Thursday, November 12, 2015
When students ask me about the Affordable Care Act, I often say that the policy was motivated as much by the desire to redistribute income as it was to reform the health care system. I recently ran across the following chart from Brookings economists Henry Aaron and Gary Burtless that shows the degree of redistribution that the act entails.
Wednesday, November 04, 2015
Thursday, October 29, 2015
Presidential Probabilities
Now that Intrade is gone, here is one place to see who is ahead based on betting odds.
Update: A friend emails me:
It's clear from the numbers that this market doesn't expect a credible third-party candidate. Interestingly, this means that the reported unconditional probability of becoming president (the third column) is the product of the reported probability of winning a party nomination (one of the first two columns) and the implied conditional probability.
Clinton's implied probability of getting elected conditional on winning the Democratic nomination is 60.3%. That means that, "on average," the Republican nominee has a 39.7% chance of winning. The market's view of the relative strengths of the Republican candidates can then be seen by comparing their implied conditional probabilities to this 39.7% figure:
Bush 55.4%
Carson 38.8%
Cruz 36.6%
Update: A friend emails me:
It's clear from the numbers that this market doesn't expect a credible third-party candidate. Interestingly, this means that the reported unconditional probability of becoming president (the third column) is the product of the reported probability of winning a party nomination (one of the first two columns) and the implied conditional probability.
Clinton's implied probability of getting elected conditional on winning the Democratic nomination is 60.3%. That means that, "on average," the Republican nominee has a 39.7% chance of winning. The market's view of the relative strengths of the Republican candidates can then be seen by comparing their implied conditional probabilities to this 39.7% figure:
Rubio 41.9%
Trump 42.0%Bush 55.4%
Carson 38.8%
Cruz 36.6%
Monday, October 26, 2015
Saturday, October 24, 2015
Keep the Cadillac Tax
Click here to read a piece I co-authored with Larry Summers, which is coming out in Sunday's New York Times.
Thursday, October 15, 2015
American Obesity
Critics of the U.S. health care system often say things like, "The United States spends more money than anyone else on health care but some other nations have better life expectancy." The next time someone starts making statements like that, keep in mind this chart. It is a useful reminder that differences in health outcomes depend on a lot more than differences in the system for delivering medical care.
Source. Click on graphic to enlarge.
Monday, October 12, 2015
Thursday, October 08, 2015
A Feature, Not a Bug
A few weeks ago, a poll asked people what were the first words that they thought of when they heard the names of the various presidential candidates. For Hillary Clinton, "liar" and "untrustworthy" ranked high. Many commentators saw this result as a problem for her.
I bring this up now because Clinton just came out against the TPP trade deal, even though the Obama administration strongly favors it and Clinton previously favored it. I don't know of any poll of economists on TPP, but an overwhelming majority of the profession agrees that "Past major trade deals have benefited most Americans." I would guess that TPP would also poll well among economists. FYI, here is CEA chair Jason Furman singing the praises of TPP, and here is an open letter from a sizeable group of past CEA chairs.
So, will those economists who like Clinton start to turn against her? I doubt it. My guess is that most of them don't believe what she is now saying. They expect that once she moves back into the White House, she will return to the moderate view of trade deals that her husband championed. In other words, they are counting on her being untrustworthy. If they had reason to doubt her mendacity, then they would start to worry.
I bring this up now because Clinton just came out against the TPP trade deal, even though the Obama administration strongly favors it and Clinton previously favored it. I don't know of any poll of economists on TPP, but an overwhelming majority of the profession agrees that "Past major trade deals have benefited most Americans." I would guess that TPP would also poll well among economists. FYI, here is CEA chair Jason Furman singing the praises of TPP, and here is an open letter from a sizeable group of past CEA chairs.
So, will those economists who like Clinton start to turn against her? I doubt it. My guess is that most of them don't believe what she is now saying. They expect that once she moves back into the White House, she will return to the moderate view of trade deals that her husband championed. In other words, they are counting on her being untrustworthy. If they had reason to doubt her mendacity, then they would start to worry.
Friday, October 02, 2015
Tuesday, September 29, 2015
What I am doing today
Today, I am wearing my political theory hat. If you happen to be a student at Brown, you can find me here.
Thursday, September 24, 2015
Wednesday, September 16, 2015
Feel-the-Bern Fiscal Policy
From the Wall Street Journal (news article, not editorial page):
Sen. Bernie Sanders, whose liberal call to action has propelled his long-shot presidential campaign, is proposing an array of new programs that would amount to the largest peacetime expansion of government in modern American history. In all, he backs at least $18 trillion in new spending over a decade, according to a tally by The Wall Street Journal....To pay for it, Mr. Sanders, a Vermont independent running for the Democratic nomination, has so far detailed tax increases that could bring in as much as $6.5 trillion over 10 years, according to his staff.
Monday, September 14, 2015
What to do when the natural rate of interest declines
Increase the inflation target, according to this new paper, which uses the dynamic model of aggregate demand and aggregate supply from my favorite intermediate macroeconomics textbook.
Wednesday, September 09, 2015
Twelve reasons to like Jeb’s tax plan
Jeb Bush has released a tax plan. Here are some elements of it that I find attractive:
- It lowers the top rate on personal income to 28
percent, the same rate as the bipartisan 1986 tax reform.
-
It broadens the base by capping the use of itemized
deductions.
-
It eliminates the deductibility of state and
local taxes, so low-tax states and towns no longer subsidize high-tax ones.
-
It maintains the deductibility of charitable
giving, encouraging private solutions to social problems.
-
It reforms the tax treatment of secondary earners
and seniors, who are more responsive to tax incentives than primary earners.
-
It eliminates the stealth marginal tax rates
from PEP and Pease.
-
It eliminates the estate tax, so the tax system
no longer penalizes those who want to help their children and grandchildren.
-
It lowers the corporate tax rate to be close to
international norms.
-
It moves from a global to a territorial tax
system, like most other nations have.
-
It eliminates the deductibility of interest
expenses, putting debt finance and equity finance on a more level planning
field.
-
It includes full expensing of investment
expenditure, moving the system toward a consumption-based tax.
- It expands the earned income tax credit for childless taxpayers, strengthening the social safety net.




