| 2015-10 | Fernsehen SWR1 “Leute” |
| 2015-04 | Schweizer Fernsehen |
| 2012-03 | Focus 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 (in German) |
| 2011-07 | Demand from China so high that my domain was down a day |
| 2009-10 | in abc News |
| 2008-09 | portrayed by Die ZEIT |
| 2008-04 | referenced by NY Times |
| 2007-11 | portrayed in fudder |
| 2007-11 | daVinci – 3sat |
| 2007-10 | Planetarium Freiburg |
| 2007-06 | Bayerisches Fernsehen: Faszination Wissen |
| 2006-09 | Dugg, →4.5 million hits/day |
| 2006-08 | Focus online |
| 2005-10 | PC Magazine: a Top 101 Site |
| 2005-08 | BBC Online |
| 2005-08 | the Mac Observer |
| 2005-07 | Planetarium Freiburg |
| 2005-06 | a > 2 million hits/days spike |
| 2005-05 | “Image of the week” by Viperlib |
| 2005-05 | > 1 million hits/day |
| 2005-02 | “Web Pick” by Yahbooks |
| 2004-12 | |
| 2004-11 | TV: Discoveries, Sci Chan |
| 2004-11 | NSDL Reports Life Sci |
| 2004-10 | Highlighted in Science |
| 2004-10 | > 500,000 hits/day |
| 2004-09 | Wikipedia |
| 2004-03 | Nürnberger Nachrichten |
| 2004-03 | Brainweek |
| 2004 | Yahoo Directory |
| 2003-09 | > 100,000 hits/day |
|
|
Visual Phenomena & Optical Illusions130 of them – by Michael Bach (G+)[other language: Deutsch] |
… are fascinating! They also teach us about our visual perception, and its limitations. This huge selection emphazises beauty and interactive experiments; I also attempt explanations of the visual mechanisms involved where possible.
»Optical illusion« sounds pejorative, as if exposing a malfunction of the visual system. Rather, I view these phenomena as highlighting particular good adaptations of our visual system to experience with standard viewing situations. These experiences are based on normal visual experiences, and thus under unusual contexts can lead to inappropriate interpretations of a visual scene (=Bayesian interpretation of perception).
If you are not a vision scientist, you might find my explanations too highbrow. That is not on purpose. Reason: vision research simply is not trivial, like any science. So, if the explanation seems gibberish, simply enjoy the phenomenon 😉.
More here: Bach & Poloschek (2006) Optical Illusions Primer; on the programming: Bach (2014, PDF).
No. The web is full of claims that your personality (right- or left brain dominated, intro- vs. extroverted, or whatever) can be deduced from your ability to see some certain illusion or not. However, I know of no reliable scientific data that suggests this. That's just click-baiting BS. There is some influence of age, though – but you don't need illusions to know your age… So: Don’t let it irk you if you don’t see all the phenomena described. For many illusions, there is a percentage of people with perfectly normal vision who just don’t see it, mostly for reasons currently unknown.
Before we delve in, I’d like to express my thanks for your @feedback; any advice is appreciated.
| 4 demonstrations require the free Macromedia’s/Adobe’s Flash player . |
|