IESG agenda: 2018-04-05
1. Administrivia
1.1 Roll call
1.2 Bash the agenda
1.3 Approval of the minutes of past telechats
1.4 List of remaining action items from last telechat
OUTSTANDING TASKS
Last updated: March 8, 2018
o Kathleen Moriarty and Benjamin Kaduk to find a designated expert for
RFC 5793 [IANA #1050763].
- Added 2018-02-22 (2 telechats ago)
2. Protocol actions
Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?"
2.1 WG submissions
2.1.1 New items
- IETF stream
- draft-ietf-sidr-slurm
- Proposed Standard
- Simplified Local internet nUmber Resource Management with the RPKI
- Token
- Alvaro Retana (RTG area)
- IANA review
- Version Changed - Review Needed
- Consensus
- Yes
- Reviews
- IETF stream
- draft-ietf-6tisch-6top-protocol
- Proposed Standard
- 6top Protocol (6P)
- Token
- Suresh Krishnan (INT area)
- IANA review
- IANA - Review Needed
- Consensus
- Yes
- Reviews
- Last call expires
- 2018-03-26
- IETF stream
- draft-ietf-mmusic-trickle-ice-sip
- Proposed Standard
- A Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Usage for Trickle ICE
- Token
- Ben Campbell (ART area)
- IANA review
- IANA OK - Actions Needed
- Consensus
- Yes
- Reviews
- IETF stream
- draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type
- Proposed Standard
- Conveying path setup type in PCEP messages
- Token
- Deborah Brungard (RTG area)
- IANA review
- IANA OK - Actions Needed
- Consensus
- Yes
- Reviews
- Last call expires
- 2018-03-28
- IETF stream
- draft-ietf-6man-ndpioiana
- Proposed Standard
- IPv6 ND PIO Flags IANA considerations
- Token
- Suresh Krishnan (INT area)
- IANA review
- IANA OK - Actions Needed
- Consensus
- Yes
- Reviews
- IETF stream
- draft-ietf-6lo-rfc6775-update
- Proposed Standard
- Registration Extensions for 6LoWPAN Neighbor Discovery
- Token
- Suresh Krishnan (INT area)
- IANA review
- Version Changed - Review Needed
- Consensus
- Yes
- Reviews
- IETF stream
- draft-ietf-ice-trickle
- Proposed Standard
- Trickle ICE: Incremental Provisioning of Candidates for the Interactive Connectivity Establishment (ICE) Protocol
- Token
- Ben Campbell (ART area)
- IANA review
- IANA OK - Actions Needed
- Consensus
- Yes
- Reviews
- IETF stream
- draft-ietf-tls-iana-registry-updates
- Proposed Standard
- IANA Registry Updates for TLS and DTLS
- Token
- Benjamin Kaduk (SEC area)
- IANA review
- IANA OK - Actions Needed
- Consensus
- Yes
- Reviews
- IETF stream
- draft-ietf-tls-record-limit
- Proposed Standard
- Record Size Limit Extension for Transport Layer Security (TLS)
- Token
- Benjamin Kaduk (SEC area)
- IANA review
- IANA OK - Actions Needed
- Consensus
- Yes
- Reviews
- IETF stream
- draft-ietf-i2rs-rib-data-model
- Proposed Standard
- A YANG Data Model for Routing Information Base (RIB)
- Token
- Martin Vigoureux (RTG area)
- IANA review
- IANA - Review Needed
- Consensus
- Yes
- Reviews
- Last call expires
- 2018-03-30
- IETF stream
- draft-ietf-l2sm-l2vpn-service-model
- Proposed Standard
- A YANG Data Model for L2VPN Service Delivery
- Token
- Ignas Bagdonas (OPS area)
- IANA review
- IANA - Not OK
- Consensus
- Yes
- Reviews
- IETF stream
- draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-dc-fabric-network-topology
- Proposed Standard
- A YANG Data Model for Fabric Topology in Data Center Networks
- Token
- Martin Vigoureux (RTG area)
- IANA review
- IANA - Review Needed
- Consensus
- Yes
- Reviews
- Last call expires
- 2018-04-03
2.1.2 Returning items
(None)
2.2 Individual submissions
2.2.1 New items
- IETF stream
- draft-ietf-trill-over-ip
- Proposed Standard
- TRILL (Transparent Interconnection of Lots of Links) Over IP Transport
- Token
- Martin Vigoureux (NONE area)
- Deferred by
- Mirja Kühlewind on 2018-03-08
- IANA review
- Version Changed - Review Needed
- Consensus
- Yes
- Reviews
2.2.2 Returning items
(None)
2.3 Status changes
2.3.1 New items
- IETF stream
- status-change-bier-core-to-proposed-standard
- None
- Promote BIER Architecture and Encapsulation to Proposed Standard (based on updating charter)
- Token
- Alia Atlas (IETF area)
- Deferred by
- Eric Rescorla on 2018-03-08
2.3.2 Returning items
(None)
3. Document actions
3.1 WG submissions
Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?"
3.1.1 New items
- IETF stream
- draft-ietf-teas-scheduled-resources
- Informational
- Framework for Scheduled Use of Resources
- Token
- Deborah Brungard (RTG area)
- IANA review
- IANA OK - No Actions Needed
- Consensus
- Yes
- Reviews
- Last call expires
- 2018-03-28
- IPR
-
Director of licensing's Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-teas-scheduled-resources
Huawei Technologies Co.,Ltd's Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-teas-scheduled-resources
- IETF stream
- draft-ietf-rmcat-sbd
- Experimental
- Shared Bottleneck Detection for Coupled Congestion Control for RTP Media.
- Token
- Mirja Kühlewind (TSV area)
- IANA review
- IANA OK - No Actions Needed
- Consensus
- Unknown
- Reviews
- IETF stream
- draft-ietf-i2rs-rib-info-model
- Informational
- Routing Information Base Info Model
- Token
- Martin Vigoureux (RTG area)
- IANA review
- IANA OK - No Actions Needed
- Consensus
- Yes
- Reviews
- Last call expires
- 2018-03-30
3.1.2 Returning items
(None)
3.2 Individual submissions via AD
Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?"
3.2.1 New items
- IETF stream
- draft-gutmann-scep
- Informational
- Simple Certificate Enrolment Protocol
- Token
- Alexey Melnikov (NONE area)
- IANA review
- IANA OK - Actions Needed
- Consensus
- Yes
- Reviews
3.2.2 Returning items
(None)
3.3 Status changes
Reviews should focus on these questions: "Are the proposed changes to document status appropriate? Have all requirements for such a change been met? If not, what changes to the proposal would make it appropriate?"
3.3.1 New items
(None)
3.3.2 Returning items
(None)
3.3.3 For action
- IETF stream
- status-change-kerberos-3des-rc4-to-historic
- None
- Deprecating 3DES and RC4 in Kerberos (Status Change)
- Token
- Eric Rescorla (IETF area)
3.4 IRTF and Independent Submission stream documents
The IESG will use RFC 5742 responses:
- The IESG has concluded that there is no conflict between this document and IETF work;
- The IESG has concluded that this work is related to IETF work done in WG <X>, but this relationship does not prevent publishing;
- The IESG has concluded that publication could potentially disrupt the IETF work done in WG <X> and recommends not publishing the document at this time;
- The IESG has concluded that this document violates IETF procedures for <Y> and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval; or
- The IESG has concluded that this document extends an IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval.
The document shepherd must propose one of these responses in the conflict-review document, and the document shepherd may supply text for an IESG Note in that document. The Area Director ballot positions indicate consensus with the response proposed by the document shepherd and agreement that the IESG should request inclusion of the IESG Note.
Other matters may be recorded in comments, and the comments will be passed on to the RFC Editor as community review of the document.
3.4.1 New items
(None)
3.4.2 Returning items
(None)
3.4.3 For action
- Conflict review
-
conflict-review-nir-cfrg-rfc7539bis
IETF conflict review for draft-nir-cfrg-rfc7539bis - IRTF Informational
-
draft-nir-cfrg-rfc7539bis
ChaCha20 and Poly1305 for IETF Protocols - Token
- Alissa Cooper
4. Working Group actions
4.1 WG creation
4.1.1 Proposed for IETF review
(None)
4.1.2 Proposed for approval
(None)
4.2 WG rechartering
4.2.1 Under evaluation for IETF review
(None)
4.2.2 Proposed for approval
(None)