Access
You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen Reader
This content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.Journal Article
The Puruṣārthas: An Axiological Exploration of Hinduism
Arvind Sharma
The Journal of Religious Ethics
Vol. 27, No. 2 (Summer, 1999), pp. 223-256
Published by: Blackwell Publishing Ltd on behalf of Journal of Religious Ethics, Inc
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40018229
Page Count: 34
You can always find the topics here!
Topics: Dharma, Hindus, Soul, Religious ethics, Pleasure, Hinduism, Axiology, Hindu ethics, Karma, Humans
Were these topics helpful?
See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
- Item Type
- Article
- Thumbnails
- References
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Abstract
Three doctrines have often been identified in the context of Hindu civilization as its distinctive markers: the doctrine of the varṇas (or the doctrine of the four classes), the doctrine of āśramas (or the doctrine of the four stages of life), and the doctrine of the puruṣārthas (or the doctrine of the four goals of life). The study of the last of these has been comparatively neglected and the doctrine has even been dubbed a myth (Krishna 1996, 189-205). The purpose of this article is twofold: to establish the cogency of the doctrine of the puruṣārthas in the face of such criticism and to indicate the directions in which the doctrine could be developed further.
Page Thumbnails
-
223
-
224
-
225
-
226
-
227
-
228
-
229
-
230
-
231
-
232
-
233
-
234
-
235
-
236
-
237
-
238
-
239
-
240
-
241
-
242
-
243
-
244
-
245
-
246
-
247
-
248
-
249
-
250
-
251
-
252
-
253
-
254
-
255
-
256
The Journal of Religious Ethics © 1999 Journal of Religious Ethics, Inc