Google beats Oracle—Android makes “fair use” of Java APIs
Oracle has spent many millions trying to get a chunk of Android, to no avail.
Oracle has spent many millions trying to get a chunk of Android, to no avail.
Armed with Google's own e-mails, Oracle said "fair use" was nowhere to be found.
"It takes strength and courage to stand up to Google. That's what Oracle has done."
"Oracle took none of the risk, but wants all the credit, and a lot of the money."
Was Android built the right way? The decision will soon be up to a jury.
"It was established industry practice," says Page, as Oracle v. Google nears end.
Android skyrocketed as Java's phone business declined. Was it a fair fight?
Is the Mazzocchi e-mail a "smoking gun," or just a guy shooting his mouth off?
The era of the Java phone gave way to Android. Not everyone was happy.
Oracle's expert gives Android a failing grade without the "copied code."
"I immediately said, 'Thou shalt not steal'—It's an oldie but a goodie."
In Catz's view, Android is an "unauthorized fork" of Java.
"If your students use commercial software, they should pay for it, right?"
"The S-word and the F-word are not generally considered... professional."
On cross, Dan Bornstein is asked about scrubbing the "J-word" from source code.
"A clean room means you don't copy stuff, right, Mr. Rubin?"
| ← Older Stories |