Jeff Jaffe

@robinberjon How's that?

@nevali I take the comments in that spirit. Help us make it better!

@nevali @danbri @wilm Developers understand they need the functions in AF. Maybe a different taxonomy is better. I'm open to input.

@nevali @danbri @wilm I guess we have our work cut out for ourselves. Thanks for the data.

@nevali @danbri @wilm Good question Mo. I hope the web standards community knows what the Open Web Platform is. If not; need more outreach.

@danbri @wilm @nevali It is an attempt to summarize and organize what I see as the web community's workplan.

@mamund @danbri Well I talk about the considerable work already underway in the web community - i.e. by doc authors.

@wilm @nevali @danbri Wilbert, that's basically it. Not with a clean slate: taking what we are already doing and putting it into a framework

@briankardell @sgalineau @annevk @domenic Can't we all work together without politics getting into everything?

@koalie @W3C_Webizen @jcverdie ::))

@koalie @W3C_Webizen @jcverdie I didn't say I reserved #1. I only requested a very low number.

@annevk @w3c @afbarstow We wanted low price / individual. Valuable membership forces the price to be too high for this program.

@annevk @w3c Anne, we haven't developed this proposal yet, did you want to help us develop it?