Stefan Molyneux

Appreciate the work Freedomain Radio has been doing this election cycle? Please help us out - www.fdrurl.com/donate Thank you so much for all your wonderfully kind support my friends! :)

Freedomain Radio just passed 76 million video views, and added over 100,000 subscribers in 2015 - thank you so much for your wonderfully kind support my friends, please help us bring even more philosophy to an increasingly desperate world in 2016! www.freedomainradio.com/donate

Just watched your video "What Pisses Me Off About The Germany Rape Attacks" and it made me subscribed to your channel. Thank you for reporting the truth. I posted the news article on my FB profile when it was reported (the harrassment and rape of women in Cologne, Germany). Not one of my family members has commented on it. They are all basically waiting with open arms for the migrants/refugees to arrive. from the Inland Empire, California, USA

I donated. You don't have to be in lockstep with the ideas you promote to appreciate the work that you do and the insight you provide. You make the internet a better place.

Hi ! You could make a informative video talking about what happened in Lebanon when they took muslims refugees and got overwhelmed by them. Because what's happening in Europe and Canada is not new, they are following the same modus operandi that they used in Lebanon. If you made a video like this, it would be easier to share with someone who doesn't undertand the muslim depredative culture. somehitng like this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=brehUhjwQjs&t=1s

i was somehow unsubbed from your channel .. strange

These people who watch your videos, what are their demographics?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vZUJ7PZ8f74 Stefan, please watch this lecture on genetic entropy. It will change your fundamental assumptions about the primary axiom of evolution.

Can we get back to philosophy? What do you think about Harris and Peterson's argument? Many people mistakenly believe Peterson is making a relativist argument, but it's in fact a pragmatic ethicist one. Would love your comments or analysis on this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1gdpyzwOOYY That is, if you're intellectually and philosophically up to the task.

TRUMP 2016!!!

The Truth about the Dakota access pipeline please.........

1: What if USA SJW's got everything they wanted? This is an interesting thought experiment because much of their demands are unrealistic and seemingly impossible, a 0% rape accusation rate without women taking any precautions, women feeling afraid of men when waling home at night, women having completely equal positions in every field, a complete lack of microaggressions, etc. and that's just the feminist side of the coin! But the reality is that all of their demands are completely achievable, you'd just have to take some very totalitarian steps to get them. For one thing, most of the demands concerning privilege can be solved with segregation, removing all white contact with non whites, and all male contact with females, you get a society divided into four areas, each with their own segregated telecommunications (especially the internet), businesses, etc. The four quarantine zones would be: One for white men, one for white women, one for men of color, and one for women of color, due to the progressive stack, the "best" areas will be quarantined for the women of color, the "second best" for men of color, the "second worst" for white women, and the "worst" for white men, and taxes will be structured so that the occupants of the "worse" zones will have to hand over their prosperity to the occupants of the "better" zones. Reproduction will be achieved entirely via artificial insemination, unless some other technology comes around that eliminates the need for one sex or another entirely, this will be performed in such a way as to avoid any contact between men and women, white women will only be allowed to be impregnated by white men, and women of color will only be able to become pregnant by men of color. To avoid complicating things too much, gays and lesbians will not receive their own zones, especially due to a lack of members of the opposite sex to give them any distinction from straights, as for trans rights, the moment any individual identifies as the opposite sex, they will be reclassified as such, and moved into the zone dedicated to the other sex, and the same racial grouping. This oppressive totalitarian dystopia can only lead to negative outcomes, especially when certain individuals find a way to game the system, such as a horny straight man who finds out that he can have access to a lot of horny straight women, if he just identifies himself as a women, although that might just lead to the removal of tras-trans-relocation, if it doesn't, it might result in the refusal of such a society to accept that people are lying about their gender identity just to get laid, and those who make such a statement would be dismissed as transphobic bigots. This is just one of the many emergent problems that would ultimately lead to the experimental social justice society's collapse, and probably to a violent one, as even the most beta cuck of a  white man would likely become violently angry at the continually worsening treatment he would have to recieve to make reality fit into the delusions of SJW's, especially since the residents of the other zones will also be unhappy with the results of their ideal society, but just blame the other zones for making it so unpleasant, which would lead to them creating new policies to punish them for their self-created hell. v2: Instead of segregation, they enforce strict employment quotas, though the powers that be refuse to publicly state that this is the case, they acknowledge that the more free and equal a country is, the more unequal the outcomes of each demographic that is recognized by the progressive stack becomes. And so they make a law that states that every hiring and firing must progress towards creating an employment population that is statistically equal to the general population of the country, to accommodate for the any growth or shrinkage, upon reaching this version of equality, any employer can hire or fire anyone they wish, so long as every employment or termination that follows once again progresses towards equality until it is once again reached. By severely limiting the available jobs to the citizens based upon the combination of progressive stack demographics they fit into, the idea is that they will only take the jobs that contribute towards their version of equality. The result will be a significant population that makes no choice at all, how the government responds can vary, they might try to make it so that no one can take governmental assistance if a job is available to them, the "if you don't work, you don't eat" policy, and justify this policy by pointing to how private charity has not (yet) been prohibited (and with the private knowledge that private charity will hopefully be unable to provide enough support to sustain these "parasites", a term used only in private by the establishment to describe those who refuse to take a path that they despise). Or they can be much, much worse, such as choosing one of the available jobs for them, and forcing these people to work the jobs they got assigned to, they can defend this policy against being labelled slavery by pointing out how these citizens are STILL BEING PAID for their work, and how they HAD a choice, but refused to make it, so the government was being forced BY THEM, to make the decision on their behalf, and to use force to ensure that ANY WORK GETS DONE AT ALL. (< CAPS LOCK IS CRUISE CONTROL FOR RHETORICAL EMPHASIS) I have no idea how this version of this scenario would differ from it's other version, a third version could be proposed where both of these policies are put into place, so you would have to deal with the class fallout of government-enforced discrimination laws (though an SJW regime would never call them that), as well as the simultaneous war of the sexes and race war that would result from having the largest-scale, and most heavily-enforced quarantines in history. - 2. What if all USA law enforcement stopped pursuing or charging non-white suspects? This one is another interesting scenario, imagine that, without any public announcement, all law enforcement, including not only police, but also courts and prisons, simply abandoned any case in which a non-white individual or organization is the primary suspect, they would continue to pursue whites and white organizations for their crimes, but any case that BLM might take offense to will simply not be pursued, when this gets noticed they may be called racist for doing what would appear to be refusing to serve or protect minority groups, but in this scenario they either explain the policy they have adopted, or deny that they have such a policy, and just keep at it, until it gets to the point of no return, where even a full-scale crackdown specifically targetting criminals of color could not bring this back to the status quo. The ultimate result would be the destruction or violent reformation of the United States, white people who could afford it would leave the country, and create a "whiteopia", where non-whites are simply not allowed to enter, back in the states, the poor whites would be genocided over time, those who manage to survive would also escape to their own "whiteopia", but if they manage to establish such places, they would be very hostile to anyone who wasn't descended from the founders of such a place, the primary victims in such areas would be outsider whites. he reason none of the non-whites who were law enforcement or supporters of them would be allowed in, is the paranoid suspicion that non-whites would lie about their political allegiance to gain access, and destroy the refuge from within, whereas whites who lie about their allegiances would not be able to mount an effectual resistance, see the weakness of antifa protestors when encountering opposition from the average guy in the working class. Meanwhile the non-white population would have something out of a post-apocalyptic movie, as the US law has essentially been removed, with only a few non-white law enforcement and their supporters acting as an ineffectual hold-out resistance, whatever new replacement for the country will have to come out of the power struggles between the majority non-white inhabitants of the land, essentially the country's society will have to be built up from scratch, it will be bloody, and blamed entirely upon white people, especially those who decided to escape to "whiteopias". Neither of these scenarios has yet accounted for how other nations would react to such scenarios, which could greatly change how they would ultimately turn out.

What is the most subtle thing you've ever observed?

FUKUSHIMA, Plumgate Turns out Obama covered it up! it is VERY bad Worse that you can Believe!

Hello stefan, I'm big fan of yours and I like your theory about the big sister and I remembered this old Polish comedy about a dystopian world dominated by women, it's quite interesting because it was created in 1983 and hod to go through communist censorship, yet they still have managed to sneak up how the big state control people. /watch?v=w3kfZk2YFLA .

Hey, can you please confirm the usefulness of the "Iran has an avg. IQ of 84" stat? It looks like it was taken in 1957 and that developing countries are known to have rapid IQ changes over time. I won't even go into why else it would be impossible for Iran to have a retarded IQ at this point. I'd appreciate the courage to clarify and retract on that issue. Thanks.

Freedomain Radio Amazon Affiliate Links! US: http://www.fdrurl.com/Amazon Canada: http://www.fdrurl.com/AmazonCanada UK: http://www.fdrurl.com/AmazonUK

Freedom of speech in the UK. I was sitting outside a Starbucks in London with a friend. He showed me the front page headline in the local paper about the alleged abuse of an elderly man in the local hospital. The article said, amongst other things, that a cleaner had thrown away his false teeth, which were in a glass beside his bed. I commented: Do cleaners throw away false teeth? A short time later I heard someone behind me say: He's got a large beard. I turned to see a man glaring at me. Five minutes later two burly policemen appeared and , without enquiring as to what was going on, went through the motions of giving me a "first warning" ("you get three warnings") as per the Public Order Act, Section 5. They didn't ask my name. The man who had called them worked at the hospital.

I normally do not write to people but you may find this as interesting as myself or maybe even more-so. This is a unique and interesting situation because I have no idea who you are but I just watched two of your videos and I agree with almost everything you are saying and appreciate the way your mind works. It all sounds fairly obvious to me. Now here is the rub, I have been thinking that maybe I am loosing my mind or something as I have slowly been able to see the world and people the way it and they really are. Most people look naive, fake or a little crazy to me and sound really fake and disingenuous, intellectually dishonest, even. I feel I have had an epiphany of some sort. So either you are some crazy nut on the Internet that I am relating to because I am slowly loosing my mind or you are one of the really brilliant minds out there and I am slowly catching on to it all. Some reassurance on your part would be welcomed (although I am sure you would not admit to your craziness if you really were) and also any questions you might have for someone like me who is pretty honest and can provide you with some insight into how that infantile liberal mindset operates because I just left there. I feel like my brain just switched gears into a higher consciousness or reality is warping or something. Can you relate to or understand anything of which I speak? lol ps, That Lauren girl you were talking to is really smart also and has a cute smile. [email protected]

I would like to see you engage in an exchange of philosophy "interview"with people like Ravi Zacharias, R.C. Sproul,Greg Koukl. The things you believe & talk about would hold more weight if you would engage some intellectually challenging people from the Christian perspective.These aren't the average types from the easily stumped everyday person or pastor etc,,.Not to be disrespectful, but I think some of your objections & references to the bible & Christianity are from tired old traditions , misinterpretations & possibly emotional intellectual objections due to the aforementioned.I have heard answers to most of your comments about that religion & think you should be more up to date as this isn't one to be ignored or harrumphed & brushed off because of the seriously challenging nature of those persons named. I know many Christians are easily stumped including many who are famous but are intellectual dilettantes.I really enjoy your stimulating videos & look forward to them even sharing some of FB.