Tweets

	Second Nexus @SecondNexus	1 h
	O'Reilly's troubles continue. qklnk.co/4I4hoo
	Ver resumen ·

	Second Nexus retwitteó
	Seth Abramson @SethAbramson	1 abr.
	Respondiendo a @SethAbramson (16) And (g) before immunity is given you make a proffer--a broad statement of what evidence you have--but it seems we don't have one here.
	Ver conversación ·

	Second Nexus retwitteó
	Seth Abramson @SethAbramson	1 abr.
	Respondiendo a @SethAbramson (15) no one will ever discover; (f) his attorney has no info on what the feds have, so how can he determine how much danger his client's in?
	Ver conversación ·

	Second Nexus retwitteó
	Seth Abramson @SethAbramson	1 abr.
	Respondiendo a @SethAbramson (14) he wouldn't ask for use immunity on a charge he's now dead to rights on; (e) he wouldn't ask for _any_ immunity for a crime he knows...
	Ver conversación ·

	Second Nexus retwitteó
	Seth Abramson @SethAbramson	1 abr.
	Respondiendo a @SethAbramson (13) he'd need immunity from all 3 to make it useful; (c) it's too early to ask for transactional immunity unless he can deliver POTUS; (d)
	Ver conversación ·

	Second Nexus retwitteó
	Seth Abramson @SethAbramson	1 abr.
	Respondiendo a @SethAbramson (12) All of which makes Flynn's immunity offer bizarre. (a) They're never made publicly; (b) there are 3 entities investigating him, so...
	Ver conversación ·

	Second Nexus retwitteó
	Seth Abramson @SethAbramson	1 abr.
	Respondiendo a @SethAbramson (11) Meanwhile, Flynn and his attorney would have known that it's too early to get transactional immunity. There's more investigating to do.
	Ver conversación ·

	Second Nexus retwitteó
	Seth Abramson @SethAbramson	1 abr.
	Respondiendo a @SethAbramson (10) And of course it doesn't make sense to seek use immunity for a crime you committed that you know _no one_ will ever find out about.
	Ver conversación ·

	Second Nexus retwitteó
	Seth Abramson @SethAbramson	1 abr.
	Respondiendo a @SethAbramson (9) Flynn could seek use immunity on a crime no one knows about yet. But with so many investigating, he knows they'd get him by other means.
	Ver conversación ·

	Second Nexus retwitteó
	Seth Abramson @SethAbramson	1 abr.
	Respondiendo a @SethAbramson (8) As to Flynn, it seems the FBI already has the goods on him for making false statements. So use immunity doesn't help him on that charge.
	Ver conversación ·

	Second Nexus retwitteó
	Seth Abramson @SethAbramson	1 abr.
	Respondiendo a @SethAbramson (7) Defense attorneys always ask for transactional immunity. Prosecutors always say no--unless it convicts a major figure, like a president.
	Ver conversación ·

	Second Nexus retwitteó
	Seth Abramson @SethAbramson	1 abr.
	Respondiendo a @SethAbramson (6) Derivative use immunity means your testimony can't be used against you, _nor_ can any evidence discovered as a result of that testimony.
	Ver conversación ·

	Second Nexus retwitteó
	Seth Abramson @SethAbramson	1 abr.
	Respondiendo a @SethAbramson (5) Use immunity says testimony in a criminal case can't be used to charge you with a crime or as evidence against you. Prosecutors love it.
	Ver conversación ·

	Second Nexus retwitteó
	Seth Abramson @SethAbramson	1 abr.
	Respondiendo a @SethAbramson (4) Transactional immunity means you can't be prosecuted for any crime involved in a discrete course of conduct. Defendants love/want this.
	Ver conversación ·

	Second Nexus retwitteó
	Seth Abramson @SethAbramson	1 abr.
	Respondiendo a @SethAbramson (3) There are 3 major types of immunity: use immunity, derivative use immunity, and transactional immunity. The first is worst, last best.
	Ver conversación ·

	Second Nexus retwitteó
	Seth Abramson @SethAbramson	1 abr.
	Respondiendo a @SethAbramson (2) Certain legal concepts discussed in this thread have been slightly simplified for the purposes of explaining their contours via Twitter.
	Ver conversación ·

	Second Nexus retwitteó
	Seth Abramson @SethAbramson	1 abr.
	Respondiendo a @SethAbramson (1) What follows is analysis of a news story, not legal advice or the practice of law. If you need an attorney, seek one in your local area.
	Ver conversación ·

	Second Nexus retwitteó
	Seth Abramson @SethAbramson	1 abr.
	(MEGA-THREAD) RETWEET if you or anyone you know wants to understand the legal implications of Mike Flynn seeking immunity from prosecution. pic.twitter.com/zPJxklMWQL
	Ver foto ·

	Second Nexus @SecondNexus	31 mar.
	The resistance has a face: Anyone who uses the internet. qklnk.co/XOOGY8
	Ver resumen ·

	Second Nexus @SecondNexus	30 mar.
	North Carolina lawmakers continue to plant themselves on the wrong side of history. #HB2 qklnk.co/qJa4nk
	Ver resumen ·