ಟ್ವೀಟ್‌ಗಳು

	michael_nielsen @michael_nielsen	1 ನಿಮಿ
	@lisacrost @tophtucker Incidentally, I'm reluctant to commit to definitions. As I wrote to a friend about defining "interface" recently: pic.twitter.com/2L6hKmKPhT
	ಸಂವಾದವನ್ನು ನೋಡಿ ·

	michael_nielsen @michael_nielsen	3 ನಿಮಿ
	@lisacrost @tophtucker Parts of Wikipedia do seem to have that as a major goal. Wikipedia as a whole, probably not. Same for many books
	ಸಂವಾದವನ್ನು ನೋಡಿ ·

	michael_nielsen @michael_nielsen	5 ನಿಮಿ
	@tophtucker @lisacrost "history's diffs" is wonderfully evocative! Of course, now you need to define "history"...
	ಸಂವಾದವನ್ನು ನೋಡಿ ·

	michael_nielsen @michael_nielsen	6 ನಿಮಿ
	@lisacrost @tophtucker fashion are borderline: broad trends are news, details are arguably not (not quite enough broad human interest).
	ಸಂವಾದವನ್ನು ನೋಡಿ ·

	michael_nielsen @michael_nielsen	7 ನಿಮಿ
	@lisacrost @tophtucker Under this definition, stock prices are an edge case (not a lot of context); most traditional news fits. Things like
	ಸಂವಾದವನ್ನು ನೋಡಿ ·

	michael_nielsen @michael_nielsen	8 ನಿಮಿ
	@lisacrost @tophtucker which aim to convey & contextualize the current state of human affairs. "Current" is a rather loose term, here.
	ಸಂವಾದವನ್ನು ನೋಡಿ ·

	michael_nielsen @michael_nielsen	8 ನಿಮಿ
	@lisacrost @tophtucker Alright, a (rough) shot at this, subject to revision: in this conversation, I've been thinking of news as ppl & orgs
	ಸಂವಾದವನ್ನು ನೋಡಿ ·

	michael_nielsen @michael_nielsen	10 ನಿಮಿ
	@lisacrost @tophtucker Certainly, he's not in what we traditionally call the news business.
	ಸಂವಾದವನ್ನು ನೋಡಿ ·

	michael_nielsen @michael_nielsen	11 ನಿಮಿ
	@lisacrost @tophtucker It's a question of definitions, but at least as I think of it, Max is in the news business.
	ಸಂವಾದವನ್ನು ನೋಡಿ ·

	michael_nielsen @michael_nielsen	15 ನಿಮಿ
	@lisacrost @tophtucker I like the term "reactive news"! Implies "proactive news", or something like that.
	ಸಂವಾದವನ್ನು ನೋಡಿ ·

	michael_nielsen @michael_nielsen	18 ನಿಮಿ
	@tophtucker @lisacrost How do you think Vox (etc) have succeeded? And failed? What else could they have tried?
	ಸಂವಾದವನ್ನು ನೋಡಿ ·

	michael_nielsen @michael_nielsen	21 ನಿಮಿ
	@lisacrost @tophtucker It's hard for me to believe I won't like it. The title & cover alone are almost worth it. Great coffee-table book!
	ಸಂವಾದವನ್ನು ನೋಡಿ ·

	michael_nielsen @michael_nielsen	23 ನಿಮಿ
	@lisacrost @MaxCRoser is for interested data viz people to build new channels, like ourworldindata.
	ಸಂವಾದವನ್ನು ನೋಡಿ ·

	michael_nielsen @michael_nielsen	23 ನಿಮಿ
	@lisacrost Actually, let me amend that, since it commits two sins I dislike (suggesting what people do, and stereotyping): a better solution
	ಸಂವಾದವನ್ನು ನೋಡಿ ·

	michael_nielsen @michael_nielsen	25 ನಿಮಿ
	@lisacrost @tophtucker There goes $38 :-)
	ಸಂವಾದವನ್ನು ನೋಡಿ ·

	michael_nielsen @michael_nielsen	26 ನಿಮಿ
	@lisacrost @tophtucker Oh my.
	ಸಂವಾದವನ್ನು ನೋಡಿ ·

	michael_nielsen @michael_nielsen	26 ನಿಮಿ
	@tophtucker @lisacrost Vox looks to me like punditry with a data veneer. 538 is much better, and ourworldindata is much better still.
	ಸಂವಾದವನ್ನು ನೋಡಿ ·

	michael_nielsen @michael_nielsen	29 ನಿಮಿ
	@lisacrost @MaxCRoser @GuidoMingels Nice!
	ಸಂವಾದವನ್ನು ನೋಡಿ ·

	michael_nielsen @michael_nielsen	29 ನಿಮಿ
	@lisacrost @MaxCRoser Makes me wonder if a better solution isn't for people like you to build new channels (like ourworldindata)!
	ಸಂವಾದವನ್ನು ನೋಡಿ ·

	michael_nielsen @michael_nielsen	30 ನಿಮಿ
	@lisacrost @MaxCRoser In that vein, v. interesting post by @Sulliview on why Nate Silver left the Times: publiceditor.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/07/22/nat…
	ಸಂವಾದವನ್ನು ನೋಡಿ ·