SHA-3/Keccak #11

Open
smarts opened this Issue Oct 28, 2015 · 2 comments

5 participants

@smarts

SHA-3 has been published. Why not require (or strongly suggest) support for it as well?

@fmarier
World Wide Web Consortium member

Why not require (or strongly suggest) support for it as well?

That's certainly something we should add to V2. Adding this requirement to V1 at this point would move us away from having our two shipping compliant implementations.

@dveditz dveditz added the SRI-next label Oct 28, 2015
@metromoxie metromoxie added this to the v2 milestone Oct 28, 2015
@fmarier fmarier removed the SRI-next label Oct 29, 2015
@hillbrad hillbrad modified the milestone: v2 Jan 22, 2016
@smarts

Why was this removed from the v2 milestone?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment