# Django 1.8.18.dev20170123152445 documentation

# Database transactions

Django gives you a few ways to control how database transactions are managed.

## Managing database transactions

### Django’s default transaction behavior

Django’s default behavior is to run in autocommit mode. Each query is immediately committed to the database, unless a transaction is active. See below for details.

Django uses transactions or savepoints automatically to guarantee the integrity of ORM operations that require multiple queries, especially delete() and update() queries.

Django’s `TestCase` class also wraps each test in a transaction for performance reasons.

### Tying transactions to HTTP requests

A common way to handle transactions on the web is to wrap each request in a transaction. Set `ATOMIC_REQUESTS` to `True` in the configuration of each database for which you want to enable this behavior.

It works like this. Before calling a view function, Django starts a transaction. If the response is produced without problems, Django commits the transaction. If the view produces an exception, Django rolls back the transaction.

You may perform subtransactions using savepoints in your view code, typically with the `atomic()` context manager. However, at the end of the view, either all or none of the changes will be committed.

Warning

While the simplicity of this transaction model is appealing, it also makes it inefficient when traffic increases. Opening a transaction for every view has some overhead. The impact on performance depends on the query patterns of your application and on how well your database handles locking.

Per-request transactions and streaming responses

When a view returns a `StreamingHttpResponse`, reading the contents of the response will often execute code to generate the content. Since the view has already returned, such code runs outside of the transaction.

Generally speaking, it isn’t advisable to write to the database while generating a streaming response, since there’s no sensible way to handle errors after starting to send the response.

In practice, this feature simply wraps every view function in the `atomic()` decorator described below.

Note that only the execution of your view is enclosed in the transactions. Middleware runs outside of the transaction, and so does the rendering of template responses.

When `ATOMIC_REQUESTS` is enabled, it’s still possible to prevent views from running in a transaction.

`non_atomic_requests`(using=None)

  This decorator will negate the effect of `ATOMIC_REQUESTS` for a given view:

      from django.db import transaction

      @transaction.non_atomic_requests
      def my_view(request):
          do_stuff()

      @transaction.non_atomic_requests(using='other')
      def my_other_view(request):
          do_stuff_on_the_other_database()

  It only works if it’s applied to the view itself.

### Controlling transactions explicitly

Django provides a single API to control database transactions.

`atomic`(using=None, savepoint=True)

  Atomicity is the defining property of database transactions. `atomic` allows us to create a block of code within which the atomicity on the database is guaranteed. If the block of code is successfully completed, the changes are committed to the database. If there is an exception, the changes are rolled back.

  `atomic` blocks can be nested. In this case, when an inner block completes successfully, its effects can still be rolled back if an exception is raised in the outer block at a later point.

  `atomic` is usable both as a decorator:

      from django.db import transaction

      @transaction.atomic
      def viewfunc(request):
          # This code executes inside a transaction.
          do_stuff()

  and as a context manager:

      from django.db import transaction

      def viewfunc(request):
          # This code executes in autocommit mode (Django's default).
          do_stuff()

          with transaction.atomic():
              # This code executes inside a transaction.
              do_more_stuff()

  Wrapping `atomic` in a try/except block allows for natural handling of integrity errors:

      from django.db import IntegrityError, transaction

      @transaction.atomic
      def viewfunc(request):
          create_parent()

          try:
              with transaction.atomic():
                  generate_relationships()
          except IntegrityError:
              handle_exception()

          add_children()

  In this example, even if `generate_relationships()` causes a database error by breaking an integrity constraint, you can execute queries in `add_children()`, and the changes from `create_parent()` are still there. Note that any operations attempted in `generate_relationships()` will already have been rolled back safely when `handle_exception()` is called, so the exception handler can also operate on the database if necessary.

  Avoid catching exceptions inside `atomic`!

  When exiting an `atomic` block, Django looks at whether it’s exited normally or with an exception to determine whether to commit or roll back. If you catch and handle exceptions inside an `atomic` block, you may hide from Django the fact that a problem has happened. This can result in unexpected behavior.

  This is mostly a concern for `DatabaseError` and its subclasses such as `IntegrityError`. After such an error, the transaction is broken and Django will perform a rollback at the end of the `atomic` block. If you attempt to run database queries before the rollback happens, Django will raise a `TransactionManagementError`. You may also encounter this behavior when an ORM-related signal handler raises an exception.

  The correct way to catch database errors is around an `atomic` block as shown above. If necessary, add an extra `atomic` block for this purpose. This pattern has another advantage: it delimits explicitly which operations will be rolled back if an exception occurs.

  If you catch exceptions raised by raw SQL queries, Django’s behavior is unspecified and database-dependent.

  In order to guarantee atomicity, `atomic` disables some APIs. Attempting to commit, roll back, or change the autocommit state of the database connection within an `atomic` block will raise an exception.

  `atomic` takes a `using` argument which should be the name of a database. If this argument isn’t provided, Django uses the `"default"` database.

  Under the hood, Django’s transaction management code:

  - opens a transaction when entering the outermost `atomic` block;
  - creates a savepoint when entering an inner `atomic` block;
  - releases or rolls back to the savepoint when exiting an inner block;
  - commits or rolls back the transaction when exiting the outermost block.

  You can disable the creation of savepoints for inner blocks by setting the `savepoint` argument to `False`. If an exception occurs, Django will perform the rollback when exiting the first parent block with a savepoint if there is one, and the outermost block otherwise. Atomicity is still guaranteed by the outer transaction. This option should only be used if the overhead of savepoints is noticeable. It has the drawback of breaking the error handling described above.

  You may use `atomic` when autocommit is turned off. It will only use savepoints, even for the outermost block.

  Previously the outermost atomic block couldn’t be declared with `savepoint=False` when autocommit was turned off.

Performance considerations

Open transactions have a performance cost for your database server. To minimize this overhead, keep your transactions as short as possible. This is especially important if you’re using `atomic()` in long-running processes, outside of Django’s request / response cycle.

## Autocommit

### Why Django uses autocommit

In the SQL standards, each SQL query starts a transaction, unless one is already active. Such transactions must then be explicitly committed or rolled back.

This isn’t always convenient for application developers. To alleviate this problem, most databases provide an autocommit mode. When autocommit is turned on and no transaction is active, each SQL query gets wrapped in its own transaction. In other words, not only does each such query start a transaction, but the transaction also gets automatically committed or rolled back, depending on whether the query succeeded.

PEP 249, the Python Database API Specification v2.0, requires autocommit to be initially turned off. Django overrides this default and turns autocommit on.

To avoid this, you can deactivate the transaction management, but it isn’t recommended.

### Deactivating transaction management

You can totally disable Django’s transaction management for a given database by setting `AUTOCOMMIT` to `False` in its configuration. If you do this, Django won’t enable autocommit, and won’t perform any commits. You’ll get the regular behavior of the underlying database library.

This requires you to commit explicitly every transaction, even those started by Django or by third-party libraries. Thus, this is best used in situations where you want to run your own transaction-controlling middleware or do something really strange.

## Low-level APIs

Warning

Always prefer `atomic()` if possible at all. It accounts for the idiosyncrasies of each database and prevents invalid operations.

The low level APIs are only useful if you’re implementing your own transaction management.

### Autocommit

Django provides a straightforward API in the `django.db.transaction` module to manage the autocommit state of each database connection.

`get_autocommit`(using=None)

`set_autocommit`(autocommit, using=None)

These functions take a `using` argument which should be the name of a database. If it isn’t provided, Django uses the `"default"` database.

Autocommit is initially turned on. If you turn it off, it’s your responsibility to restore it.

Once you turn autocommit off, you get the default behavior of your database adapter, and Django won’t help you. Although that behavior is specified in PEP 249, implementations of adapters aren’t always consistent with one another. Review the documentation of the adapter you’re using carefully.

You must ensure that no transaction is active, usually by issuing a `commit()` or a `rollback()`, before turning autocommit back on.

Django will refuse to turn autocommit off when an `atomic()` block is active, because that would break atomicity.

### Transactions

A transaction is an atomic set of database queries. Even if your program crashes, the database guarantees that either all the changes will be applied, or none of them.

Django doesn’t provide an API to start a transaction. The expected way to start a transaction is to disable autocommit with `set_autocommit()`.

Once you’re in a transaction, you can choose either to apply the changes you’ve performed until this point with `commit()`, or to cancel them with `rollback()`. These functions are defined in `django.db.transaction`.

`commit`(using=None)

`rollback`(using=None)

These functions take a `using` argument which should be the name of a database. If it isn’t provided, Django uses the `"default"` database.

Django will refuse to commit or to rollback when an `atomic()` block is active, because that would break atomicity.

### Savepoints

A savepoint is a marker within a transaction that enables you to roll back part of a transaction, rather than the full transaction. Savepoints are available with the SQLite (≥ 3.6.8), PostgreSQL, Oracle and MySQL (when using the InnoDB storage engine) backends. Other backends provide the savepoint functions, but they’re empty operations – they don’t actually do anything.

Savepoints aren’t especially useful if you are using autocommit, the default behavior of Django. However, once you open a transaction with `atomic()`, you build up a series of database operations awaiting a commit or rollback. If you issue a rollback, the entire transaction is rolled back. Savepoints provide the ability to perform a fine-grained rollback, rather than the full rollback that would be performed by `transaction.rollback()`.

When the `atomic()` decorator is nested, it creates a savepoint to allow partial commit or rollback. You’re strongly encouraged to use `atomic()` rather than the functions described below, but they’re still part of the public API, and there’s no plan to deprecate them.

Each of these functions takes a `using` argument which should be the name of a database for which the behavior applies. If no `using` argument is provided then the `"default"` database is used.

Savepoints are controlled by three functions in `django.db.transaction`:

`savepoint`(using=None)

  Creates a new savepoint. This marks a point in the transaction that is known to be in a “good” state. Returns the savepoint ID (`sid`).

`savepoint_commit`(sid, using=None)

  Releases savepoint `sid`. The changes performed since the savepoint was created become part of the transaction.

`savepoint_rollback`(sid, using=None)

  Rolls back the transaction to savepoint `sid`.

These functions do nothing if savepoints aren’t supported or if the database is in autocommit mode.

In addition, there’s a utility function:

`clean_savepoints`(using=None)

  Resets the counter used to generate unique savepoint IDs.

The following example demonstrates the use of savepoints:

    from django.db import transaction

    # open a transaction
    @transaction.atomic
    def viewfunc(request):

        a.save()
        # transaction now contains a.save()

        sid = transaction.savepoint()

        b.save()
        # transaction now contains a.save() and b.save()

        if want_to_keep_b:
            transaction.savepoint_commit(sid)
            # open transaction still contains a.save() and b.save()
        else:
            transaction.savepoint_rollback(sid)
            # open transaction now contains only a.save()

Savepoints may be used to recover from a database error by performing a partial rollback. If you’re doing this inside an `atomic()` block, the entire block will still be rolled back, because it doesn’t know you’ve handled the situation at a lower level! To prevent this, you can control the rollback behavior with the following functions.

`get_rollback`(using=None)

`set_rollback`(rollback, using=None)

Setting the rollback flag to `True` forces a rollback when exiting the innermost atomic block. This may be useful to trigger a rollback without raising an exception.

Setting it to `False` prevents such a rollback. Before doing that, make sure you’ve rolled back the transaction to a known-good savepoint within the current atomic block! Otherwise you’re breaking atomicity and data corruption may occur.

## Database-specific notes

### Savepoints in SQLite

While SQLite ≥ 3.6.8 supports savepoints, a flaw in the design of the `sqlite3` module makes them hardly usable.

When autocommit is enabled, savepoints don’t make sense. When it’s disabled, `sqlite3` commits implicitly before savepoint statements. (In fact, it commits before any statement other than `SELECT`, `INSERT`, `UPDATE`, `DELETE` and `REPLACE`.) This bug has two consequences:

- The low level APIs for savepoints are only usable inside a transaction ie. inside an `atomic()` block.
- It’s impossible to use `atomic()` when autocommit is turned off.

### Transactions in MySQL

If you’re using MySQL, your tables may or may not support transactions; it depends on your MySQL version and the table types you’re using. (By “table types,” we mean something like “InnoDB” or “MyISAM”.) MySQL transaction peculiarities are outside the scope of this article, but the MySQL site has information on MySQL transactions.

If your MySQL setup does not support transactions, then Django will always function in autocommit mode: statements will be executed and committed as soon as they’re called. If your MySQL setup does support transactions, Django will handle transactions as explained in this document.

### Handling exceptions within PostgreSQL transactions

Note

This section is relevant only if you’re implementing your own transaction management. This problem cannot occur in Django’s default mode and `atomic()` handles it automatically.

Inside a transaction, when a call to a PostgreSQL cursor raises an exception (typically `IntegrityError`), all subsequent SQL in the same transaction will fail with the error “current transaction is aborted, queries ignored until end of transaction block”. Whilst simple use of `save()` is unlikely to raise an exception in PostgreSQL, there are more advanced usage patterns which might, such as saving objects with unique fields, saving using the force_insert/force_update flag, or invoking custom SQL.

There are several ways to recover from this sort of error.

#### Transaction rollback

The first option is to roll back the entire transaction. For example:

    a.save() # Succeeds, but may be undone by transaction rollback
    try:
        b.save() # Could throw exception
    except IntegrityError:
        transaction.rollback()
    c.save() # Succeeds, but a.save() may have been undone

Calling `transaction.rollback()` rolls back the entire transaction. Any uncommitted database operations will be lost. In this example, the changes made by `a.save()` would be lost, even though that operation raised no error itself.

#### Savepoint rollback

You can use savepoints to control the extent of a rollback. Before performing a database operation that could fail, you can set or update the savepoint; that way, if the operation fails, you can roll back the single offending operation, rather than the entire transaction. For example:

    a.save() # Succeeds, and never undone by savepoint rollback
    sid = transaction.savepoint()
    try:
        b.save() # Could throw exception
        transaction.savepoint_commit(sid)
    except IntegrityError:
        transaction.savepoint_rollback(sid)
    c.save() # Succeeds, and a.save() is never undone

In this example, `a.save()` will not be undone in the case where `b.save()` raises an exception.