[Experimental] List of manuscripts available for review volunteers
Background: Food preservation is essential to the growing world population, food economy. Freezing is a commonly used method for food preservation. While extending the life of the product, freezing has detrimental effects. It is causing loss of food weight and is causing changes in food quality, e.g. enzymatic browning.
Method: Freezing of food is usually done under constant atmospheric pressure (isobaric). We have developed a new technology in which biological materials are preserved at subfreezing temperatures in an isochoric (constant volume) system. Experiments were performed with a food product, potato, in a thermodynamic isochoric device designed by us, that is robust and has no moving parts.
Results: We have shown that under similar storage conditions, freezing to -5°C, the isochoric preserved potato experienced no weight loss and limited enzymatic browning. In contrast the -5°C isobaric frozen potato experienced substantial weight loss and substantial enzymatic browning. Microscopic analysis, shows that the mechanism responsible for the different results is related to the integrity of the cell and the cell membrane, which are maintain during freezing in the isochoric system and lost during freezing in the isobaric system.
Discussion: The main mechanism of cell damage during isobaric freezing are the increase in extracellular osmolality and the mechanical damage by ice crystals. In contrast, during isochoric freezing the cells in the preserved material are under conditions in which the intracellular osmolality is comparable to the extracellular osmolality and they are not affected by ice mechanical damage. The conditions during isochoric freezing result in improved quality of the preserved food products.
Conclusion: We have shown that the quality of food products preserved by isochoric freezing is better than the quality of food preserved to the same temperature in isobaric conditions. This is only a preliminary study on isochoric preservation of food. However, it illustrates the potential of the technology.
Phytochemicals produced by plants, including at flowers, function in protection against plant diseases, and have a long history of use against trypanosome infection. Floral nectar and pollen, the sole food sources for many species of insect pollinators, contain phytochemicals that have been shown to reduce trypanosome infection in bumble and honey bees when fed as isolated compounds. Nectar and pollen, however, consist of phytochemical mixtures, which can have greater antimicrobial activity than do single compounds. This study tested the hypothesis that pollen extracts would inhibit parasite growth.Extracts of six different pollens were tested for direct inhibitory activity against cell cultures of the bumble bee trypanosome gut parasite Crithidia bombi.
Surprisingly, pollen extracts increased parasite growth rather than inhibiting it. Experimental manipulations of growth media showed that supplemental monosaccharides (glucose and fructose) were sufficient to promote growth, while a common floral phytochemical (caffeic acid) with inhibitory activity against other trypanosomes had only weak inhibitory effects on Crithidia bombi. These results indicate that, although pollen is essential for bees and other pollinators, pollen may promote growth of intestinal parasites that are uninhibited by pollen phytochemicals and, as a result, can benefit from the nutrients that pollen provides.
Is this open peer review?
No, peer review is still single-blind and all recommendations are private between the authors and Academic Editor. However, any reviewer has the option to sign their report, and once accepted for publication then that review can be shown publicly - again this is optional.
Will I be guaranteed to review if I volunteer?
No. Volunteering is not a guarantee that you will be asked to review. This is for many reasons. For one, reviewers must have relevant qualifications for any manuscript and void of any conflicts of interest. Additionally, it could be that enough reviewers have accepted an invitation to review already, in which case we would not invite any more.
Why aren't there more manuscripts available?
Manuscripts are shown when authors have opted-in for obtaining reviewers through the reviewer-match service. Additionally, there may already be enough reviewers found through other means, for example, invitations sent by the Academic Editor in charge.
What are the editorial criteria?
Please visit the editorial criteria page for initial guidance. You will also be given additional information if invited to review.