|
María Ángeles Esteban University of Murcia (Spain) |
16,215 |
|
Jafri Abdullah Universiti Sains Malaysia |
13,105 |
|
James Reimer University of the Ryukyus |
11,235 |
|
Robert Toonen University of Hawaii at Manoa |
9,875 |
|
Donald Kramer McGill University |
9,135 |
|
Paul Tulkens Université catholique e Louvain |
7,080 |
|
Vladimir Uversky University of South Florida |
6,600 |
|
Pedro Silva Universidade Fernando Pessoa |
6,570 |
|
Michael Wink Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg |
6,440 |
|
Dezene Huber University of Northern British Columbia |
6,305 |
|
Keith Crandall George Washington University |
6,235 |
|
Ann Hedrick University of California, Davis |
6,135 |
|
Kenneth De Baets Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg |
5,500 |
|
David Roberts University of Kent |
5,435 |
|
John Hutchinson The Royal Veterinary College |
5,400 |
Editors
PeerJ wouldn't be possible without the tremendous effort of its editorial board. Editors are awarded with 35 to 100 contribution points for each final decision made.
|
Robert Boessenecker University of Otago |
385 |
|
|
Zoe Johnson-Ulrich |
315 |
|
|
Márton Rabi |
315 |
|
Salvatore Andrea Mastrolia Ospedale dei Bambini "Vittore Buzzi" |
280 |
|
|
Eric Snively University of Wisconsin-La Crosse |
280 |
|
Spencer Lucas New Mexico Museum of Natural History |
280 |
|
C. Titus Brown University of California, Davis |
210 |
|
|
Kiran Liversage University of Tartu |
210 |
|
Aaron Darling University of Technology Sydney |
210 |
|
Y-h Taguchi |
210 |
|
|
Lin Naing |
210 |
|
Mike Thiv Natural History Museum Stuttgart |
210 |
|
|
Stephen Brusatte |
210 |
|
Manu Saunders University of New England |
210 |
|
|
Stephan Lautenschlager |
210 |
Open reviewers
No peer-reviewed journal could exist without its reviewers. This is often a major contribution within academia that goes unseen. At the same time we believe more transparency will improve how we do research.
To date ~80% of all PeerJ articles have published their reviews and >40% of referees choose to sign a named review. To further encourage named reviews, any open reviewer is awarded 35 contribution points.
|
Danilo Garcia Blekinge Center of Competence - Research, Development, and Innovation of Public Health |
2,495 |
|
|
John Hutchinson The Royal Veterinary College |
1,925 |
|
Antonio Palazón-Bru Miguel Hernández University |
1,890 |
|
|
Vicente Gil-Guillén |
1,755 |
|
|
Robert Toonen University of Hawaii at Manoa |
1,675 |
|
Daniel Nettle Newcastle University |
1,620 |
|
Justin Keogh Bond University |
1,585 |
|
|
Trevor Archer |
1,550 |
|
Jonathan Eisen University of California, Davis |
1,485 |
|
Kenneth Storey Carleton University |
1,450 |
|
John Measey Stellenbosch University |
1,380 |
|
Jan Jensen University of Copenhagen |
1,250 |
|
|
Swee Keong Yeap Xiamen University Malaysia |
1,210 |
|
|
Ali Al Nima |
1,180 |
|
|
Dave Goulson |
1,175 |
PeerJ authors
PeerJ is an open access peer-reviewed journal. We believe anyone choosing open access should be credited for that choice, which is why authors receive 100 points for every peer-reviewed publication. To encourage publishing of the peer-review history a further 35 points are awarded to authors making their review histories public.
|
Wenfa Ng |
4,270 |
|
|
Abram Hindle |
945 |
|
Vasco Elbrecht University of Guelph |
910 |
|
Thomas Backhaus University of Gothenburg |
840 |
|
|
Rodrick Wallace New York State Psychiatric Institute |
735 |
|
|
Kenneth Locey Indiana University at Bloomington |
700 |
|
|
Jay Lennon Indiana University |
665 |
|
Nabil Zary Nanyang Technological University |
630 |
|
Martin Daumer SLCMSR e.V. - The Human Motion Institute |
630 |
|
|
Angelo Facchiano |
630 |
|
|
Florian Leese |
595 |
|
Greg Jensen Columbia University |
560 |
|
J Gregory Caporaso Northern Arizona University |
525 |
|
|
Imadol Jeff-Eke Morehouse School of Medicine |
525 |
|
Grace Gachanja Walden University |
490 |
Preprint authors
Preliminary knowledge shouldn't have to wait, that's why PeerJ started publishing preprints in addition to the formal peer-reviewed articles.
Authors choosing to publish preprints are doing all of us a favor that should be credited. Of course the preprint itself has a DOI and will be the major credit, but in addition PeerJ also awards 35 points for each preprint.
|
Vahe Demirjian |
350 |
|
|
Ivan Marchesini |
305 |
|
Ross Mounce University of Cambridge |
130 |
|
Andrew Farke Raymond M. Alf Museum of Paleontology |
75 |
|
|
Pedro Silva Universidade Fernando Pessoa |
65 |
|
|
Tim Williams |
60 |
|
|
Mickey Mortimer |
55 |
|
Roberto Maffei ARPA-Firenze - Cultural association |
55 |
|
|
Olivier Ertz |
55 |
|
|
Philip Young |
45 |
|
Stephane Joost Laboratory of Geographic Information Systems, EPFL |
45 |
|
Brad McFeeters |
40 |
|
Iain Reid Rutland Senior Secondary School |
40 |
|
Jim Kirkland Utah Geological Survey |
40 |
|
|
Lars Gamfeldt University of Gothenburg, Sweden |
40 |
Feedback on Preprints
Similar to peer-review, informal feedback usually goes unnoticed to the wider world. We'd like to credit anyone giving valuable feedback on any published preprint. Preprint authors can choose to accept valuable feedback and anyone can upvote valuable feedback. When that happens contribution points are awarded to the feedback contributor.
|
Heather Piwowar |
135 |
|
PeerJ Staff |
125 |
|
Sarah Werning Stony Brook University |
115 |
|
|
Andrew Farke Raymond M. Alf Museum of Paleontology |
95 |
|
Pamela Ronald The University of California, Davis |
95 |
|
|
Greg Jensen Columbia University |
70 |
|
Jonathan Tennant Imperial College London |
50 |
|
Edmund Hart National Ecological Observatory Network |
45 |
|
Corina Logan Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology |
42 |
|
|
Aaron McLean Queen Mary University of London |
40 |
|
Stephen Macknik SUNY Downstate Medical Center |
35 |
|
Christopher Lortie YorkU |
34 |
|
Pete Binfield PeerJ |
31 |
|
Daniel McGlinn College of Charleston |
30 |
|
Leonardo Saravia Universidad Nacional de General Sarmiento |
30 |
Answered questions
Like informal feedback, answers to questions usually go unrewarded. StackOverflow established a new standard for giving credit to programmers with knowledge and to those seeking it. We very much borrowed from that concept to build out PeerJ's Q&A annotation system.
Anyone answering a question can receive credit, you don't need to be an author to ask or answer questions.
|
|
Christopher Lortie YorkU |
45 |
|
|
Lindsey Nelson |
25 |
|
Nieky van Veggel Writtle University College |
15 |
|
Jason Hoyt PeerJ |
15 |
|
|
Pete Binfield PeerJ |
10 |
|
Antoine Taly CNRS |
5 |
|
|
Ravindra Gavali |
5 |
|
Robert Gay Colorado Canyons Association |
5 |
|
Hadi Bayat |
5 |
|
|
Olaf Blaauw NA |
5 |
|
|
Nuno Ferreira |
5 |
|
|
Joshua Plotnik |
5 |
|
Charles Warden City of Hope |
5 |
|
Sophie Kusy PeerJ |
5 |
|
|
Paul Blair |
5 |
Asked questions
Questions are part of our annotation system. Often comments are actually structured as questions with an expectation that someone, not just an author, may have the answer.
Questions can be asked at the paragraph level on any peer-reviewed article, on any preprint, or standalone from any specific publication. These questions can then be searched as structured knowledge. PeerJ is looking to use emerging annotation standards to enable better reuse in the knowledge graph across the Web.