Post has attachment
#NationalSecurity it's the perfect Government's pretext to hide its crimes!

Commenting is disabled for this post.
Post has attachment
In December, the Defense Department declassified two videos documenting encounters between U.S. Navy F-18 fighters and unidentified aircraft. The first video captures multiple pilots observing and discussing a strange, hovering, egg-shaped craft, apparently one of a “fleet” of such objects, according to cockpit audio. The second shows a similar incident involving an F-18 attached to the USS Nimitz carrier battle group in 2004.
The videos, along with observations by pilots and radar operators, appear to provide evidence of the existence of aircraft far superior to anything possessed by the United States or its allies. Defense Department officials who analyze the relevant intelligence confirm more than a dozen such incidents off the East Coast alone since 2015. In another recent case, the Air Force launched F-15 fighters last October in a failed attempt to intercept an unidentified high-speed aircraft looping over the Pacific Northwest .
A third declassified video, released by To the Stars Academy of Arts and Science , a privately owned media and scientific research company to which I’m an adviser, reveals a previously undisclosed Navy encounter that occurred off the East Coast in 2015.
Is it possible that America has been technologically leap-frogged by Russia or China? Or, as many people wondered after the videos were first published by the New York Times in December, might they be evidence of some alien civilization?
Unfortunately, we have no idea, because we aren’t even seeking answers.
I served as deputy assistant secretary of defense for intelligence for the Clinton and George W. Bush administrations and as staff director for the Senate Intelligence Committee, and I know from numerous discussions with Pentagon officials over the past two years that military departments and agencies treat such incidents as isolated events rather than as part of a pattern requiring serious attention and investigation. A colleague of mine at To the Stars Academy, Luis Elizondo, used to run a Pentagon intelligence program that examined evidence of “anomalous” aircraft, but he resigned last fall to protest government inattention to the growing body of empirical data.
Meanwhile, reports from different services and agencies remain largely ignored and unevaluated inside their respective bureaucratic stovepipes. There is no Pentagon process for synthesizing all the observations the military is making. The current approach is equivalent to having the Army conduct a submarine search without the Navy. It is also reminiscent of the counterterrorism efforts of the CIA and the FBI before Sept. 11, 2001, when each had information on the hijackers that they kept to themselves. In this instance, the truth may ultimately prove benign, but why leave it to chance?
(A Pentagon spokesman did not respond to requests from The Washington Post for comment, but in December, the military confirmed the existence of a program to investigate UFOs and said it had stopped funding the research in 2012.)
The military personnel who are encountering these phenomena
tell remarkable stories. In one example, over the course of two weeks in November 2004, the USS Princeton, a guided-missile cruiser operating advanced naval radar, repeatedly detected unidentified aircraft operating in and around the Nimitz carrier battle group, which it was guarding off the coast of San Diego. In some cases, according to incident reports and interviews with military personnel, these vehicles descended from altitudes higher than 60,000 feet at supersonic speeds, only to suddenly stop and hover as low as 50 feet above the ocean. The United States possesses nothing capable of such feats.
On at least two occasions, F-18 fighters were guided to intercept these vehicles and were able to verify their location, appearance and performance. Notably, these encounters occurred in broad daylight and were independently monitored by radars aboard multiple ships and aircraft. According to naval aviators I have spoken with at length, the vehicles were roughly 45 feet long and white. Yet these mysterious aircraft easily sped away from and outmaneuvered America’s front-line fighters without a discernible means of propulsion.
From my work with To the Stars Academy, which seeks to raise private funds to investigate incidents like the 2004 Nimitz encounter, I know they continue to occur, because we are being approached by military personnel who are concerned about national security and frustrated by how the Defense Department is handling such reports. I am also familiar with the evidence as a former Pentagon intelligence official and a consultant who began researching the issue after the Nimitz incident was brought to my attention. On several occasions, I have met with senior Pentagon officials, and at least one followed up and obtained briefings confirming incidents such as the Nimitz case. But nobody wants to be “the alien guy” in the national security bureaucracy; nobody wants to be ridiculed or sidelined for drawing attention to the issue. This is true up and down the chain of command, and it is a serious and recurring impediment to progress.
If the origin of these aircraft is a mystery, so is the paralysis of the U.S. government in the face of such evidence. Sixty years ago, when the Soviet Union put the first manmade satellite in orbit, Americans recoiled at the idea of being technologically surpassed by a dangerous rival, and the furor over Sputnik ultimately produced the space race. Americans responded vigorously, and a little more than a decade later, Neil Armstrong set foot on the moon. If these craft mean that Russia, China or some other nation is concealing an astonishing technological breakthrough to quietly extend its lead, surely we should respond as we did then. Perhaps Russian President Vladi¬mir Putin’s recent chest-thumping claims about propulsion breakthroughs are not pure braggadocio. Or, if these craft really aren’t from Earth, then the need to figure out what they are is even more urgent.
Lately, media coverage of the issue of unidentified aerial vehicles has focused on an expired $22 million congressional earmark for Bigelow Aerospace, a contractor with ties to former Senate Democratic leader Harry Reid (Nev.). The money mostly funded research and analysis by that contractor, without participation from the Air Force, NORAD or other key military organizations. The real issue, though, is not a long-gone earmark, helpful though it may have been, but numerous recent incidents involving the military and violations of U.S. airspace. It is time to set aside taboos regarding “UFOs” and instead listen to our pilots and radar operators.
Within a roughly $50 billion annual intelligence budget, money is not the issue. Existing funds would easily cover what’s needed to look into the incidents. What we lack above all is recognition that this issue warrants a serious collection and analysis effort. To make headway, the task needs to be assigned to an official with the clout to compel collaboration among disparate and often quarrelsome national security bureaucracies. A truly serious effort would involve, among other things, analysts able to review infrared satellite data, NORAD radar databases, and signals and human intelligence reporting. Congress should require an all-source study by the secretary of defense while promoting research into new forms of propulsion that might explain how these vehicles achieve such extraordinary power and maneuverability.
As with Sputnik, the national security implications of these incidents are concerning — but the scientific opportunities are thrilling. Who knows what perils we may avoid or opportunities we might identify if we follow the data? We cannot afford to avert our eyes, given the risk of strategic surprise. The future belongs to not only the physically brave but also the intellectually agile.
#strategicsurprise #Sputnik #NationalSecurity #defense #UFO #TotheStarsAcademy #NORAD #BigelowAerospace
https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/the-military-keeps-encountering-ufos-why-doesnt-the-pentagon-care/2018/03/09/242c125c-22ee-11e8-94da-ebf9d112159c_story.html?utm_term=.cd59376a2de5
The videos, along with observations by pilots and radar operators, appear to provide evidence of the existence of aircraft far superior to anything possessed by the United States or its allies. Defense Department officials who analyze the relevant intelligence confirm more than a dozen such incidents off the East Coast alone since 2015. In another recent case, the Air Force launched F-15 fighters last October in a failed attempt to intercept an unidentified high-speed aircraft looping over the Pacific Northwest .
A third declassified video, released by To the Stars Academy of Arts and Science , a privately owned media and scientific research company to which I’m an adviser, reveals a previously undisclosed Navy encounter that occurred off the East Coast in 2015.
Is it possible that America has been technologically leap-frogged by Russia or China? Or, as many people wondered after the videos were first published by the New York Times in December, might they be evidence of some alien civilization?
Unfortunately, we have no idea, because we aren’t even seeking answers.
I served as deputy assistant secretary of defense for intelligence for the Clinton and George W. Bush administrations and as staff director for the Senate Intelligence Committee, and I know from numerous discussions with Pentagon officials over the past two years that military departments and agencies treat such incidents as isolated events rather than as part of a pattern requiring serious attention and investigation. A colleague of mine at To the Stars Academy, Luis Elizondo, used to run a Pentagon intelligence program that examined evidence of “anomalous” aircraft, but he resigned last fall to protest government inattention to the growing body of empirical data.
Meanwhile, reports from different services and agencies remain largely ignored and unevaluated inside their respective bureaucratic stovepipes. There is no Pentagon process for synthesizing all the observations the military is making. The current approach is equivalent to having the Army conduct a submarine search without the Navy. It is also reminiscent of the counterterrorism efforts of the CIA and the FBI before Sept. 11, 2001, when each had information on the hijackers that they kept to themselves. In this instance, the truth may ultimately prove benign, but why leave it to chance?
(A Pentagon spokesman did not respond to requests from The Washington Post for comment, but in December, the military confirmed the existence of a program to investigate UFOs and said it had stopped funding the research in 2012.)
The military personnel who are encountering these phenomena
tell remarkable stories. In one example, over the course of two weeks in November 2004, the USS Princeton, a guided-missile cruiser operating advanced naval radar, repeatedly detected unidentified aircraft operating in and around the Nimitz carrier battle group, which it was guarding off the coast of San Diego. In some cases, according to incident reports and interviews with military personnel, these vehicles descended from altitudes higher than 60,000 feet at supersonic speeds, only to suddenly stop and hover as low as 50 feet above the ocean. The United States possesses nothing capable of such feats.
On at least two occasions, F-18 fighters were guided to intercept these vehicles and were able to verify their location, appearance and performance. Notably, these encounters occurred in broad daylight and were independently monitored by radars aboard multiple ships and aircraft. According to naval aviators I have spoken with at length, the vehicles were roughly 45 feet long and white. Yet these mysterious aircraft easily sped away from and outmaneuvered America’s front-line fighters without a discernible means of propulsion.
From my work with To the Stars Academy, which seeks to raise private funds to investigate incidents like the 2004 Nimitz encounter, I know they continue to occur, because we are being approached by military personnel who are concerned about national security and frustrated by how the Defense Department is handling such reports. I am also familiar with the evidence as a former Pentagon intelligence official and a consultant who began researching the issue after the Nimitz incident was brought to my attention. On several occasions, I have met with senior Pentagon officials, and at least one followed up and obtained briefings confirming incidents such as the Nimitz case. But nobody wants to be “the alien guy” in the national security bureaucracy; nobody wants to be ridiculed or sidelined for drawing attention to the issue. This is true up and down the chain of command, and it is a serious and recurring impediment to progress.
If the origin of these aircraft is a mystery, so is the paralysis of the U.S. government in the face of such evidence. Sixty years ago, when the Soviet Union put the first manmade satellite in orbit, Americans recoiled at the idea of being technologically surpassed by a dangerous rival, and the furor over Sputnik ultimately produced the space race. Americans responded vigorously, and a little more than a decade later, Neil Armstrong set foot on the moon. If these craft mean that Russia, China or some other nation is concealing an astonishing technological breakthrough to quietly extend its lead, surely we should respond as we did then. Perhaps Russian President Vladi¬mir Putin’s recent chest-thumping claims about propulsion breakthroughs are not pure braggadocio. Or, if these craft really aren’t from Earth, then the need to figure out what they are is even more urgent.
Lately, media coverage of the issue of unidentified aerial vehicles has focused on an expired $22 million congressional earmark for Bigelow Aerospace, a contractor with ties to former Senate Democratic leader Harry Reid (Nev.). The money mostly funded research and analysis by that contractor, without participation from the Air Force, NORAD or other key military organizations. The real issue, though, is not a long-gone earmark, helpful though it may have been, but numerous recent incidents involving the military and violations of U.S. airspace. It is time to set aside taboos regarding “UFOs” and instead listen to our pilots and radar operators.
Within a roughly $50 billion annual intelligence budget, money is not the issue. Existing funds would easily cover what’s needed to look into the incidents. What we lack above all is recognition that this issue warrants a serious collection and analysis effort. To make headway, the task needs to be assigned to an official with the clout to compel collaboration among disparate and often quarrelsome national security bureaucracies. A truly serious effort would involve, among other things, analysts able to review infrared satellite data, NORAD radar databases, and signals and human intelligence reporting. Congress should require an all-source study by the secretary of defense while promoting research into new forms of propulsion that might explain how these vehicles achieve such extraordinary power and maneuverability.
As with Sputnik, the national security implications of these incidents are concerning — but the scientific opportunities are thrilling. Who knows what perils we may avoid or opportunities we might identify if we follow the data? We cannot afford to avert our eyes, given the risk of strategic surprise. The future belongs to not only the physically brave but also the intellectually agile.
#strategicsurprise #Sputnik #NationalSecurity #defense #UFO #TotheStarsAcademy #NORAD #BigelowAerospace
https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/the-military-keeps-encountering-ufos-why-doesnt-the-pentagon-care/2018/03/09/242c125c-22ee-11e8-94da-ebf9d112159c_story.html?utm_term=.cd59376a2de5
Add a comment...
Post has attachment
Public
#Australia invokes national security while lobbying Donald Trump for trade tariff exemption #aluminum #america #armedforces #commodities #defence #defense #donaldjtrump #donaldtrump #fairfaxmedia #finance #financialmarkets #gop #government #grandoldparty #investing #jimmattis #juliebishop #malcolmturnbull #marysepayne #military #mining #nationalsecurity #peternavarro #politics #presidentdonaldjtrump #presidentdonaldtrump #presidenttrump #primeministermalcolmturnbull #primeministerturnbull #republican #republicanparty #republicans #securities #security #socialmedia #steel #steveciobo #stocks #tariffs #thedonald #trade #trumpadministration #twitter #unitedstatess #unitedstatesofamerica #us #usa #ustradewar #wilburross
Post has attachment
Public
Deep Fakes: A Looming Crisis for National Security, Democracy and Privacy?
https://www.lawfareblog.com/deep-fakes-looming-crisis-national-security-democracy-and-privacy #AI #socialmedia #biometrics #cybersecurity #nationalsecurity #privacy #bot #bots
https://www.lawfareblog.com/deep-fakes-looming-crisis-national-security-democracy-and-privacy #AI #socialmedia #biometrics #cybersecurity #nationalsecurity #privacy #bot #bots
Add a comment...
Post has attachment
National security bill tabled in Ukraine's parliament
Chairman of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine Andriy Parubiy says the bill on national security in Ukraine has been tabled in parliament.
"The most important bill on national security has just been submitted to the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine," he said while opening the parliament's session, an UNIAN correspondent reports.
He said the bill is a priority and he was immediately sending it to the committee for consideration.
"And I order to consider it without delay. This [draft] law is very important at a time when Ukraine is fighting against Russian aggression," Parubiy said.
In his words, the bill is important both for security sector reform and as a significant step towards accession to NATO.
He expressed the hope for early consideration of the draft law, which was submitted by the president.
The parliament's website has already published information about presidential bill on national security of Ukraine (No. 8068) registered today, February 28, but its copy has not yet been made public.
It is the parliament's National Security and Defense Committee that will have its final say on the bill. It will also be considered by the committees on legislative support of law enforcement, regulations, budget issues, preventing and combating corruption, as well as on European integration.
As UNIAN reported earlier, U.S. Secretary of Defense James Mattis at a meeting with Ukrainian Defense Minister Stepan Poltorak in the Pentagon on February 3 called for the adoption of the law "On National Security of Ukraine," containing provisions on the introduction of civilian control over the nation's security and defense sector.
On February 20, Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko said he would submit a draft law on national security to the Verkhovna Rada within a week. According to the president, the bill will streamline cooperation between Ukraine and NATO.
#Ukraine #VerkhovnaRada #bill #nationalsecurity #president #RussianAggression #NATO #news
Chairman of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine Andriy Parubiy says the bill on national security in Ukraine has been tabled in parliament.
"The most important bill on national security has just been submitted to the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine," he said while opening the parliament's session, an UNIAN correspondent reports.
He said the bill is a priority and he was immediately sending it to the committee for consideration.
"And I order to consider it without delay. This [draft] law is very important at a time when Ukraine is fighting against Russian aggression," Parubiy said.
In his words, the bill is important both for security sector reform and as a significant step towards accession to NATO.
He expressed the hope for early consideration of the draft law, which was submitted by the president.
The parliament's website has already published information about presidential bill on national security of Ukraine (No. 8068) registered today, February 28, but its copy has not yet been made public.
It is the parliament's National Security and Defense Committee that will have its final say on the bill. It will also be considered by the committees on legislative support of law enforcement, regulations, budget issues, preventing and combating corruption, as well as on European integration.
As UNIAN reported earlier, U.S. Secretary of Defense James Mattis at a meeting with Ukrainian Defense Minister Stepan Poltorak in the Pentagon on February 3 called for the adoption of the law "On National Security of Ukraine," containing provisions on the introduction of civilian control over the nation's security and defense sector.
On February 20, Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko said he would submit a draft law on national security to the Verkhovna Rada within a week. According to the president, the bill will streamline cooperation between Ukraine and NATO.
#Ukraine #VerkhovnaRada #bill #nationalsecurity #president #RussianAggression #NATO #news

Add a comment...
Post has attachment
#misandry #malemisandry #mobbing #rumourspread
#LGBTI #domesticviolence #femaleaggression #rape #femaleaggression
#MeToo #Me2017 #campusrape #spuriouscomplaint #falsereport
#fearofcrime #panic #sexpanic #rapeschedule #rapeculture #rumourspread
#WalkAgainstFamilyViolence #IDEVAW2107
#GirlsTakeOver #shetown #sheeconomy
#femalesupremacy #femaleaggression #genderpolitics #victimhood #professionalvictim #genderequality #genderbalance #genderdiversity #misandry #genderspecific approach to #crime #feminism #violencehasnogender
#frightbats #politicalcorrectness #criticaltheory #marxism #sacredcows #femalesupremacy #veiledthreat #sexpanic
#rapeculture #vindictiveprotectiveness #strangerdanger #safespace #triggerwarning #feminism #genderpolitics
#IWD #IWD2017
#femaleaggression #assault #violencebywomen #violenceagainstwomen
#melbourne #victoria #australia
#euthanasia
#genderequality #defamation #bullying #shameculture #reclaimthenightmelbourne, #socialexclusion, #emotionalviolence #clementineford
#familyviolence #domesticviolence #malevictims #genderspecific #rcfv #reclaimthenightmelbourne
#reclaimthenightmelbourne,
#reclaimthenight #genderspecific #genderequality #femaleaggression #victoriaagainstviolence #uniteandchange #16days #familyviolence #domesticviolence #emotionalviolence #rcfv #malevictims #socialexclusion #workplacebullying #bullyingatschool
#femaleaggression #bullying #genderequality #victoriaagainstviolence #uniteandchange #16days #familyviolence #domesticviolence #emotionalviolence #genderspecific #gender-equalapplicationofthelaw #streetharassment #ridicule #theglen #boxhillcentral #foresthillchase #westfieldknox #chirnsidepark #westfieldsouthland #dueprosess #safespaceguidelines #boardroomobsession #spin-sters #spinsisters #spindoctors #CommunityCorrectionsOrders, #VicPol, #CCO's, #suspendedsentence #fearofcrime #femaleaggression #genderequality #victoriaagainstviolence #uniteandchange #16days #deception, #manipulation, #spuriouscomplaints, #falsereports #emotionalviolence #familyviolence #domesticviolence #genderspecific #genderbias #assumptions #confirmationbias #covertbullying #cyberbullying #vigilantism #hypervigilantism victoriaagainstviolence, uniteandchange, 16days, #covertbullying #cyberbullying #genderspecific facebookneighbourhoodwatch, femaleaggression, vigilantism, JillMeagher, #woolworths #chemistwarehouse #adamrozenbachs publiclighting, sexualassault, #socialexclusion, stalkingsurveillance, parole, bail, #brokenjusticesystem #bullying #worksafe #workplacebullying #rumourspread #whisperingcampaigns #genderspecific #workplacebullying #bullyingatschool #rumourspread #nationalsecurity #revengeporn #slutshaming #misandry, #entrenchedprejudice, #privateinvestigators #ViolencebyWomengainstWomen
#publicsphereviolence #dueprocess #manbashing #potentialperpetrator #toxicfeminism #socialknowledge #woolworths #chemistwarehouse #mobbing
#ViolencebyWomenagainstWomen #publicsphereviolence #malesuicide
#stabbing #femaleaggression #neighbour #bondi #genderequality #violenceagainstmenbywomen
#culturalmarxism #misandry #politicallycorrectmisandry
#feministintimidation #bullying
#feminism #misandry #mansplain #manspread #genderspecific approach to #crime
#feministintimidation #bullying
#feminism #misandry #genderspecific approach to #crime
#feministintimidation #bullying
#murder #femaleaggression #familyviolence #domesticviolence
#feminism #misandry #genderspecific approach to #crime
#feministintimidation #bullying #fixatedwomen #fixatedfeminists
Post has attachment
Public
The Higher Organising Committee of the #InternationalExhibition for National Security & Resilience (ISNR Abu Dhabi 2018) confirmed that the upcoming 3 days event will explore the role of disruptive technologies in #nationalsecurity.
#ISNRAbuDhabi2018 #InternationalExhibition2018 #ISNRAbuDhabi_Event_2018
#ISNRAbuDhabi2018 #InternationalExhibition2018 #ISNRAbuDhabi_Event_2018
Add a comment...
Post has attachment
Public
03/10-11/2018 #Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Impressive, Strong, & Comprehensive Speech by President Donald J.Trump to Make America Proud Again. #KeepAmericaGreat It Is New Slogan Of The Century Will Our Guide to Following!!!!! #RickSaccone Is The Man Who Will Help to Do This!!! #Steel & #Aluminum Is The Keys To Open the Door to #FreeAndFairTrade!!! Tariffs Is Right For #AmericaFirst, #EconomySecurity Is The #NationalSecurity #Trump2020!!!!! You Tube! #Channel90TV!
Add a comment...
Post has attachment
Public
Add a comment...
Post has attachment
Public
I just released my latest episode on what the 2018 National Security Strategy is all about and what the actions in it could mean for Americans. Please listen and share if you're interested in understanding foreign policy issues from diverse perspectives. #NationalSecurity #ForeignPolicy
Wait while more posts are being loaded
![Community Safety Feminism Fear of Crime #GirlsTakeOver Reclaim the Night Melbourne's Flawed Purpose Feelings of Safety when walking alone after Dark Inadequate Public Street Lighting "The (feelings of) “safety on the streets after dark” question is a very common one in crime surveys, and indeed is sometimes the only one asked." Australian Institute of Criminology Research and Public Policy Series No. 51 2003 "We will not walk in fear of one another. We will not be driven by fear into an age of unreason if we dig deep in our history and our doctrine" Ed Murrow "Therefore organisations which promote women walking at night are promoting a high-fear-of-crime group to put itself in a high-fear-of-crime situation. Fine, they have every right to do so. But in this hyper-vigilant, high-fear era, we need to be clear on where the fear is coming from. And re vigilantism, we cannot scapegoat others for our pre-existing fear." Pete Dowe Bullying Cyberbullying Vigilantism Hypervigilantism Man-Bashing Social Exclusion “Social exclusion has been demonstrated to be the worst form of bullying [92]. In extreme forms it has been linked to suicide [206].” Edith Cowan University May, 2009 Social Contagion "The #genderpolitics of #fearofcrime The power to exclude #socialexclusion #gatekeeper ? or #doorbitch ?" Pete Dowe Mobbing "malicious, nonsexual, nonracial / racial, general harassment" Wikipedia "Mobbing: Feminazi-Stasi God's Secret Police" Pete Dowe "my bad word is my bond" female bully Fear disguised as Care "Better to Light a Candle Than to Curse the Darkness" #reclaimthenight #melbourne](http://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-A_X0nzoq4t4/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAL8/hdhFXqEQn0c/s110-p-k/photo.jpg)
