WordPress.org

Make WordPress Community

Welcome to the official blog of the community/outreach team for the WordPress open source project!

This team oversees official events, mentorship programs, diversity initiatives, contributor outreach, and other ways of growing our community.

If you love WordPress and want to help us do these things, join in!

Getting Involved

We use this blog for status reports, project announcements, and the occasional policy debate. Everyone is welcome and encouraged to comment on posts and join the discussion.

You can learn about our current activities on the Team Projects page. There projects are suitable for everyone from newcomers to WordPress community elders.

You can use our contact form to volunteer for one of our projects.

Communication

In addition to discussions on this blog, we have Office Hours four times a week in the #community-events channel on Slack for real-time communication. Office hours for the next week are scheduled for Monday 22:00 UTC 2016, Tuesday 13:00 UTC 2016, Wednesday 22:00 UTC 2016, and Thursday 13:00 UTC 2016 in the #community-events channel on Slack.

Recent Updates Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • Jon (Kenshino) 6:09 am on November 3, 2016 Permalink |  
    Categories: Community Management ( 187 )

    Community Team should take ownership / look at WordCamp Meta tickets 

    Proposal:

    So interestingly, due to https://make.wordpress.org/community/feature-requests-for-community-sites/ – one must create a P2 post and also a Meta Trac ticket for any ideas to go through. (Incidentally, not everyone in the Community Team knows this).

    This makes little sense in the grand scheme of things. In many of the tickets that I posted in the proposal post, the changes are pretty obvious and is unlikely to need any form of a debate. It just requires code changes.

    In my opinion, only larger or controversial changes should require a P2 discussion. While I agree that the community team should take ownership of decision on it’s own systems, the way to do so is to actually discuss meta tickets that are worthy by having a Community Team member, take charge of these tickets and bring it out for discussion in the Community Team meetings.

    Every other team does their bug scrub in a similar fashion and it is what WordPress developers like me are used to. This 2 step approach isn’t helpful (at least not for small issues)

    My suggestion is moving forward – we should keep entry barriers as low as possible. Anyone can create a meta trac ticket, but not everyone can post to Make / Community.

    • Non-developers who simply want to word their request / suggestion in P2 should continue to do so
      • After approval, a technically inclined person (if needed) can post onto Meta Trac
    • Developers who are used to trac should just create a ticket in trac
      • This ticket can ideally be discussed and raised by the ticket creator in Community Team meetings
      • Or, the Community Team can have a few people, possibly Ian – bring up some of these tickets for discussion. Afterall he looks through them.

    https://wordpress.slack.com/archives/community-team/p1476945622000888 for some background

    Cheers!

     
  • Jon (Kenshino) 6:03 am on November 3, 2016 Permalink |
    Tags:   

    Proposal: Various changes to WordCamp site and plugins 

    Proposal 1: Sponsor Info to have billing and contact emails

    Reasoning:

    So I received a unique case whereby the sponsor has a specific contact address and another billing address for emails.

    Unfortunately, we could only put one email, so I’m keeping track of the contact email out of the system. This is because the billing email is more relevant in the system for invoicing.

    I think the system should be used for both archival, contact and billing purposes.

    Ticket: https://meta.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/1794

    Proposal 2: Invoice Meta Box needs text and visual change to make it more intuitive

    Reasoning:

    The ‘Edit Existing Invoices’ is a misnomer since you can’t actually edit submitted invoices. It’d be more like ‘See Existing Invoices’, or just ‘Existing Invoices’

    I don’t think we need a ‘Add New Invoice’ title to a button that says ‘Add New Invoice’

    Visual hierarchy as well – the 2 ‘section titles’ should not be bigger than the meta box title.

    See https://cloudup.com/c2J7xkYnqjx

    Ticket: https://meta.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/1831

    Proposal 3: Allow sponsor shortcode to have additional attribute to let us decide to show content or excerpt or image or some variations of those.

    Reasoning:

    Right now the sponsor shortcode shows the_content and the title itself is not linked (check https://2016.singapore.wordcamp.org/sponsors/, you’ll have to inspect to see the hidden title output)

    The problem with this is that some sponsors are gonna have huge chunks of text and some aren’t. So it’s gonna look unequal, plus no one reads through that amount of text.

    An excerpt will give us a good control of what to display on the archive page for sponsors. And the single page will allow people who actually want to read about them – to … well do so.

    I propose that the shortcode should do the following

    Allow excerpt=$length (length being a character limit that possibly hooks into excerpt_length filter, and when this is on, the_content is not ran)
    Allow both excerpts and content to be hidden to only show the sponsor image.

    Some discussion on Slack between Ian, me and Andrea – https://wordpress.slack.com/archives/events/p1465198114000016

    Ticket: https://meta.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/1751

    Proposal 4: Add Notes Field to Invoice

    Reasoning:

    I think it would be nice if we are able to add some notes to the invoice before sending.

    Eg. If my sponsorship amount was $500 and the sponsor wants to add $20 to cover the PayPal fees, I should be able to document that decision and that price in the invoice itself.

    Or else it’ll be lost to emails and whoever is working Quickbooks would have to ask anyway.

    See @miss_jwo and my chat on slack for background – https://wordpress.slack.com/archives/events/p1467958380001372

    Ticket: https://meta.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/1817

    Proposal 5: Order Talk Abstract according to time

    Reasoning:

    See https://2016.singapore.wordcamp.org/schedule/ as an example.

    The abstract of the talks all listed belong and linked by the anchor tag are ordered via the date/time they were submitted.

    Instead it should be ordered via the date/time they are scheduled.

    Or else scrolling through that list makes it look like a random collection.

    Ticket: https://meta.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/1896

    Proposal 6: Add ability to mark tickets as invalid / revoked

    Reasoning:

    Currently, it is impossible to remove tickets that have been erroneously created. For example for WordCamp NL a volunteer ordered two tickets by accident. The organisation has no way to revoke this ticket.

    Feature request by @tacoverdo.

    Ticket: https://meta.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/2141#comment:1

     
  • Andrea Middleton 11:35 pm on November 1, 2016 Permalink |
    Tags:   

    Categories: Community Management ( 187 )

    Sponsorship and Finances Report for October 2016 

    Here’s that weekly monthly update on the payments and income for WordPress community events that we now post monthly. (You’d be amazed at how much more efficient it is to do this report on a monthly basis.) This report might get more elaborate as we get the time to build more tools around financial reporting (currently it’s quite, very, extremely manual), so if there’s a level of detail we’re not providing that you’d like to see, please mention it in the comments!

    In the month of October, here’s what came in:

    Ticket revenue via PayPal: $95,801.71 USD (2,655 total tickets )
    Sponsorship income via wire transfer: $148,326.19 USD
    Sponsorship income via check: $12,016.00 USD
    Sponsorship income via PayPal: $54,746.76 USD

    Total revenue (in USD): $310,890.66

    As for invoicing in this period:

    We sent 73 invoices to local sponsors.
    Of those, 51 invoices have been paid, and 22 invoices are still outstanding.

    And in this same period, here’s what went out:

    Total number of vendor payments/reimbursements: 171

    Total payments (in USD): $245,931.30

    Global Sponsorship Grants that were set in this period:

    Bilbao 2,800 EUR
    Sao Paulo 9500R$
    Miami 20,000 USD
    Manila 49,000 PHP
    Mumbai 400,000 INR
    Nairobi 800,800 KES

    As always, if you have any questions, please ask away in the comments!

     
  • Andrea Middleton 9:32 pm on October 31, 2016 Permalink |  
    Categories: Community Management ( 187 ), WordCamps ( 154 )

    Regional WordCamps 

    There’s been discussion in our community lately about expanding the number of regional WordCamps in the community program. In this post, I’d like to give some historical context about how the program came to include regional events, and then discuss how regional WordCamps fit into the goals of the community team’s programs. Finally, I’d like to gather opinions and thoughts about what kind of criteria we should set to decide on how to add regional WordCamps to the program.

    A little history

    First came WordCamp SF, which was the first WordCamp ever and became to be the official annual conference of the WordPress open source project. Over the years, WordCamp SF grew as WordPress itself grew (quickly).

    Then we tried a new event concept: WordCamp Europe, a large regional event that brings together WordPress community members in Europe to share knowledge and create closer community ties. When discussing WordCamp Europe with the first organizers in 2012, we set very specific goals:

    • to organize an event that exemplified the values of the WordPress project and the WordCamp program
    • to encourage the growth of local communities in Europe (to prompt more WordCamps, not less)

    In 2014, WordCamp SF finally grew out of its historic home in the (edit) Moscone Center Mission Bay and became WordCamp US. Unlike the WordCamp Europe tradition of moving to a new city every year, WordCamp US currently moves to a new city every 2 years. WordCamp US is also the event that hosts Matt’s annual State of the Word address.

    The success of these two events begs the question: why don’t we organize more regionally-based WordCamps?

    Community team program goals: ALL OF THE CAMPS!

    One goal for the WordPress Community program is to have a WordPress meetup and annual WordCamp in as many cities as possible in the world. So while regional or national events have a purpose, they should never be a replacement for our focus on supporting the growth and health of local communities.

    Regional events are big events, and big events are challenging. A lot of program resources (volunteer time especially) go into organizing both WordCamp Europe and WordCamp US. So as we start thinking about adding more regional events to the program, the question of “how is our volunteer time best spent” is important. For example, if we had to choose between organizing 3 more WordCamps in CountryX, or organizing just one WordCamp CountryX, then we’d always go with 3 more WordCamps in CountryX — because that directly helps us meet our goal of “a WordCamp in every possible city.”

    Of course, just as WordCamps don’t replace year-round monthly meetup events — but instead hopefully help the local monthly meetup community grow — regional WordCamps can also help our program grow by attracting people who weren’t already active in their community and/or inspiring attendees to start communities in their hometowns.

    Community team program goals: ALL OF THE PEOPLE!

    Another goal in the WordPress Community program (which dovetails nicely with our goal of having a community in as many cities in the world as possible) is to make WordPress community accessible to as many people as possible, regardless of their financial status or other factors that might limit travel.

    Having several WordCamps in a certain country every year makes WordCamp more available to more people, even if those folks are not able to travel. So more WordCamps gets more good quality content to more people, which is another good reason not to allow regional WordCamps (even one that travels from city to city every year) to replace an active local WordCamp scene.

    The Question

    What should a region have, to make a regional WordCamp possible and beneficial to the overall community? Here’s my first stab at a set of expectations:

    1. Multiple, active local WordPress communities: Regional WordCamps need a lot of local, experiences volunteers wherever the event is hosted. If there aren’t already more than 3-5 local communities in a region that have experience hosting WordCamps (at least one but preferably two in a row), then a regional event won’t be able to move around and share the work of organizing a big regional event.
    2. Multiple, experienced and available regional organizers: A regional WordCamp organizing team should represent and reflect all of the local communities in the region it represents. I’ve previously mentioned that regional camps should not be organized at the expense of multiple WordCamps being held in the region, so that means if a regional camp is going to happen, it should not be robbing local camps of all their prospective organizers.
    3. Further the goals of the community program: As with any event in our program, regional WordCamps should help the program pursue our goal of having more, better local communities and more, better local WordCamps.

    What do you think about the idea of having more regional WordCamps, considering our community team goals? How about those suggested expectations? Please share your thoughts in the comments!

     
    • Noel Tock 10:03 pm on October 31, 2016 Permalink | Log in to Reply

      I’m a big fan of this. WordCamp Europe is a great example obviously, having become the largest WordCamp in the world. It’s become instrumental in creating new relationships and experiences across different cultures and languages, especially where so many countries are packed together in such a small space.

      Speaking for myself, I’m starting to feel that a lot of local WordCamps are putting in plenty of effort for what turns out to be a 100-150 person event. This isn’t to take anything away from the events themselves, but rather to question if local meetups could carry more of the hyperlocal weight, whilst the bigger efforts are consolidated on a regional level. WordCamp Nordics (Norway, Sweden, Finland, Denmark) or WordCamp for German speakers (Germany, Austria, Switzerland, Luxembourg) automatically come to mind. The dream of course, is WordCamp Asia.

      I think the questions put forward also make sense at first glance. There’s enough experience between WCEU & WCUS now to help provide some support for larger scale events and the different organisational challenges that accompany it.

      100% behind more regional/continental WordCamps.

      • Andrea Middleton 10:48 pm on October 31, 2016 Permalink | Log in to Reply

        a lot of local WordCamps are putting in plenty of effort for what turns out to be a 100-150 person event

        Can you elaborate more on this? Are you seeing a problem with the amount of work organizing teams are putting into WordCamps, and if so, do you have any thoughts about what might be causing the problem? 🙂

        • Noel Tock 12:32 pm on November 1, 2016 Permalink | Log in to Reply

          Sure. This year we were forced to break up WordCamp Switzerland to base it on city levels. Instead of having a single org team and a WordCamp of 300-400 people, we may now have smaller fragmented ones (not sure how many tickets WordCamp Geneva has sold, guessing < 100). There also won't be a Zurich one as the goal was to rotate the "WordCamp Switzerland" concept, and the majority of the previous team isn't interested in doing a "WordCamp Zurich" next year.

          I don't want to argue the rule, but it artificially imposes additional work and creates smaller WordCamps (it's even worse for Croatia, they're half the population of Switzerland). It just feels as if hyperlocal WordCamps are slowly losing "bang for buck" (plenty of organisational effort for not much attendance). Hence I (personally) prefer contributing to larger ones and like the concept of additional regional/continental.

          Thanks for reading.

          • Andrea Middleton 3:57 am on November 2, 2016 Permalink | Log in to Reply

            Just to clarify, the additional/regional WordCamp would come *after* there were enough local communities that were well-established enough within the region to support a regional event with local organizers and volunteers. So regional events, if we move ahead with the idea of expanding that concept past WordCamp US and WordCamp Europe, would be *in addition to* multiple city-based WordCamps, not a replacement for them. 🙂

            • Noel Tock 1:53 pm on November 2, 2016 Permalink

              Thanks, I understand that and think it’s unfortunate. Taking the country level away took us 2 steps back (at least for Switzerland), which means we need to make 4 steps forward again for this new regional classification. These hard rules/guidelines/classifications of WordCamps is taking something rather simple and making it a lot more complex imho.

    • Jon Brown 10:25 pm on October 31, 2016 Permalink | Log in to Reply

      Hugely support more regional WordCamps and agree with pretty much everything above including what Noel added and a big +1 WCAsia.

      A couple thoughts that aren’t above:

      • I think these major camps should be _regional_, not _national_. US should adopt that and change to North America and roam from Mexico to Canada, at least until some day when there is actually a regional camp to serve Canada and/or Mexico and maybe even some day Western US and Eastern US as well. A bit more radically said: the WordPress community shouldn’t divide itself up upon geo-political boundaries by default.
      • I think the regional camps should take on a professional level conference stance, embracing that they are for professionals rather than amateurs (Both pro/am include developers, users and others in my semantics).
      • I would hope that in doing so annual camps would +shrink in attendance_ and refocus more on amateurs and hobbyists (again, including both developers and users in those groups). Many of the annual camps have gotten ridiculously large and try to out do themselves or each other every year. In doing so they become less and less accessible to new people. In this I also support “specialized” local camps like those for developers, teachers, etc…

      Finally, I in light of what I said above above downsizing local camps I want to be clear I still full support those camps having lots of out of the area speakers. It’s extremely valuable to have out of area speakers at even the smallest most local of camps.

      • Andrea Middleton 10:45 pm on October 31, 2016 Permalink | Log in to Reply

        I think the regional camps should take on a professional level conference stance, embracing that they are for professionals rather than amateurs

        Do you think this approach is at odds with the self-definition of WordCamps as casual, volunteer-organized conferences? Absolutely not saying our volunteers don’t conduct themselves professionally, but how do you envision the casual, inclusive “feel” of a WordCamp playing itself out in an event designed for professionals rather than amateurs?

        I want to be clear I still full support those camps having lots of out of the area speakers

        Sorry, I’m confused. Are you saying you disagree with the goal we set for organizers to have 80% local speakers and 20% out of town speakers? 🙂

        • Jon Brown 12:36 am on November 1, 2016 Permalink | Log in to Reply

          I think city WordCamps have become _less casual_ over the years and I’d like to see them return to being more like they were 10 years ago. Disclaimer: I frequent some pretty big city WordCamps so my perception is a little skewed. That said however, I have gone to more WordCamps than most and I’ve been trying to get to a wider variety of camps lately.

          My hope is that in having regional WordCamps be more focused on professionals that would in turn free/encourage city WordCamps to return to being more casual and grassroots like they used to be. That might just be a pipe dream at this point but it’s a dream I have.

          Heck I’d rather see big camps split into 2 annual camps with different focuses. I’ve heard mixed things about the cities that have recently tried that though… Not sure I’m ready to give up on that dream though.

          More to the point of Regional WordCamps, my take is they should embrace having a professional audience and include most professional conferences do, have things like networking events (not after parties), having a mobile app/schedule for the event, having specific well tailored break out sessions and well designed content tracks.

          “`
          Sorry, I’m confused. Are you saying you disagree with the goal we set for organizers to have 80% local speakers and 20% out of town speakers?
          “`

          Correct. I’ve always disagreed with the 80/20 local/out-of-town goal for speakers and have been pretty vocal about it over the years. I think that speakers traveling between cities/regions for WordCamps is a great way to spread knowledge and inspire attendees. I’m not against local speakers, just I don’t see it as a good thing favor poor local speakers over great speakers willing to travel. I just wanted to be clear that my saying “City WordCamps should get more grassroots and local” doesn’t mean I think there speaker split should be 80/20, I still think 50/50 would be better.

        • Ibon Azkoitia 8:33 am on November 1, 2016 Permalink | Log in to Reply

          The major problem of the 80/20 is that sometimes there is not enough local people that wants to speak in a WordCamp. People have a lot of respect for doing it and it makes difficult to find candidates in town.

          Another thing is to give the option to the local community to learn and hear great speakers that can come and share their knowledge. We have the local Meetups where local people can share knowledge and local community benefit.

          And of course, we can do things to have a great balance between local and out of town speakers. In our first WordCamp Bilbao we made a third track (one television, a desk and 15-20 chairs) where local people could speak and teach without the pressure of been in front of 90 people.

          We had:

          • 13 local (we still had 5 spaces in Track C for more local speakers)
          • 9 from Spain Community speakers
          • 3 international speakers

          I think 50/50 it’s a great balance, or at least not to “force” to have 80/20 because sometimes it’s impossible.

          • Andrea Middleton 1:08 pm on November 1, 2016 Permalink | Log in to Reply

            I vote we hold a discussion of the 80/20 speakers goal for another time, since this is thread is about something else, but thanks to the both of you for sharing your thoughts. 🙂

    • Ibon Azkoitia 8:14 am on November 1, 2016 Permalink | Log in to Reply

      During this year we have been discussing this in the Spanish Community. And I think this is the right moment to share it.

      We are thinking of making a “rotatory” Big WordCamp in Spain using the local WordCamps. The thing is that all the available WordCamp organizers in Spain could help that WordCamp to make it bigger. This is the approach of the WCEU, there is a WordCamp in Europe that one year is the WCEU with the help of other organizers.

      We may have 8 WordCamps in Spain in 2017, so, for example, all the organizers could help WordCamp Barcelona 2017 to make it bigger and more prepared for giving value to the community. The name would remain and NOT be called WordCamp Spain.

      Of course that a WordCamp it’s focused for local community, but local it’s also the Spanish Community. Not everyone can go to the WCEU. This way they would have a major WordCamp in Spain once a year and the rest WordCamps would remain as always.

    • Trisha Cornelius 9:08 am on November 1, 2016 Permalink | Log in to Reply

      I think that regional WordCamps can be a great way to springboard local WordCamp organization. One of the challenges that WordCamp Johannesburg is facing is the fact that only a small percentage of the organizers have been to a WordCamp and hence have an understanding of what is expected.What we have found is by talking to organizers of other WordCamps, specifically the lovely folks from WordCamp Cape Town have been really helpful but actually working together I think would vastly improve the mentoring process.

    • Ulrich 9:41 am on November 1, 2016 Permalink | Log in to Reply

      Not all city have a large population. The largest city in Switzerland, Zürich has a population of just 375 thousand. The train journey from Bern the capital to Zürich takes one hour. New York has a population of 8 million. It take more than an hour to travel from side to the other. The state of New York is larger than Switzerland.

      Not all regions are the same. Not cities are all of the same. It would be better to have the guideline based on poplulation and travel time instead of political boundaries.

      From an organisational point of view it would be easier to organise one larger WordCamp with over 200 attendees then organise three WordCamps with 75 attendees.

      Meetups should be local but WordCamps should be able to place where we meet people we would normally not meet at the meetups. As it is an annual event, people are more prepared to invest more.

    • Petya Raykovska 4:42 pm on November 1, 2016 Permalink | Log in to Reply

      WordCamp Europe helped a lot of local communities get started mostly by inspiring already enthusiastic people to go a step further and start organising meetups and events. Switzerland, Serbia, Croatia, Slovenia, Lithuania, Latvia, Greece, Italy (!) – many of these communities started in Leiden, Sofia and Seville because their representatives chatted to people who were already organising events in other countries.

      Completely agree there need to be several strong communities in a region for a regional WordCamp to make sense. WordCamp Europe moves from country to country every year for a reason and it keeps growing for the same reason – WordPress people from around the world love meeting each other in different contexts, they are curious, they want to explore a new community and make new connections. But for a regional WordCamp to move from country to country, there need to be several countries with experienced organisers ready to take on the task. Europe has much more than Asia, so I would say that Asia needs to push for more and stronger local communities before having a WordCamp.

      What we’re seeing in Asia that’s amazing, is how people from countries that already have established communities are willing to step up and offer mentorship and guidance for smaller developing communities so they could build a good base for a future regional WordCamp. The idea of WordCamp Asia is already helping the development of new communities around the continent before the event even happened. Isn’t that amazing?

      In terms of how a regional WordCamp affects a local WordCamp: As an organiser of a local WordCamp (Sofia) and a member of a community that has also hosted WordCamp Europe, I can say that hosting a Regional WordCamp is extremely beneficial for both the local community and all neighbouring communities.

      WordCamp Sofia has continued to grow after 2014, adding 20% more attendees each year, expanding the local team and volunteers and helping community members around the country start their own meetups and hopefully WordCamps (soon).

      The experience of organising a regional WordCamp enables local organisers to serve as mentors for not just their own city WordCamp, but on a country, and sometimes on a regional level as well. Shared resources, visiting speakers, local sponsors support – that all can be done remotely of course, but it works so much better when people have met in person.

    • Josh Pollock 3:46 am on November 2, 2016 Permalink | Log in to Reply

      I go to a lot of WordCamps. 10 or so a year.

      I think that having low price events on weekends is important. It gives new users an opportunity to learn a lot fast and see what the community is. I wouldn’t be where I am without having gone to a few camps when. I got started and learned as much as I could by going to as many camps as I could.

      But I also don’t think that these events are serving the needs of people who make up the community as well as they could. Obviously I’m going to all these camps to network and market my product as much as I am to contribute by speaking. I’m also going to see friends and that’s an important role of WordCamps as well.

      So, I love the idea of the regional WordCamp as a way to focus less on what existing WordCamps do well and more on the needs of professionals in our community. I see that as higher level business and development training. Less talks, more structured networking and collaboration time. Also, more focus on community and core projects.

      Also, what if regional camps where niche focused? Plugin development, SEO, blogging, etc. Or what if we had a WordCamp to spend three days making a big new feature for core?

    • Aditya Kane 11:30 am on November 2, 2016 Permalink | Log in to Reply

      WordCamp Asia is a nice idea, but Asia is not as easy as Europe in terms or travel and visa accessibility. Also some cities that would be ideal do not have much or no local community.

      So its good there are people in Asia pushing for an event and helping local communities grow, I think right now a lot of them are just starting, will be interesting to see how many flourish locally with new organisers and members coming in.

      I would probably support the idea of a WordCamp India in say 3-4 years. With 6-7 WordCamps possibly being 3-4 years old by then it would be a great time to have a large pan-India WordCamp.

      As you mentioned the two priorities are

      • to organize an event that exemplified the values of the WordPress project and the WordCamp program
      • to encourage the growth of local communities (to prompt more WordCamps, not less)

      The second point is interesting. In the sense, the more people think of larger and more professional WordCamp events the less likely (just my opinion) they would work towards a healthy expanding local community. That is because they would have only that much time to give for free.

    • ivanblagdan 10:09 pm on November 2, 2016 Permalink | Log in to Reply

      Having taken part in organizing what started as WordCamp Croatia and ended up being WordCamp Split, I’d like to share a couple of thoughts.

      I think every region is different and this needs to be taken into account. I don’t think its possible to create a blanket rule or a scheme for WordCamps because each one is specific to the people that take part in it. The general attitude that should be asumed is that the local community organizers are domain experts in their local communities. To that end, WordCamp Central should be attuned to whats happening in each case individually and pursue the scale of WordCamps that make sense for that area.

      We have our Croatian community organized on a national level, with plenty of cities connecting on that level. We all have our separate meetups and share speakers and whatnot. Once a year, we hold a WordCamp in one of those cities, pooling all the resources and knowhow together to create a more meaningful gathering thats has broader appeal. This allows us to get more speakers and sponsors to create more meaningful content. This allows us to show a glimpse of the more global community that gathered around WordPress and maybe inspire some more people to take a more active role.

      We might have had our WordCamp named after a city its being held at, starting this year, but its being organized on a national level.
      We so far had two WordCamps done like this, in different cities, and they have been a great success, especially in getting people to get out of their rooms and meet their other peers. If we were aiming at having local meetups + a WordCamp in each city, I’m pretty sure there would be far less regularity and no continuity.

      There shouldn’t be a need to impose any particular structure here, communities tend to grow or fragment naturally based on demand and maybe sometimes this requires some intervention. I think the less specific the rules on this are, the more diverese the WordCamps will be. Why not WordCamp Balkans, a Ex-Yu WordCamp or WordCamp Croatia? If people feel like its needed it will happen at the scale its supposed to.

      In my opinion, communities in smaller cities, can have normal meetups, without the overhead of budgeting and organizing a WordCamp. It keeps things simple and easier to run continually. WordCamps on the other hand, should be special. I can see a case where either too many or to few WordCamps is equally bad longterm.

      If WordCamp Europe is becoming a 4000 person event, where its fairly difficult to meet anyone, and other WordCamps are aimed at the city microcommunities, which is mostly the same people all the time – there needs to be something in between. In our case a national level event is the perfect size.

      Sorry for the long read, its a very broad topic 😉

  • Andrea Middleton 7:57 pm on October 31, 2016 Permalink |  

    Proposed 2017 Global Sponsorship Program 

    Below you’ll find my proposed 2017 Global Sponsorship Program.

    tl;dr: We’re raising sponsorship rates only about 15% even though we saw around 28% growth in the number of WordCamps and more than 80% growth in the number of meetup groups on the chapter account.

    Two suggested new benefits: First, to include a “global community sponsor” visual call-out on global sponsor logos as they appear on WordCamp sites. If a global sponsor also sponsors WordCamp US or WordCamp EU (they are still excluded from the program and thus companies must sponsor them separately), the acknowledgement on the WCUS/WCEU site will include the “global sponsor” visual call-out.

    Second suggested new benefit: Sponsors can “upgrade” to a higher local level to 10 camps per year — a Bronze global sponsor may pay the difference between the local WordCamp sponsorship levels to be able to acknowledged as a Gold sponsor (if spaces are available), up to 6 weeks before the WordCamp is held.

    Also, Gold-level global sponsors that confirm their commitment (by signing the contract; billing will go out on Jan 1) by November 30 will be guaranteed table space for Q1 2017 WordCamps. Global sponsors (Gold level) that confirm after November 30 might not have table space reserved for them at Q1 2017 WordCamps.

    A long, detailed post awaits your patient attention; post your suggestions or questions in the comments below! 🙂

    WordPress Global Community Sponsorship in 2017

    (More …)

     
  • Andrea Middleton 3:25 pm on October 31, 2016 Permalink |  
    Categories: Community Management ( 187 )

    Reminder: Community Team Chat is this Thursday 

    Just a reminder that our monthly Community Team Chat will be held this Thursday, November 3 at 19:00 UTC in the #outreach channel of WordPress.org Slack. Mark your calendars, and if there’s something you want to discuss in the chat, mention it in the comments here! 🙂

     
  • Pascal Casier 12:59 pm on October 31, 2016 Permalink |
    Tags: ,   

    How about centralized weekly updates ? 

    With the polyglots we have resumed the weekly update on https://make.wordpress.org/updates/ . I would be great if other teams are willing to add a weekly (or at least regular) update there too. It should be short, but indicate what the teams are busy with. About 5-6 teams are already on it, join us to get a kind of central repository of all what is going on around here on WordPress.

    Pascal.

     
  • WordCamp.org 4:00 am on October 31, 2016 Permalink |  

    Hello to all our Deputies, WordCamp organizers, Meetup wranglers, and WordPress Community builders! You were probably hard at work this weekend. Tell us what you got accomplished in our #weekly-update!

    Have you run into a roadblock with the stuff you’re working on? Head over to #community-events or #community-team in Slack and ask for help!

     
  • Bernhard Kau 10:08 am on October 25, 2016 Permalink |  
    Categories: WordCamps ( 154 )

    Feature Request: Add a custom taxonomy for teams to the WordCamp organizers post type 

    The organizing team for larger WordCamps such as Europe and U.S. have been getting bigger every year. We would like to be able to structure the page showing the organizers better. Having the ability to categorize those organizers into teams and then print them separately using a new attribute on the [organizers] shortcode would help a lot with this.

    I’ve already created a ticket with a patch to add this new custom taxonomy, but was asked to propose this feature request here, so the community team can discuss about this idea. So I would kindly invite you to share your thoughts on this idea.

     
  • Carl Alberto 8:06 pm on October 24, 2016 Permalink |  
    Categories: WordCamps ( 154 )

    2 WordCamp site features that might help new organizers 

    Hello Community Team!

    As we prepare for our upcoming WordCamp in Manila, we encountered 2 challenges along the way, hopefully our feedback can help new organizers:

    1. Theme developer roles

    We assigned a volunteer developer/designer which is not part of the organizing team to modify the theme in our WordCamp site. The only way for us to do that is assign them an Admin role, which will also give them full access to the site. We then realized that it might be a security risk later on if that accessed is abused. We changed their role to Editor access but limits them to only edit post and pages. We tried utilizing the remote css tool and hosted the css file in a public repo, it was a great help, but still they need Administrator role help from time to time in changing background and logo images in the theme’s customizer.

    Would it be helpful if there is custom user role for a “theme developer” between an Editor and Administrator which has capabilities on edit_theme_options and update_themes? In that way, organizers are confident that the theme developer can have full control in the aesthetics of the site without any worries.

    2. Simple Mailer from the WordCamp site

    It has been pointed out to me that it has been a long ongoing issue where WordCamp organizers should be given access to outgoing mails using [email protected]. From our perspective,  as first time event organizers, as well as from our country where WordCamp is just emerging, most key person that we approach for sponsorship and venue request asked us for an official letter of request. This ends us up without any reply when using our own personal email. It took us 3 months to secure a venue after actively attending tech events.

    Would it be a good idea to have a simple emailing plugin directly from the WC site that can utilize wp_mail? An input box for recipient, subject and message would be sufficient enough for us to send a formal request letter using an email coming from the wordcamp.org

     

    Would you also think improving these 2 areas can greatly help out lessening the load for new WordCamp organizers? Thank you for giving me a chance to suggest ideas!

     
    • thabotswana 8:13 pm on October 24, 2016 Permalink | Log in to Reply

      I do agree with you, Carl, about our official email address. I was wondering if there was a way to use our [email protected] address to send emails. It does look more professional and carries more weight, especially when approaching potential sponsors.

    • Wes Linda 11:22 pm on October 24, 2016 Permalink | Log in to Reply

      Both points are valid. On the email front, we’ve setup a GMail account to send for our Camp but it might not be a bad idea to be able to send from the city@ address.

      On the email front, I’d love to see some sort of general “list” become available. I’d love to bring all of the past attendees forward into a single list each year so we can send out announcements and not have to log into a past year to blast out to past attendees.

      I know we can export the data and pull into Mailchimp or something but I believe that’s frowned upon. An enhanced email / subscription option for past attendees would be awesome.

    • Rocio Valdivia 11:55 am on October 25, 2016 Permalink | Log in to Reply

      Hi Carl and all WC organizers! You’ve already can send emails from your email address [email protected] since May this year. Here are the quick instructions and reference 🙂
      https://make.wordpress.org/community/2016/04/07/wordcamps-working-with-email/#comment-22131

    • Andrea Middleton 10:29 pm on October 26, 2016 Permalink | Log in to Reply

      Would it be helpful if there is custom user role for a “theme developer” between an Editor and Administrator which has capabilities on edit_theme_options and update_themes? In that way, organizers are confident that the theme developer can have full control in the aesthetics of the site without any worries.

      Since wordcamp.org is so security-conscious anyway, the number of things one can do when customizing a theme on a WordCamp site is already pretty limited to custom CSS (which is sanitized). If someone is worried about a volunteer who’s been invited to help design the event site doing something bad, I would just setup Remote CSS, since that wouldn’t require the dev having access to the site. But generally speaking, we prefer to just recruit trustworthy people, and trust them. 🙂

      • Carl Alberto 7:33 am on October 27, 2016 Permalink | Log in to Reply

        Hi Andrea,

        The remote css and github is a good tool and works fine for us, we skipped that part in the Organizer Handbook so it was late for us to know how to set it up properly.

        Anyway, thanks to the community team that is always ready to guides us 🙂

c
compose new post
j
next post/next comment
k
previous post/previous comment
r
reply
e
edit
o
show/hide comments
t
go to top
l
go to login
h
show/hide help
shift + esc
cancel
Skip to toolbar