8.2.1.11 ORDER BY Optimization

8.2.1.11 ORDER BY Optimization
Previous	8.2.1 Optimizing SELECT Statements	Next

In some cases, MySQL can use an index to satisfy an ORDER BY clause without doing extra sorting.

The index can also be used even if the ORDER BY does not match the index exactly, as long as all unused portions of the index and all extra ORDER BY columns are constants in the WHERE clause. The following queries use the index to resolve the ORDER BY part:

SELECT * FROM t1
  ORDER BY key_part1,key_part2,... ;

SELECT * FROM t1
  WHERE key_part1 = constant
  ORDER BY key_part2;

SELECT * FROM t1
  ORDER BY key_part1 DESC, key_part2 DESC;

SELECT * FROM t1
  WHERE key_part1 = 1
  ORDER BY key_part1 DESC, key_part2 DESC;

SELECT * FROM t1
  WHERE key_part1 > constant
  ORDER BY key_part1 ASC;

SELECT * FROM t1
  WHERE key_part1 < constant
  ORDER BY key_part1 DESC;

SELECT * FROM t1
  WHERE key_part1 = constant1 AND key_part2 > constant2
  ORDER BY key_part2;

In some cases, MySQL cannot use indexes to resolve the ORDER BY, although it still uses indexes to find the rows that match the WHERE clause. These cases include the following:

The query uses ORDER BY on different indexes:
```
SELECT * FROM t1 ORDER BY key1, key2;
```
The query uses ORDER BY on nonconsecutive parts of an index:
```
SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE key2=constant ORDER BY key_part2;
```

The query mixes ASC and DESC:

SELECT * FROM t1 ORDER BY key_part1 DESC, key_part2 ASC;

The index used to fetch the rows differs from the one used in the ORDER BY:
```
SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE key2=constant ORDER BY key1;
```
The query uses ORDER BY with an expression that includes terms other than the index column name:
```
SELECT * FROM t1 ORDER BY ABS(key);
SELECT * FROM t1 ORDER BY -key;
```
The query joins many tables, and the columns in the ORDER BY are not all from the first nonconstant table that is used to retrieve rows. (This is the first table in the EXPLAIN output that does not have a const join type.)
The query has different ORDER BY and GROUP BY expressions.
There is an index on only a prefix of a column named in the ORDER BY clause. In this case, the index cannot be used to fully resolve the sort order. For example, if only the first 10 bytes of a CHAR(20) column are indexed, the index cannot distinguish values past the 10th byte and a filesort will be needed.
The index does not store rows in order. For example, this is true for a HASH index in a MEMORY table.

Availability of an index for sorting may be affected by the use of column aliases. Suppose that the column t1.a is indexed. In this statement, the name of the column in the select list is a. It refers to t1.a, so for the reference to a in the ORDER BY, the index can be used:

SELECT a FROM t1 ORDER BY a;

In this statement, the name of the column in the select list is also a, but it is the alias name. It refers to ABS(a), so for the reference to a in the ORDER BY, the index cannot be used:

SELECT ABS(a) AS a FROM t1 ORDER BY a;

In the following statement, the ORDER BY refers to a name that is not the name of a column in the select list. But there is a column in t1 named a, so the ORDER BY uses that and the index can be used. (The resulting sort order may be completely different from the order for ABS(a), of course.)

SELECT ABS(a) AS b FROM t1 ORDER BY a;

By default, MySQL sorts all GROUP BY col1, col2, ... queries as if you specified ORDER BY col1, col2, ... in the query as well. If you include an explicit ORDER BY clause that contains the same column list, MySQL optimizes it away without any speed penalty, although the sorting still occurs.

Note

Relying on implicit GROUP BY sorting is deprecated. To achieve a specific sort order of grouped results, it is preferable to use an explicit ORDER BY clause. GROUP BY sorting is a MySQL extension that may change in a future release; for example, to make it possible for the optimizer to order groupings in whatever manner it deems most efficient and to avoid the sorting overhead.

If a query includes GROUP BY but you want to avoid the overhead of sorting the result, you can suppress sorting by specifying ORDER BY NULL. For example:

INSERT INTO foo
SELECT a, COUNT(*) FROM bar GROUP BY a ORDER BY NULL;

The optimizer may still choose to use sorting to implement grouping operations. ORDER BY NULL suppresses sorting of the result, not prior sorting done by grouping operations to determine the result.

With EXPLAIN SELECT ... ORDER BY, you can check whether MySQL can use indexes to resolve the query. It cannot if you see Using filesort in the Extra column. See Section 8.8.1, “Optimizing Queries with EXPLAIN”. Filesort uses a fixed-length row-storage format similar to that used by the MEMORY storage engine. Variable-length types such as VARCHAR are stored using a fixed length.

MySQL has two filesort algorithms for sorting and retrieving results. The original method uses only the ORDER BY columns. The modified method uses not just the ORDER BY columns, but all the columns referenced by the query.

The optimizer selects which filesort algorithm to use. It normally uses the modified algorithm except when BLOB or TEXT columns are involved, in which case it uses the original algorithm. For both algorithms, the sort buffer size is the sort_buffer_size system variable value.

The original filesort algorithm works as follows:

Read all rows according to key or by table scanning. Skip rows that do not match the WHERE clause.
For each row, store in the sort buffer a tuple consisting of a pair of values (the sort key value and the row ID).
If all pairs fit into the sort buffer, no temporary file is created. Otherwise, when the sort buffer becomes full, run a qsort (quicksort) on it in memory and write it to a temporary file. Save a pointer to the sorted block.
Repeat the preceding steps until all rows have been read.
Do a multi-merge of up to MERGEBUFF (7) regions to one block in another temporary file. Repeat until all blocks from the first file are in the second file.
Repeat the following until there are fewer than MERGEBUFF2 (15) blocks left.
On the last multi-merge, only the row ID (the last part of the value pair) is written to a result file.
Read the rows in sorted order using the row IDs in the result file. To optimize this, read in a large block of row IDs, sort them, and use them to read the rows in sorted order into a row buffer. The row buffer size is the read_rnd_buffer_size system variable value. The code for this step is in the sql/records.cc source file.

One problem with this approach is that it reads rows twice: One time during WHERE clause evaluation, and again after sorting the value pairs. And even if the rows were accessed successively the first time (for example, if a table scan is done), the second time they are accessed randomly. (The sort keys are ordered, but the row positions are not.)

The modified filesort algorithm incorporates an optimization to avoid reading the rows twice: It records the sort key value, but instead of the row ID, it records the columns referenced by the query. The modified filesort algorithm works like this:

Read the rows that match the WHERE clause.
For each row, store in the sort buffer a tuple consisting of the sort key value and the columns referenced by the query.
When the sort buffer becomes full, sort the tuples by sort key value in memory and write it to a temporary file.
After merge-sorting the temporary file, retrieve the rows in sorted order, but read the columns required by the query directly from the sorted tuples rather than by accessing the table a second time.

The tuples used by the modified filesort algorithm are longer than the pairs used by the original algorithm, and fewer of them fit in the sort buffer. As a result, it is possible for the extra I/O to make the modified approach slower, not faster. To avoid a slowdown, the optimizer uses the modified algorithm only if the total size of the extra columns in the sort tuple does not exceed the value of the max_length_for_sort_data system variable. (A symptom of setting the value of this variable too high is a combination of high disk activity and low CPU activity.)

If a filesort is done, EXPLAIN output includes Using filesort in the Extra column.

Suppose that a table t1 has four VARCHAR columns a, b, c, and d and that the optimizer uses filesort for this query:

SELECT * FROM t1 ORDER BY a, b;

The query sorts by a and b, but returns all columns, so the columns referenced by the query are a, b, c, and d. Depending on which filesort algorithm the optimizer chooses, the query executes as follows:

For the original algorithm, sort buffer tuples have these contents:

(fixed size a value, fixed size b value,
row ID into t1)

The optimizer sorts on the fixed size values. After sorting, the optimizer reads the tuples in order and uses the row ID in each tuple to read rows from t1 to obtain the select list column values.

For the modified algorithm, sort buffer tuples have these contents:

(fixed size a value, fixed size b value,
a value, b value, c value, d value)

The optimizer sorts on the fixed size values. After sorting, the optimizer reads the tuples in order and uses the values for a, b, c, and d to obtain the select list column values without reading t1 again.

For slow queries for which filesort is not used, try lowering max_length_for_sort_data to a value that is appropriate to trigger a filesort.

To increase ORDER BY speed, check whether you can get MySQL to use indexes rather than an extra sorting phase. If this is not possible, you can try the following strategies:

Increase the sort_buffer_size variable value. Ideally, the value should be large enough for the entire result set to fit in the sort buffer (to avoid writes to disk and merge passes), but at minimum the value must be large enough to accommodate fifteen tuples.
Take into account that the size of column values stored in the sort buffer is affected by the max_sort_length system variable value. For example, if tuples store values of long string columns and you increase the value of max_sort_length, the size of sort buffer tuples increases as well and may require you to increase sort_buffer_size. For column values calculated as a result of string expressions (such as those that invoke a string-valued function), the filesort algorithm cannot tell the maximum length of expression values, so it must allocate max_sort_length bytes for each tuple.
To monitor the number of merge passes, check the Sort_merge_passes status variable.
Increase the read_rnd_buffer_size variable value.
Use less RAM per row by declaring columns only as large as they need to be to hold the values stored in them. For example, CHAR(16) is better than CHAR(200) if values never exceed 16 characters.
Change the tmpdir system variable to point to a dedicated file system with large amounts of free space. The variable value can list several paths that are used in round-robin fashion; you can use this feature to spread the load across several directories. Paths should be separated by colon characters (:) on Unix and semicolon characters (;) on Windows. The paths should name directories in file systems located on different physical disks, not different partitions on the same disk.

Previous	Up	Next
8.2.1.10 Outer Join Simplification	Home	8.2.1.12 GROUP BY Optimization