Skip to content

Review & Mapping by Biocaddie DATS [Metadata Working Group 3] #1196

Open
proccaserra opened this Issue Jun 3, 2016 · 1 comment

2 participants

@proccaserra
proccaserra commented Jun 3, 2016 edited

*linked to the following issue, "Improving Dataset descriptions":
#1083

*NIH BD2K BioCaddie DATS slides:
https://biocaddie.org/sites/default/files/d7/webinar/551/datameddatsv2-webinar-1jun2016.pdf

presented during the following seminar:
https://biocaddie.org/events/webinars/special-webinar-datameds-dats-model-annotated-schema-org

*Mapping File between BioCaddie DATS elements and Schema.org/LifeScience extension:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1la7Cpg1TAURNgjHyzhjf3MH8KWvO1ASjt7APvkCpXx0/edit#gid=0

by @agbeltran & @proccaserra

schema.org
-No notion of Grant , Funding agency (but there is sponsor)
-No notion of Data Model, Specification, Standard (closest match: DigitalDocument and relation

lifescience-extension
-No notion of variable (dependent or independent)
-Need to extend/refine Substance to allow talking about Protein, RNA, DNA, small molecules.
-Study restricted to 'Medical Study' (ie only Human can be participants)
-TreatmentAgent only available in the context of
-Treatment intensity only available to 'physicalExercise'
-No notion of 'Organism' except in the context of an infection agent.

work with Bioschema.org group too.

@agbeltran

Also related to #1991, #383, #1190.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Something went wrong with that request. Please try again.