Digital Rights Management (DRM) technologies attempt to control what you can and can't do with the media and hardware you've purchased.
- Bought an ebook from Amazon but can't read it on your ebook reader of choice? That's DRM.
- Bought a video game but can't play it today because the manufacturer's "authentication servers" are offline? That's DRM.
- Bought a smartphone but can't use the applications or the service provider you want on it? That's DRM.
- Bought a DVD or Blu-Ray but can't copy the video onto your portable media player? That's DRM.
Corporations claim that DRM is necessary to fight copyright infringement online and keep consumers safe from viruses. But there's no evidence that DRM helps fight either of those. Instead DRM helps big business stifle innovation and competition by making it easy to quash "unauthorized" uses of media and technology.
DRM has proliferated thanks to the Digital Millennium Copyright Act of 1998 (DMCA), which sought to outlaw any attempt to bypass DRM.
Fans shouldn't be treated like criminals, and companies shouldn't get an automatic veto over user choice and innovation. EFF has led the effort to free the iPhone and other smartphones, is working to uncover and explain the restrictions around new hardware and software, has fought for the right to make copies of DVDs, and sued Sony-BMG for their "rootkit" CD copy-protection scheme. Learn more about our efforts through the links below.
-
December 5, 2016
-
October 11, 2016
-
October 3, 2016
-
September 28, 2016
-
September 26, 2016
-
September 22, 2016
-
September 8, 2016
-
August 5, 2016
-
August 2, 2016
-
July 13, 2016
- 1 of 22
- next ›
-
October 27, 2016
-
August 5, 2016
-
July 21, 2016
-
May 20, 2016
-
January 20, 2015
-
July 22, 2009
-
February 9, 2009
-
October 27, 2008
-
April 29, 2008
-
June 16, 2004
-
| ZDNetOctober 11, 2016
-
| The Wall Street JournalSeptember 28, 2016
-
| ARS TechnicaSeptember 28, 2016
-
| MTV NewsSeptember 9, 2016
-
| The GuardianSeptember 8, 2016
-
| NextgovSeptember 1, 2016
-
| The Globe and MailJune 27, 2016
-
| CIOJanuary 19, 2016
-
| E-Commerce TimesOctober 19, 2015
-
| Memphis Business JournalMay 8, 2015
-
| WiredMay 8, 2015
-
| NBC Bay AreaMay 5, 2015
-
| ARS TechnicaJanuary 20, 2015
-
| ZDNetJanuary 8, 2014
-
| The RegisterOctober 7, 2013
Pages
-
October 27, 2016
-
August 5, 2016
-
August 5, 2016
-
July 21, 2016
-
April 22, 2016
-
April 22, 2016
-
February 6, 2015
-
March 28, 2013
-
November 27, 2012
-
July 19, 2012
Civil Society statement on Exceptions and Limitations for Education WIPO 24th SCCR Geneva, 16-24, July 2012
-
July 10, 2012
-
EFF did not file for DMCA exemption requests in 2006. Instead we explained why the rule-making process is fundamentally broken and unable to protect consumers.
-
In 2005, Macrovision sued Sima to block the sale of the Sima CopyThis! (CT-1, CT-Q1, CT-100, CT-2, CT-200) and GoDVD (SCC, and SCC-2) products, which are designed to digitize analog video, such as the analog video outputs of DVD players and analog VCRs.
-
In September 2008, the motion picture industry sued RealNetworks over its RealDVD software, which was designed to allow consumers to copy their DVDs to their computers for later playback.
-
The DMCA Is Not a Global Statute
The FBI arrested Russian programmer Dmitry Sklyarov while he was attending a security conference in Las Vegas to discuss the Advanced eBook Processor, a program to decrypt Adobe eBook files. This made Sklyarov the first person to be criminally charged under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA). Adobe initially pressed the case, but, after meeting with EFF, called for all charges against Sklyarov to be dropped. There is no DMCA in Russia, and a jury eventually acquitted Sklyarov's company, ElcomSoft, of willful violation.
-
EFF held Sony BMG accountable for infecting its customers' computers with software that created grave security vulnerabilities and let the company spy on listening behavior.
Sony BMG included the dangerous software on millions of music CDs as part of a misguided attempt to restrict consumer usage. After pushing Sony BMG to take the CDs off the market, EFF filed and subsequently settled a class-action lawsuit that forced Sony to repair the damage already done. EFF also successfully pressured Sunncomm, the creators of one of the harmful technologies, to fix the security flaws.
-
Green v. Department of Justice is an EFF lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act’s anti-circumvention and anti-trafficking provisions on First Amendment grounds.

eff.org/nsa-spying
