسندیدگیاں
    یہ تھریڈ دکھائیں
    یہ تھریڈ دکھائیں
    منسوخ
  5. 22 فروری

    The judge did not find that the non-prosecution agreement or plea bargain broke any rules. That is all I was involved with as Epstein’s defense lawyer.

    3,037 جوابات 535 ریٹویٹس 2,873 پسندیدگیاں
    منسوخ
  6. 16 فروری

    Congress has authority to rescind Tump emergency. It can amend emergency power law to exclude expenditures not authorized by Congress. It will take bipartisan support but Trump is circumventing constitutional grant of power to congress to authorize expenditures.

    715 جوابات 421 ریٹویٹس 1,672 پسندیدگیاں
    منسوخ
  7. 15 فروری

    It is unconstitutional to use the 25th Amendment to circumvent impeachment provisions. The 25th can be used only if POTUS is physically or psychiatrically incapacitated. Any other use is unconstitutional. I challenge anyone to argue differently.

    12,493 جوابات 16,648 ریٹویٹس 48,228 پسندیدگیاں
    منسوخ
  8. 15 فروری

    Let’s assume the president of the United States was in bed with the Russians, committed treason, committed obstruction of justice. The 25th Amendment is simply irrelevant to that.

    426 جوابات 702 ریٹویٹس 3,018 پسندیدگیاں
    منسوخ
  9. 11 فروری

    Investigating the National Enquirer for extortion raises concerns regarding the First Amendment which needs breathing room and applies equally to tabloids and to the Times. See attached abc interview.

    343 جوابات 262 ریٹویٹس 865 پسندیدگیاں
    منسوخ
  10. 8 فروری

    I’m waiting to read attacks on the next Dem. president whose investigated by a special counsel and his defense of that special counsel. I suspect he'll be silent. His critiques are all partisan. He fails the shoe on the other foot test of morality and equal justice

    CONCLUSION/ I've *never* said—and would *never* say—I'm the only attorney folks should read. Read *all* the attorneys and investigators—even read , who's disagreed with by the rest of us. But if you're quoting Trump Jr. on a complex federal investigation, grow up. /end
    یہ تھریڈ دکھائیں
    658 جوابات 579 ریٹویٹس 2,135 پسندیدگیاں
    منسوخ
  11. 7 فروری

    I’m pleased that there will be a full investigation which will prove that the accusations against me were made up for financial reasons. I will fully cooperate with the investigation because I have nothing to hide.

    600 جوابات 1,743 ریٹویٹس 5,474 پسندیدگیاں
    منسوخ
  12. 6 فروری

    Henry Ford devoted his life to two passions: making cars and demonizing Jews.

    291 جوابات 447 ریٹویٹس 1,260 پسندیدگیاں
    منسوخ
  13. 5 فروری

    I also wish he would pass the shoe on the other foot test: would he tweeting as much and as angrily if Clinton has been elected and these tactics were being used against her? I leave that to the readers to judge. FINAL/

    126 جوابات 326 ریٹویٹس 1,782 پسندیدگیاں
    یہ تھریڈ دکھائیں
    یہ تھریڈ دکھائیں
    منسوخ
  14. 5 فروری

    I just wish he were not so results oriented in his get-Trump-at-any-cost approach regardless of the implications for civil liberties. 3/

    38 جوابات 209 ریٹویٹس 1,378 پسندیدگیاں
    یہ تھریڈ دکھائیں
    یہ تھریڈ دکھائیں
    منسوخ
  15. 5 فروری

    If after completing his investigation, Mueller comes up with no one in this core category, will admit I make an important point? Im sure Abramson deserved his grade and I commend him for thinking for himself. 2/

    27 جوابات 162 ریٹویٹس 722 پسندیدگیاں
    یہ تھریڈ دکھائیں
    یہ تھریڈ دکھائیں
    منسوخ
  16. 5 فروری

    In his multiple tweets, avoids responding to my challenge: name one American who Mueller has charged with unlawfully conspiring with Russia to influence the 2016 election. I have patience. 1/

    (THREAD) To his credit, likes a spirited debate as much as I do. So here is "Round 2" of our debate on whether Robert Mueller is the most professional, admirable, and successful federal prosecutor of this century thus far—which he is. I hope you'll read on and retweet.
    یہ تھریڈ دکھائیں
    301 جوابات 1,924 ریٹویٹس 4,949 پسندیدگیاں
    یہ تھریڈ دکھائیں
    یہ تھریڈ دکھائیں
    منسوخ
  17. 5 فروری

    This misrepresents my feelings on the matter. I have written that process crimes are “serious” but they are secondary to Mueller's primary mandate.

    154 جوابات 291 ریٹویٹس 1,480 پسندیدگیاں
    منسوخ
  18. 2 فروری

    Some of my highest grades were given to students who fundamentally disagreed w/ me. Abramson is projecting how he evaluates facts & arguments. If you agree politically you “find” the law and facts differently than if you disagree. That’s not the way I evaluate students or issues.

    94 جوابات 115 ریٹویٹس 840 پسندیدگیاں
    یہ تھریڈ دکھائیں
    یہ تھریڈ دکھائیں
    منسوخ
  19. 2 فروری

    Abramson concluded his screed with a lie that typifies his mendacious approach to “facts.” He suspects that I gave him a good grade “because he felt I think as he does.” Anyone who knows me can attest that I would never grade based on whether a student thinks as I do. 7/

    40 جوابات 101 ریٹویٹس 724 پسندیدگیاں
    یہ تھریڈ دکھائیں
    یہ تھریڈ دکھائیں
    منسوخ
  20. 2 فروری

    I challenge him to dispute this pattern in which “nearly all” of the charges “fall into 3 categories.” I urge all readers to read the attached article to determine whether he has fairly represented my actual argument, or has instead constructed a strawman

    28 جوابات 124 ریٹویٹس 363 پسندیدگیاں
    یہ تھریڈ دکھائیں
    یہ تھریڈ دکھائیں
    منسوخ

@AlanDersh نے اب تک ٹویٹ نہیں کی ہے۔

لوڈنگ میں وقت لگ رہا ہے.

ٹوئٹر گنجائش سے زیادہ بوجھ یا ایک وقتی مشکل سے دوچار ہے۔ دوبارہ کوشش کریں یا مزید معلومات کے لیے ">ٹوئٹر اسٹیٹس پر جائیں۔

    آپ کو بھی پسند ہو

    ·